Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2011, 07:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
Green Turd
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Walworth wi
Posts: 14

Green turd - '93 Tercel
90 day: 36.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Vacume guage

Hi all, names spencer, new to this forum and new to all forums... I have a 93 tercel... I call it my green turd. I just put in a vacume gauge and was wondering why it says good economy when the rpms are high and poor when the rpms are low?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 02:37 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 213

Toothless - '94 Del Sol Si VTEC
Team Honda
90 day: 30.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
An engine is typically most efficient running around 80% load at the RPM it produces peak torque at (most power per amount of fuel). Unfortunately, most cars have very over-sized engines and can't run at the optimal rpm at that load because they accelerate quickly out of it.

Welcome to the forum!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (12-29-2011)
Old 12-29-2011, 08:05 AM   #3 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 580

Princess - '92 MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
90 day: 33.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
The people who make those things simply don't know what they are doing.
__________________



Remember, even if you win the rat race - you're still a rat.

2010: 454.92L for 5313.90km => 8.56L/100km (27.5MPG US) (5 months)
2011: 606.11L for 7754.04km => 7.82L/100km (30.1MPG US) (Full year)
2012: 170.10L for 2405.00km => 7.07L/100km (33.3MPG US) (In progress)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 08:39 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,940

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.22 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 30.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 501 Times in 306 Posts
Vacuum also depends on the load on the engine; not just the RPM.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2011, 07:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
My dad used to put vacuum gauges in his cars - 1970s Toyota - and they properly indicated efficient and inefficient driving (regarding consumption, not HP for the gallon).

Mind you, they liked engine braking (going all in the dark green) even though that's somewhat inefficient
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2011, 05:01 PM   #6 (permalink)
Green Turd
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Walworth wi
Posts: 14

Green turd - '93 Tercel
90 day: 36.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the advice... So my goal it to not bury the needle? But when is a good time to shift? To soon and there is too much load...not soon enough and there is too much rpm...? Also I have open up my exhaust... No cat and no muffler...is that too much? I can't tell because I've been doing to many mods to quick to tell what is better. Im only on my third tank since I've found out about hypermilling. In three weeks I've done a list of mods
1. Driving behavior
2. Kill switch
3. Full grill block
4. Side mirrors delete
5. Hot air intake
6. Pizza pan wheel covers
7. Weight reduction (still plenty to go) strip it all
8. No ac or power steering
9. Light seals
10. Vacume gauge
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 09:12 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpencersGreenTurd View Post
Thanks for the advice... So my goal it to not bury the needle? But when is a good time to shift? To soon and there is too much load...not soon enough and there is too much rpm...?
The vac gauge always indicated rather poor results when accelerating.
Even on slow accelerations it'd quickly slip over to the bad side.
I tried to keep the needle out of the red end during acceleration - it went from dark green, light green, yellow, orange, red - and I definitely tried to keep it from hitting the bottom peg.

Try to find the point on the gas pedal where pressing it down further doesn't give extra acceleration, then back off and try to stay away a bit from that point.

Acceleration is always a loss, so try to avoid it as much as possible - unless you're going for Pulse & Glide.
The gain of not slowing down, is in not having to accelerate again.
When you have to, accelerate at lower rpm with a good bit of throttle and get it over with quickly - but not flat out or pedal to the metal.

Low(ish) rpm and rather high load puts the engine in it's most efficient operating area - best Brake (HP) Specific Fuel Consumption or BSFC - where it produces most HP for the fuel it gets.
That's most efficient at converting fuel to power - but it's not giving the best mileage !

At cruising speed, your engine is far from operating at its most efficient. Fortunately, it also needs to produce so little power to maintain speed that fuel consumption over distance becomes good.

Quote:
Also I have open up my exhaust... No cat and no muffler...is that too much?
Probably too loud too

That's a performance mod.
To be effective it needs to be matched on the air intake and fuel supply end as well ... effective at delivering power and power/gallon but not fuel economy.
Most of the time you don't need much power anyway.

Quote:
I can't tell because I've been doing to many mods to quick to tell what is better.
You should see your average improve considerably in short time though.
Finetuning parts of the driving can come later.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2012, 04:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
Green Turd
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Walworth wi
Posts: 14

Green turd - '93 Tercel
90 day: 36.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks...that great stuff. I look forward to the challenges of this new hobby!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com