Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-18-2011, 10:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 31

Dodge Neon - '04 Neon SE
90 day: 39.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Underdrive Pulley Question

I have been doing alot of research on this modification. Some say it will increase mileage some say it wont. All say it will not pay for itself. But my question is this: I am having the timing belt replaced in my neon and the mechanic that is doing the work said he would install the underdrive pulley for free (if I bought it) since he has to pull the stock pulley to replace the timing belt. The pulley I am buying comes with replacement belts too.

My commute is 50miles each way (25,000miles/year), so even a small (1 MPG, 2.5%) fuel economy increase would be beneficial.

So, since the installation is free, and belts need to be replaced anyway, would you install the $130 underdrive pulley?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 11:03 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 5,674

Daox's Paseo - '97 Paseo
Team Toyota
Last 3: 53.99 mpg (US)

Daox's Prius - '04 Prius
90 day: 54.91 mpg (US)

CM400E - '81 CM400E
Thanks: 185
Thanked 431 Times in 298 Posts
I agree with the general consensus. It will improve mileage an imperceivable amount, and it will never pay for itself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 11:27 AM   #3 (permalink)
I are aerodynamic kitteh!
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 625

2000 Fiat Dakota Quad Cab - '00 Dakota Quad Cab SLT
90 day: 18.33 mpg (US)

Dakota A-B-A HAI - '00 Dakota Quad Cab SLT
90 day: 19.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 219
Thanked 150 Times in 86 Posts
I am going to install one on my truck soon. At that point, I will use the ScanGauge to determine if there's a noticeable increase in FE.
__________________

2000 Dodge Dakota Quad Cab
2002 Chrysler Sebring Convertible GTC with transplanted 3.5L LH engine
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 11:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
V8 guy
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico
Posts: 632

Sub - '84 Suburban C10
Pickups

camaro - '85 Camaro Z28
Thanks: 8
Thanked 47 Times in 42 Posts
You could just about break even.
Since you drive a lot of highway miles you are better tailoring the engine set up your use.
If you did all city driving you would want to leave the stock size pully on.

My metric on weather or not I do a MPG mod is $250 (absolute max) per MPG.
I like to spend $200 or a lot less if possible when picking up an MPG.
I will also spend $20 per horse power (as long as it doesn't effect low end torque or fuel economy). Or up to $20 to pick up each ft.lb of torque on the low to mid range only.
I like to spend a lot less if possible on these too.

So $130 for a possible 1MPG, yeah I would do it given the low price and unproven pay off. I think driving tons of highway miles you have a better chance of pay off.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 11:59 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 31

Dodge Neon - '04 Neon SE
90 day: 39.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am leaning towards ordering it. I have not really seen any quantitative results, unless someone on here has installed one, but I couldn't find it searching.

If I get it, we will see if there are any improvements. My commute is pretty consistent and so is my mileage (check my fuel log graph). Anything from 2% (1mpg) or greater should be pretty easy to see. Might even be able to see a 1%.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
So $130 for a possible 1MPG, yeah I would do it given the low price and unproven pay off. I think driving tons of highway miles you have a better chance of pay off.
That is exactly what I was thinking. @$3.50/gallon a 1 MPG improvement would give me a payoff in 30 months. But the REAL savings is the reduction in greenhouse gasses, a little bit here and a little bit there.

Seriously though, its not ALWAYS about the money is it?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 10:59 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 31

Dodge Neon - '04 Neon SE
90 day: 39.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, I ordered one. We will see the results once I get it installed.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 11:25 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 2,878

honda cb125 - '74 CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Civic VX
Thanks: 390
Thanked 222 Times in 191 Posts
Belts are more efficient when they are going over larger, not smaller pulleys, under drive pulleys were made popular in racing, where the engine is running close to red line.
My understanding is that a slower turning alternator is going to be putting out less power so it is more or less going to be maxed out more of the time, so I would like to know if people who have under drive pulleys need to replace their alternator more often, because that would be an issue I would keep an eye on.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 11:55 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hickory, NC
Posts: 31

Dodge Neon - '04 Neon SE
90 day: 39.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes, I realize from my research that there should be almost no savings from the Alternator, but I have got to think that there will be some savings from the Power Steering. At highway speeds (which is 95%+ of my daily commute) the power steering isn't doing much work at all. But there are still parasitic losses that will be reduced from under driving. To what extent no one seems to know.

I haven't seen any ABA tests for underdrive pulleys, nor have I seen anyone on this forum who has tried one. So it looks like savings estimates are just an educated guess. If there ends up being no savings, then I am out about $120.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 01:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,278

Clean Green Toaster Machine - '06 xB
90 day: 45.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 193 Times in 127 Posts
Keep us informed of your results. I doubt you'll see any improvement in fuel economy, but appreciate your efforts to find the answer for the rest of us.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.4 mpg avg over 30,375 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
Clean Green Toaster Machine
45.8 mpg over 2235 miles, 164% of '08 EPA
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 05:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
Driving the TurboWeasel
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 458
Thanks: 14
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
The UDP might be lighter, so it's easier to spin. Way back when, I installed a lightened stock-size pulley on my old Hyundai. Custom-made piece. The engine did rev easier, and my gas mileage went up a little bit on highway trips on flat land.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com