01-24-2012, 02:15 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,362
Thanks: 331
Thanked 183 Times in 127 Posts
|
this is ugly...
|
|
|
|
01-24-2012, 02:28 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
|
I'd totally drive that! I honestly think its horribly geeky, but I actually like that.
|
|
|
|
01-24-2012, 02:34 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,362
Thanks: 331
Thanked 183 Times in 127 Posts
|
What I find interesting is that on a quick look.....it could be one of several modded cars on the forum.
And the 'body lines' make it look as if it was put together from parts!
|
|
|
|
01-24-2012, 02:40 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 537
Thanks: 11
Thanked 154 Times in 93 Posts
|
Eco-look?
Why does eco-ternative vehicles have to be so distinctively geeky looking. There must be some alternative marketing edict that it must look that part. The 'genius' market needs a Jonathan Ive vehicle designer. There is still hope, he appreciates (Aston Martins) & loves transportation design.
Tesla had to borrow from Lotus. Designer Fisker has at least put on very tasty & fashionable clothes on his designs.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to botsapper For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-24-2012, 02:44 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Efficiency Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Province of Québec
Posts: 459
Thanks: 107
Thanked 75 Times in 62 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
01-24-2012, 10:42 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,940
Thanks: 513
Thanked 501 Times in 306 Posts
|
I think that they need to let a talented designer adjust the surface "graphics" and maybe even improve the aero a bit. And like a lot of unusual, out-of-the-ordinary cars (the Aptera and Edison2 come to mind) they look a lot better in person than they do in still pictures.
And yes, we have a thread on this car. By the way, before we get too picky -- it is about the second or third most efficient 4 seat cars ever made. That is quite impressive accomplishment. It is also incredibly quick -- 0-60 in something like 5 seconds, and four wheel drive, too.
|
|
|
|
01-25-2012, 12:07 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sw Washington (state), a little north of Vancouver
Posts: 702
Thanks: 177
Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts
|
I'm sorry. In nice language it
looks like a MUTT!
A Citroen 2CV got together with a Smart car! Ouch on the eyes!!!
Are those ghastly things surrounding the door handles exterior side protection
crash bars, or someone's idea of style??
EE--Gads...!!!!!
The Aztek, and the Pacer look like showgirl's in comparison!
|
|
|
|
01-25-2012, 07:28 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Absent without leave.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Englishman living in Scotland
Posts: 3,365
Thanks: 168
Thanked 250 Times in 187 Posts
|
I like it, the rear could be more consistently integrated but overall it looks quite good - like the iMEV (and relatives) should have looked.
__________________
No longer here. Bye, and good luck to all.
|
|
|
|
02-09-2012, 10:35 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sw Washington (state), a little north of Vancouver
Posts: 702
Thanks: 177
Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts
|
[IMG]  [/I
MG] Does this look more natural?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to larrybuck For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-10-2012, 09:38 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 1,062
Thanks: 67
Thanked 63 Times in 33 Posts
|
Nawww, THAT ain't ugly, THIS is ugly;

|
|
|
|
|