Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-10-2012, 03:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
OK This is my area of expertise.

Firstly if you're going to claim it helped provide A-B-A testing before and after. Some things work for some on here that don't work as well for others.

My baby right now is a 2004 CLK55 AMG Cabrio that I drag race twice a month, Take on canyon runs, at least once a month if not more. Also I'm a heavy footed person naturally. However I still average 18.5-19 MPG out of it Even while having fun with it. Mods ( K&N filters, Secondary Cats & Resonator Delete, Flowmaster Super 44 Muffler. Transmission internals from European spec CLK along with Tune to delete top speed limiter.)

Firstly Intake and exhaust DOES NOT garuntee mileage on all cars. As you said you're not exactly light footed on it so that is where these mods MIGHT improve your mileage. Then again there's no garuntee.

A CAI pulls in Colder Denser air therefore telling your computer to add fuel to match the A/F ratio. Now here's why it works for heavy footed drivers. 300 HP is going to have a harder time pulling 5000 LBs than 315 HP will.

If you want to upgrade your muffler I'd NEVER tell anyone not to It may help it may not. Just pick something you like the sound of. I see you're from Texas so my suggestion would be LOUD haha. There are different mufflers that flow better than others of course however sometimes it's worth losing 1 MPG for a better sound or better performance.

When you install your intake (I personally prefer the K&N FIPK) Alot of people also like AEM with a Dryflow filter. Make sure to disconnect your Negative battery cable during install and reconnect it after. This way your computer recognizes the new A/F ratio Immediately.

Either way Intake and Exhaust is a nice way to wake up the V8's in the suburban Have fun with it it's your truck however look into Aero Mods also that's where you will usually get the largest increase

__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-10-2012, 03:59 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
I'm confused.
Hoe modding a mecedes amg even close to to a suburban?
outside of 4 wheels and a v8, they have absolutely nothing in common.
Add what type of advise is.....go for the loud AND loose 1 mpg??????????


and can you document the K&N with your ABA results?
Because all of us have seen the documented report that shows a klogged filter performing the same as a clean filter.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2012, 07:12 PM   #13 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue909 View Post
I've done spark plug foulers on the O2 sensors (after cats) to trick engine (laminar air flow, its suppose to help, and it was a cheap mod.)
This is a bad eco mod.
This is a trick used on post converter oxygen sensors to trick them into reading the exhaust as being leaner than it really is after you gut the converter.
If you do this to your primary oxygen sensors then it will cause them to read lean and tell the computer to add more fuel.
*Note: As long as your catalytic converters are fully functional leave them alone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue909 View Post
I've heard the first things to do is a new air intake. I've looked around and I see 4 big categories, standard CAI (like K&N), ram air, super and turbo chargers. I've heard super & turbos actually hurt mileage (they also cost 40% of the value of my car, lol). So what is the break down of ram air vs the standard K&N air intakes? I'm hesitant with the ram air because it will require me to modify the hood of the car, but what are everyones experiences? Is the ram worth it?
Out of your 4 big categories you left out the warm/hot air intake.
People installing CAI, K&N B/S, ram air, super charger or turbo charger on daily driven gasoline powered vehicles are going to part of your immature go fast crowd.
Forget everything they ever said.
I think the ideal intake for a hard working gasoline powered vehicle would be a switchable warm/cold air intake. And no you cant go out and buy one, you will have to build it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogue909 View Post
Regarding the exhaust, I've heard that the majority of vehicles (suburbans in particular) have a wide enough exhaust that you should save those for last. So thats what I plan on doing. Although I am curious what people have paid to have their pipes redone.
It cost me about $100 to do the duel 2.5'' pipes back in 2008, then about $50 to put the all stainless steel 3 inch down pipe and 4 inch straight pipe on when I turboed the suburban this summer.
I did all the work my self, and used scrap yard stainless steel this last time.
Install instrumentation and see if you have a back pressure problem. Thats what I did and saved the exhaust mod for last and didn't expect any gains when I did it.
When the turbo went on it had to have a whole new exhaust.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
Daox (12-11-2012)
Old 12-11-2012, 01:29 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews View Post
I'm confused.
Hoe modding a mecedes amg even close to to a suburban?
outside of 4 wheels and a v8, they have absolutely nothing in common.
Add what type of advise is.....go for the loud AND loose 1 mpg??????????


and can you document the K&N with your ABA results?
Because all of us have seen the documented report that shows a klogged filter performing the same as a clean filter.
I meant the fact of using performance upgrades to net F/E Not that the Sub and Mercedes were similar.

And with the exhaust I was saying that not all mufflers are going to flow the same and some mufflers may have better flow or MPG than another. And a loud exhaust may OR may not show better FE. I was simply telling him do the tuning he wanted on his truck. I do my exhaust on my cars for the pleasure of the sound, therefore if he wants an aftermarket exhaust then go for it however It doesn't garuntee better mileage
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:05 PM   #15 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Loud exhaust pretty much guarantees no mpg improvement. It also guarantees you look like a douche when you're blatting all over the neighborhood.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
mcrews (12-11-2012)
Old 12-11-2012, 02:16 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
That's widely up to your opinion. Besides Just because there is an aftermarket exhaust on a car doesn't mean you're going to ALWAYS run the car full out to the point where Everyone and their mother will hear it. Then again I grew up around muscle cars So most of the "Loud" exhausts nowadays seem very tame
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 02:28 PM   #17 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,631

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
Loud exhaust pretty much guarantees no mpg improvement.
That's very true. Since summer my exhaust has gotten a lot louder, while my mileage has dropped dramatically!

(I should get my act together and fix it over the weekend)
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 03:04 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 150
Thanks: 19
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Here's a thought that may be worth trying... cool the fuel, heat the air. May keep the timing from getting pulled if there are knock sensors. One of the mods I did to my last gasser ram was to cool the fuel & keep it cool up to the injectors. Overall (all performance mods installed) went from average 12.0 mpg up to 14.5 on the hiway. Mods can work. Cooler fuel gave an extra 12~13% hp/tq in a 1.8t jetta (dyno proven), also did give better mpg based on data I collected on a regular daily commute of 160 mi. Since my home has nothing but diesels, cant try it myself.

Ditch the stock exhaust and get a setup that keeps the OEM diameter without the flat spots. Improve the flow from the airbox to the throttle body (take out any kinks causing turbulance) and keep the low end torque up. Any mod that does not improve torque below 2000 rpm wont help cruising mpg... in my experience. (after doing mods that addressed both go fast performance and being stingy with the fuel when needing it).

edit: forgot to mention that on that Ram I installed a 2.5" dual out cat back exhaust and lost 1.0~1.5 mpg... experimented with a reducer on the output of the muffler which brought the flow to be equal to a single 3.0" output. This brought back the lost mpg for sure but I cannot say (or remember) if it alone helped mpg.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 03:31 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
as I have stated over and over.
Stock exhuast is just fine for eco driving.
Someone PLEASE show me ANY documented test (hp preintout etc) showing improvement at the low end.
ALL the 'hot rodder bolt ons' (cai, k&N, flowmaster....etc......) show improvement ONLY at the top end.
Where (unless you are racing) you spend 1% of your engine's entire life.


note: if you spend more than 1% of your time at wot......your on the wrong forum.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 03:55 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
2000neon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 596

VX - '94 Honda Civic VX
Team Honda
90 day: 47.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 133
Thanked 89 Times in 66 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews View Post

note: if you spend more than 1% of your time at wot......your on the wrong forum.
I must have took a wrong turn somewhere on the web, one of my cars spends at least 25% of it's time at WOT.

The civic has never seen WOT while I've owned it though.

I fully agree about the exhaust though, going larger than OEM will likely not improve MPG during any sort of normal driving.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com