Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2012, 07:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 382

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '011 CBR250R
90 day: 92.93 mpg (US)

Ninja 250R SE Green - '09 Ninja 250R SE
90 day: 65.9 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Fit Auto
90 day: 32.56 mpg (US)

Kawi Ninja650 - '07 Ninja650
90 day: 65.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 59 Times in 51 Posts
Tuned intake runner lenght?

So, I want to make a tuned runner for my 2011 Honda CBR250R motorcycle with it's fuel injected single. Has anyone seen a web site with a good calculator? This bike already has a huge airbox and air filter and a pronounced tuned runner extending into the clean side of the air box. It might already be as good as it can get for fuel economy but I have no idea what the tuning frequency currently is. It might be as high as 8,600 rpm where a big power peak develops whenever an after market exhaust is fitted. I might like to extend it to get the tuning to match my 65 mph cruise rpms of 6,000 and accept whatever reduction in peak hp at higher speeds that result.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
Attached Images
File Type: jpg TwoBros Dyno with and wo remap comp.jpg (50.0 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg CBR engine comper.jpg (48.9 KB, 13 views)

Last edited by sendler; 01-28-2012 at 07:53 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 07:59 PM   #2 (permalink)
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 183

White2003Focus - '03 Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 32 Times in 24 Posts
Wallace Racing - Automotive Calculators
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 09:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 382

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '011 CBR250R
90 day: 92.93 mpg (US)

Ninja 250R SE Green - '09 Ninja 250R SE
90 day: 65.9 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Fit Auto
90 day: 32.56 mpg (US)

Kawi Ninja650 - '07 Ninja650
90 day: 65.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 59 Times in 51 Posts
wow! 1 square inches by 14 inches long for 6,000 rpm. It looks like the stock tuning is indeed closer to 1.5 square inches at 9.8 inches long for a peak of 8,700. I would have to make a major mod to find room for 4 more inches of length. Would probably have to add a 90* elbow. I wonder what the gain in torque at 6000 would be if I bother to try.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 09:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 382

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '011 CBR250R
90 day: 92.93 mpg (US)

Ninja 250R SE Green - '09 Ninja 250R SE
90 day: 65.9 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Fit Auto
90 day: 32.56 mpg (US)

Kawi Ninja650 - '07 Ninja650
90 day: 65.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 59 Times in 51 Posts
The throttle body is actually 1.77 square inches. 38mm diameter. His calculators don't allow to fix the area and calculate just the length vs rpm. I assume that the stock 1.77 square inches will still fairly closely follow theory for a 14 inch runner resonating at the desired 6,000 rpm. The over sized cross area only serving to broaden and round off the peak slightly.

Last edited by sendler; 01-28-2012 at 09:38 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2012, 10:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...look here too: http://ecomodder.com/forum/279769-post37.html

...also, this book: Two-Stroke Tuner's Handbook, by Gordon Jennings, 1973, H.P.Books (ISBN 0-912656-41-7).
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 03:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 705
Thanks: 38
Thanked 63 Times in 53 Posts
your elbow would have to be a GENTLE curve or it will screw up the reverb - look at the exhaust pipe, not the header, for an example.

also, tuning the intake ONLY works at WOT. Do you need more power at a lower RPM?

And you can get second and third harmonics to work as well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 08:23 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 382

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '011 CBR250R
90 day: 92.93 mpg (US)

Ninja 250R SE Green - '09 Ninja 250R SE
90 day: 65.9 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Fit Auto
90 day: 32.56 mpg (US)

Kawi Ninja650 - '07 Ninja650
90 day: 65.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 59 Times in 51 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100 View Post
your elbow would have to be a GENTLE curve or it will screw up the reverb - look at the exhaust pipe, not the header, for an example.

also, tuning the intake ONLY works at WOT. Do you need more power at a lower RPM?

And you can get second and third harmonics to work as well.
I'm trying to get the highest efficiency at cruise rpm which would often be 25% throttle so there is some disruption at 4 inches from the valves. But it would also be nice in competition to lower the first torque peak from the current 6,000 rpm and get the most efficiency for 90% load pulse and glide either side of 6,000 as opposed to the power band from 6,000 to 8,700 as it is now. I can also play with the cam timing as the gears are taper fit and can be timed anywhere. Shaving the head to raise compression from the stock 10.7:1 is also not out of the picture eventually. Will a closed pipe have a second harmonic or only odd order harmonics of 1,3,5?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 08:45 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 382

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '011 CBR250R
90 day: 92.93 mpg (US)

Ninja 250R SE Green - '09 Ninja 250R SE
90 day: 65.9 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Fit Auto
90 day: 32.56 mpg (US)

Kawi Ninja650 - '07 Ninja650
90 day: 65.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 59 Times in 51 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...look here too: http://ecomodder.com/forum/279769-post37.html

...also, this book: Two-Stroke Tuner's Handbook, by Gordon Jennings, 1973, H.P.Books (ISBN 0-912656-41-7).
Is the frequency of the intake determined only by the length, independent of the cross section for a normal range of areas which have apparently been optimized at 1.7 square inches for red line 10,500 rpm.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 09:19 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Gibsons, BC Canada
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
That's a good link. Up to now the only information I've found on intake tuning was highly technical. This calculator might be a bit general, but it is certainly a good starting point. I didn't see any mention of incorporating the runner length and diameter with a plenum size to take advantage of the Helmholtz principal. Has anyone seen any similar type calculators that will give ball park figures for that kind of set up?
__________________
Robert
'95 Ford E150 4.9L I6 Megasquirt MS1 Custom MSnS Extra
'92 Winnebago Elante 33 RQ Ford 7.5L V8 Megasquirt MS1 Custom MSnS Extra
'93 Bayliner 3288 Twin Ford 5.8L V8s (351 Windsors) converted to tuned port EFI. Megasquirt MS1 Custom MSnS Extra
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2012, 02:01 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 705
Thanks: 38
Thanked 63 Times in 53 Posts
with part throttle, you cannot get intake tuning, or exhaust tuning for that matter.

Tuning an intake for part throttle cannot be done, and should not be a goal as you are missing the point of it all.

If it were me, and I wanted better mileage, I'd put longer gears in it to where I can lower the rpm and use more throttle.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com