Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hybrids
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-10-2011, 11:45 AM   #1 (permalink)
60+ mpg at posted speeds
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 1,190

Black and Green - '98 Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 64.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 384
Thanked 166 Times in 113 Posts
The ultimate hybrid engine swap

Things will change in the not-too-distant future, and imagine your engine swap studies then: New engine shakes up auto industry - Technology & science - Innovation - msnbc.com


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2011, 03:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Sure- where do I buy one? Same place that has Sterling engines on the shelf?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 12:43 PM   #3 (permalink)
60+ mpg at posted speeds
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 1,190

Black and Green - '98 Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 64.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 384
Thanked 166 Times in 113 Posts
Aww, but this isn't a unicorn. It's a genuine invention, which I'm sure will be brought to market ASAP...
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 12:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 2,878

honda cb125 - '74 CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Civic VX
Thanks: 390
Thanked 222 Times in 191 Posts
Has anyone looked up the patents on this thing? so far I haven't seen one working or even a clear image of how it works.
It sounds simple enough that someone with a machine shop should be able to build one and test it, altho because of patents they would not be able to sell it on the open market.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 06:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Mars
Posts: 67

Helga - '00 520d Wagon
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
I sure hope they get the thing going, but I have doubts on their grasp of reality, at least when it comes to numbers. For instance:

"Researchers estimate the new model could shave almost 1,000 pounds off a car's weight currently taken up by conventional engine systems."

Are they serious, 1000 pounds? A 4.4l V8 that I know of weighs 350lbs...

And sure standard car engines have "15% efficiency in average", but nowadays cars have start & stop features and diesels achieve around 40% efficiency on optimum loads.

And this is still a prototype and must prove itself a gazillion times in the real world before we may have it in our cars.
A microturbine application (think LincVolt) with some exhaust heat recovery can practically match all of these claims and it is doable today.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 07:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowglider View Post
"Researchers estimate the new model could shave almost 1,000 pounds off a car's weight currently taken up by conventional engine systems."

Are they serious, 1000 pounds? A 4.4l V8 that I know of weighs 350lbs...
1000 pounds is a lot, but if you can drastically reduce engine weight, size, and fuel consumption, you also get significant side benefits.
The car's structure can be smaller, thus lighter. Just look at the relative size of the hood / engine compartment on most cars.
It doesn't have to carry a heavy engine, making the structure lighter again.
This in turn means a lighter suspension.
It'd only need a small fuel tank, more weight being shed.


Big powerful engine options come at a cost - not just to those who buy them, but also to the folks who buy the more moderate version of a given model that are still engineered and built to handle the more powerful, heavier engines.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com