Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2009, 01:49 AM   #91 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nummela (Finland)
Posts: 544

Siitin - '98 Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

Starppa - '96 Starlet
90 day: 35.06 mpg (US)

Aeroscania - '97 P94D 260
90 day: 9.35 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 64.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 103 Times in 59 Posts
This winter tire rolling resistance winner in many tests were Nokian hakkapeliitta R (New version) and the next best was Michelin XI2. Results were the same on overall test results. So i Would recommend hakkapeliitta R for new winter tires or if that is not sold then XI2.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 02:12 PM   #92 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: England
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I noticed the Dunlop Fast Response Tyres posted quite well

I'm running Dunlop Sport SP1 and I love them, quiet, good grip and good eceonomy
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 03:24 PM   #93 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,011

The Q - '02 Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 260
Thanked 123 Times in 86 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
Ernie,

I have no idea why you were told this, but it is not true.

The reason tire manufacturers do not give out RR data is:

1) There is no agreed upon test procedure. There are at least 4 methods that I know of and they give different numerical values - although the rank order remains the same.

This is one of the issues troubling the California Energy Commission (CEC) when they try to come up with a regulation. The test results from different sources has to be the same.

2) Different test facilities given different results. This has been looked at and it is apparent that the test facilities can be correlated - however, the "base" facility (the one everyone else has to correlate to) has to be identified and a correlation procedure developed.

It has been suggested by NHTSA (National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration) that the Federal government (NHTSA) be the regulating body rather than have 50 different regulations - and their suggestion is to use a common tire for the correlation, so every tire tested would be a percentage of that - and their preference is the SRTT (Standard Reference Test Tire) Unfortunately, this doesn't address the tire size issue.

3) RR varies by tire size. Very early in the process, the CEC was confronted with the paradox that identical tires gave different results depending on tire size - with large tires giving smaller coefficients.

This might result in "one-off" tires that are used to characterize the entire tire line. However, if it were regulated that EVERY tire size / design combination were to be tested, it would occupy EVERY test facility in the world for over a year. In other words, no new development could take place.

So, NO, the tire manufacturers DO NOT know the RR of every tire they make.

The RMA (Rubber Manufacturers Association) has not only been cooperating with both NHTSA and the CEC to come up with a workable regulation, but they've also encouraging the regulators to understand the issues involved and overcome them. The tire manufacturers - through the RMA wants something that makes sense, is usable, and consumer friendly, and not too expensive. Thus far, it has been difficult to find concensus among the various stakeholders.

Nevertheless, it is just plain wrong to characterize the RMA as "gagging" the tire manufacturers. They ARE the tire manufacturers!! and they are trying to find a way to make it work.
I was struck by a couple of thoughts:
1. there really are two sides to every opinion

2. Ecomodder has attracted a pretty knowledged and varied group of posters
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2009, 04:08 PM   #94 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,037

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.85 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 28.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 51
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
...use the California RR-value numbers! California passed a law that all new cars sold in their state must use low-RR tires, so they must have a "scoring" of "listing" of what brands and model tires are acceptable.

...of course, you'd better send along a self-addressed and stamped envelope to guarantee any possibility of getting an "...answer..." since I'm sure their 'Postal $tamps Budget' ain't what it used to be (ha,ha).
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SIDI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 07:55 AM   #95 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 69 Times in 56 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...... California passed a law that all new cars sold in their state must use low-RR tires, so they must have a "scoring" of "listing" of what brands and model tires are acceptable.

......
I think you'll find the law did not make it through the process. It got caught up in exactly the problems I listed above.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2009, 05:09 AM   #96 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 13
Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Useful information... thank you for keeping it alive!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 03:24 PM   #97 (permalink)
Manic Rabbit
 
Southcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 134

Slow-n-Low - '81 Rabbit S
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
so... after all this time has there ever been a re-visit to "low rolling resistance tires"? Tax refund coming, and I planning on getting new tires... 13s
__________________
-Edward

Driven on Colorado roads, where NOTHING is flat
Present City 3x / Highway 4x
Goal: 4x / 5x
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 03:46 PM   #98 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,402

PaleCivic - '96 Civic DX Sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 72.37 mpg (US)
Thanks: 123
Thanked 123 Times in 87 Posts
When Round and Black Becomes Lean and Green
Also, Kumho has a new eco model coming.
__________________
- - - - -Best 11-mile commute: 105 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 88.5 mpg / 1133 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 03:58 PM   #99 (permalink)
Manic Rabbit
 
Southcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 134

Slow-n-Low - '81 Rabbit S
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
When Round and Black Becomes Lean and Green
Also, Kumho has a new eco model coming.
ya, seen that article... when I have a car with 15" (or larger) wheels I might be able to use those models of tires, any details on the Kumhos?

edit... I do see the Goodyear Integrity on thar, was hoping for a little better selection/detail on other 13" tires
__________________
-Edward

Driven on Colorado roads, where NOTHING is flat
Present City 3x / Highway 4x
Goal: 4x / 5x
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 04:03 PM   #100 (permalink)
Manic Rabbit
 
Southcross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 134

Slow-n-Low - '81 Rabbit S
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 33.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Kumho eco Solus perhaps?
Kumho eco Solus HM KR22


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
-Edward

Driven on Colorado roads, where NOTHING is flat
Present City 3x / Highway 4x
Goal: 4x / 5x
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LRR (low rolling resistance) tires - Green Seal report & list MetroMPG EcoModding Central 38 04-13-2011 07:12 AM
Video: Can Skinnier Tires Increase Fuel Economy? Peakster EcoModding Central 62 03-12-2011 03:58 PM
Looking for a fuel efficient solution. I've got a few ideas. CuriousOne EcoModding Central 41 03-28-2009 03:46 PM
FS: Set of (5) VX Rims with LRR Tires XFi For Sale 2 02-16-2008 03:49 PM
Calculating Rolling Resistance SVOboy EcoModding Central 0 11-18-2007 04:20 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com