Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-07-2017, 10:46 PM   #71 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 7,095
Thanks: 1,420
Thanked 2,408 Times in 1,876 Posts
It's complicated. The donor vehicle is on a 1971 pan, with the ball-joint front end, but the rear trailing arms have been boxed butchered to the point I can't even get shock absorbers on it. It seems easiest to swap out the trailing arms and use the swing axles.

I could convert to double jointed axles, then with traverse leaf or quarter elliptic springs I could suck the rear tires in and make my dream vehicle:


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-07-2017, 11:43 PM   #72 (permalink)
ScanGauge <3
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: CID
Posts: 201

Winter Sacrifice - '96 Subaru Outback
Subaru
90 day: 24.31 mpg (US)
Thanks: 109
Thanked 60 Times in 46 Posts
When life hands you lemons...
__________________



Best tank (so far): 32 MPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 01:00 AM   #73 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 7,095
Thanks: 1,420
Thanked 2,408 Times in 1,876 Posts
...you make lemon-shaped cars.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2017, 05:44 PM   #74 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Radium Springs, NM
Posts: 286

Ford XLT Naked - '14 Ford F-150 XLT
90 day: 15.04 mpg (US)

Ford G-4 with Stinger - '14 Ford F-150 4X4 Super Crew XLT
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Ford Stealth G-4 - '14 Ford F-150 4X4 Super Crew XLT
90 day: 17.38 mpg (US)

XLT Towing Keystone 5th wheel trailer - '14 Ford Keystone 5th Wheel XLT
90 day: 9.78 mpg (US)

2015 C Max Energi - '15 Ford C Max Energi SWP
90 day: 39.62 mpg (US)

Local D 2015 C-Max Energi - '15 Ford C-Max Energy SEL
90 day: 54.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 379 Times in 183 Posts
Certainly higher mpg standards are doable. Electric drive technology which is on its way to becoming mainstream makes 100 mpg equivalent routine. Within several more years people will look at ICE driven cars as quaint and outmoded. Giving the automakers what they want now will only retard progress and set America back again. Having more fuel inefficient vehicles in our mix will only cause the price of gasoline to rise.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2017, 10:16 AM   #75 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 0
Thanked 382 Times in 343 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerostealth View Post
Certainly higher mpg standards are doable.
Yes, some higher standards are doable, but the weight penalty inherent to some safety features required to "federalize" a random vehicle make it more difficult.


Quote:
Electric drive technology which is on its way to becoming mainstream makes 100 mpg equivalent routine. Within several more years people will look at ICE driven cars as quaint and outmoded.
I'm not sure if electric drive is going to become mainstream so soon at all, but certainly some mild-hybrid capabilities and features like regenerative braking and electric assist are likely to become mainstream sooner.


Quote:
Giving the automakers what they want now will only retard progress and set America back again. Having more fuel inefficient vehicles in our mix will only cause the price of gasoline to rise.
What has set America back were those policies that favored SUVs and larger minivans classified as "light trucks" in order to bypass emissions and fuel-efficiency standards. And then, some safety standards implemented by NHTSA seem quite likely to have been set to eliminate competition from the Japanese automakers and their forward-control vans.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
RedDevil (02-09-2017)
Old 02-09-2017, 03:14 PM   #76 (permalink)
Adrift in the slow lane
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 1,956

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 52.65 mpg (US)

It - '09 Hyundai I10 Active Cool
Team Hyundai
90 day: 28.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 635
Thanked 749 Times in 482 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
What has set America back were those policies that favored SUVs and larger minivans classified as "light trucks" in order to bypass emissions and fuel-efficiency standards. And then, some safety standards implemented by NHTSA seem quite likely to have been set to eliminate competition from the Japanese automakers and their forward-control vans.
That says it all.
Car makers would benefit. Vehicle makers will suffer.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, UG, partial LGB, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop).
lifetime FE over 0.1 GigaMeter or 61 KiloMile

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 01:17 AM   #77 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,773
Thanks: 870
Thanked 360 Times in 256 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler View Post
Crude oil will pass peak and start getting more and more expensive. We will have done not enough to replace it or our obsolete economic paradigm and be caught in an energy trap where it is too expensive to do anything about it.
I think the problem is that we've hit the "easy oil" peak already. The aftershocks from 2008 prove this... shale oil and other alternatives have a built-in inflexibility in the cost of prospecting and extraction that is at odds with what the global economy can afford at this point.

We'll only get a clearer picture when the cheap oil glut created by the previous Saudi oil minister's decision to dump oil two years back clears up. Then we can see what the market can really afford.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
What has set America back were those policies that favored SUVs and larger minivans classified as "light trucks" in order to bypass emissions and fuel-efficiency standards. And then, some safety standards implemented by NHTSA seem quite likely to have been set to eliminate competition from the Japanese automakers and their forward-control vans.
Protectionist policies like that have virtually ensured that no American made car is competitive outside the home market. Not unless it's an American-branded car that's actually designed and built outside the USA.

Last edited by niky; 02-17-2017 at 01:26 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2017, 12:48 PM   #78 (permalink)
V8 guy
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 4,273

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 94
Thanked 953 Times in 696 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Cummins tried coating. It ate through and around the coatings. They tried steel but that wore the cylinder bores out something like twice as fast and the increased reciprocating mass reduced efficiency and caused problems balancing the engine power assembles on some engines.
The best way to burn relatively untreated or lightly treated bio gas is in a gas turbine since they are made with high alloy steels that are very corrosion resistant or boilers, it also helps that boilers and gas turbines burn the gas as soon as it enters the engine.
I work with bio gas and I know people who work at the Cummins R&D plant here in clovis so I have a real good idea what it does.
Remember how some people were saying how wonderful bio gas is?
The boiler where I work that burns 25% bio gas to 75% natural gas is leaking again. Last year I thought the boiler got a full retube for almost $30,000.
Well it turns out they only retubed half the boiler, not through whole thing like I thought.
Well now some of the old tubes that were not leaking have started leaking.
So they bought another 800hp boiler because they learned during the retube job last year they just can't operate on two 1,200hp boilers since the last round of plant expansions.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1985 chevy camaro mostly stock.
  Reply With Quote
Old Today, 09:46 AM   #79 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 4,527
Thanks: 0
Thanked 382 Times in 343 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by niky View Post
Protectionist policies like that have virtually ensured that no American made car is competitive outside the home market. Not unless it's an American-branded car that's actually designed and built outside the USA.
Actually, some newer models from Cadillac and Lincoln do look competitive towards their European and Japanese contenders. The problem is that American cars and light commercial vehicles became somewhat more "specialized" either in exercizes of gross excess or some luxury-oriented landyachts that may justify the higher cost of designing and manufacturing in America while their counterparts developed in other countries have a broader appeal.
  Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:03 PM   #80 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 7,095
Thanks: 1,420
Thanked 2,408 Times in 1,876 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by niky
Protectionist policies like that have virtually ensured that no American made car is competitive outside the home market.
Tesla?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com