Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-29-2008, 12:22 AM   #1 (permalink)
Who
UnderModded
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 319

Pablo - '07 Santa Fe AWD
90 day: 23.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Units of Measure

I'd love it if 2 units of measure came to the forefront.

MPS meters per second

25 MPS = 90 KPH = 56 MPH

It always seemed strange to measure velocity over the course of an hour. To me miles per hour should indicate some kind of average rather than being expressed as the current rate. On some level, a police car should have to follow you for an hour...


WPM watts per meter

How many watts does it take to go each meter? Which would be the same as kilowatts per kilometer. This would allow different forms of transportation to be more easily comparable.

If I use 180 watts to go 35 KPH on my bike, it's 0.005 WPM or KWpKM. Not sure of the litres/gallons to watts factor to compare it to driving but you get the idea and it allows the electric to all get factored in (well maybe not keeping your car in a heated garage so that the bearings actually want to turn on mornings like today <g>).

I think that 5 LHK would be about 0.44 WPM and 11 LHK would be around 1 WPM.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2008, 09:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 278
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Just on the second one I have always though some measure including energy , weight and distance should make more sense.
My suggestion is to have a rating showing the energy in Killowatts needed to shift one kilogramme a distance of one kilometer.

Although this rating is not perfect it helps consumers to compare diesels to petrol cars and it can also help determine which is the more efficient mode of travel.

Cheers , Pete.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 03:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: appleton wi, for now
Posts: 363

pontiac trans am - '00 firebird trans am

jeep 1 - '02 wrangler
90 day: 16.76 mpg (US)

jeep 2 - '07 wrangler x
90 day: 19.39 mpg (US)

Toyota - '09 Corolla lx
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
verry interesting write up... definitely causes the reader to think about some stuff. the mph /kph has never bothered me though because i travel long distances so i am on the road for hours at a time.. although that is why i like average speed gauges.. i saw the title and was thinking it might be someone (like me) complaining about the us standard of measurement... but thats a rant for another thread.

i agree that there should be a measurement standard for energy/distance... definitely a good thought
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2008, 04:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Quebec City
Posts: 1,377

The Truck (Retired) - '99 A3 Jetta TDI
90 day: 62.27 mpg (US)

The Guzzler - '08 Elantra GL
90 day: 32.95 mpg (US)

The Green Machine - '00 A4 Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
The reason we're working in xPH may be that the distance you can cover in an hour is more relevant than the distance you can cover in one second.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY Frontal Area Measurement newtonsfirstlaw DIY / How-to 3 12-01-2008 01:24 PM
Using Google Earth to measure odometer accuracy MetroMPG DIY / How-to 0 11-28-2007 07:34 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com