Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-10-2009, 12:39 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Eugene, OR, USA
Posts: 65
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
Wow, 0.40? That's horrible, and it's multiplied by a very large frontal area. I bet were it not for macho truck buyers, Ford would build an F150 with a minivan-style, rounded front end, rear seats narrower and with less headroom than the front seats, a Prius-shaped tonneau cover, and a Cd of 0.30. Basically a giant Prius that can tow 5000 lbs and haul a few thousand pounds in the bed.
Narrow rear seats with less headroom? Sorry, no. Why have the back seats at all if they can't fit 3 full size adults across the width? Most people seeking the extra seat of a crew cab have a crew to put in them. Kids grow. Back seats need to accommodate full size adults in the full size pickup market because there really aren't any other options besides a closed off SUV or simply forgoing the passenger capacity altogether.

I don't buy for a second that anybody but little people are comfortable in the back of a Prius. Wasted seats IMO.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 12:47 AM   #12 (permalink)
chop suey
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 6,641

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 559
Thanked 690 Times in 491 Posts
I ain't little but I rode in the back seat of a Prius once. IIRC it was comfortable.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 02:55 PM   #13 (permalink)
ALS
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
Mythbusters did a piece on pickups and MPG with the tailgate.
Wait to you hear him call off the gallons per hour that beast is using at 55 mph. Definitely shows how minimal changes with the bed and tailgate can effect the fuel economy.

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 03:14 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,121

The Geo - '93 Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 37 Times in 34 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snax View Post
Narrow rear seats with less headroom? Sorry, no. Why have the back seats at all if they can't fit 3 full size adults across the width? Most people seeking the extra seat of a crew cab have a crew to put in them. Kids grow. Back seats need to accommodate full size adults in the full size pickup market because there really aren't any other options besides a closed off SUV or simply forgoing the passenger capacity altogether.

I don't buy for a second that anybody but little people are comfortable in the back of a Prius. Wasted seats IMO.
Back seats of the Prius are plenty big, i'm not sure where you are coming from.
____________________________
Mythbusters IS NOT SCIENCE, stop sourcing them for facts. They entertain, they do not get paid to do science they get paid to entertain. There basis on testing that truck is so messed up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 03:25 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 3,743

Mica Blue - '05 xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)

Josepha - '08 xD
90 day: 30.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 414 Times in 257 Posts
Hi,

I'm 6'-4" and my brother is a little over 6'-6" and my son was 5'-2" -- and all three of us fit relatively comfortably in the back seat of a '05 Prius.

It is not a small backseat...
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2009, 11:38 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Eugene, OR, USA
Posts: 65
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Alright, color me informed about the Prius now, (I still have my doubts) but my point about the back seats of pickups still stands in terms of many of those who seek the full accomodation of a crew cab.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 09:43 AM   #17 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,232

Zombie Insight - '00 Insight MT
Team Honda
90 day: 62.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 79
Thanked 236 Times in 172 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snax View Post
Narrow rear seats with less headroom? Sorry, no. Why have the back seats at all if they can't fit 3 full size adults across the width? Most people seeking the extra seat of a crew cab have a crew to put in them. Kids grow. Back seats need to accommodate full size adults in the full size pickup market because there really aren't any other options besides a closed off SUV or simply forgoing the passenger capacity altogether.

I don't buy for a second that anybody but little people are comfortable in the back of a Prius. Wasted seats IMO.
This is exactly the kind of all-or-nothing thinking that results in people daily-driving pickup trucks in the first place. Because you're afraid you might someday come across a task your truck can't accomplish, you buy the biggest, tallest, fastest, thirstiest truck you can, and you just end up commuting in it anyway.

How bad would it be to have a front bench that seats three adults, and a rear bench that seats either two adults or three children?

But pickup truck should not be used to transport children. That's what cars are for.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 10:31 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / SC
Posts: 620

1 Ton - '94 C3500
90 day: 19.26 mpg (US)

Big White Brick - '03 Express Van
90 day: 15.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 64
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
This is exactly the kind of all-or-nothing thinking that results in people daily-driving pickup trucks in the first place. Because you're afraid you might someday come across a task your truck can't accomplish, you buy the biggest, tallest, fastest, thirstiest truck you can, and you just end up commuting in it anyway.

How bad would it be to have a front bench that seats three adults, and a rear bench that seats either two adults or three children?

But pickup truck should not be used to transport children. That's what cars are for.
That's why I use the 1ton STANDARD cab to tow my 14000 trailer and haul people in the Saturn.
15mpg is not for hauling 200lb people around !!!
Drives me nuts when i see 1 person in business dress clothes in an empty full-size pick-up commuting.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 11:51 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Eugene, OR, USA
Posts: 65
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
This is exactly the kind of all-or-nothing thinking that results in people daily-driving pickup trucks in the first place. Because you're afraid you might someday come across a task your truck can't accomplish, you buy the biggest, tallest, fastest, thirstiest truck you can, and you just end up commuting in it anyway.
much truth to that, however . .

Quote:
How bad would it be to have a front bench that seats three adults, and a rear bench that seats either two adults or three children?

But pickup truck should not be used to transport children. That's what cars are for.
That part is unrealistic for many. While we ended up selling our supercrew for the forementioned reasons, we had legitimate need for the number and size of the seating area. We weren't silly enough to forego the middle front seat either - which I believe is still available in the new F-150. (But we have obviously found the same number of seats in our Mazda 5.) The fact remains however, that the extra cost of a supercrew vs. a regular or extra cab in the same class and size pickup is miniscule in terms of economy - and neither of the latter would have worked for us at all without the extra expense of a third vehicle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 12:18 PM   #20 (permalink)
ALS
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
When I need a Pickup truck I call Enterprise Rent a car. $39.95 a day plus gas.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/video-2009-ford-f-150-aerodynamics-wind-tunnel-10414.html
Posted By For Type Date
Sources Say: Ford Planning Innovative Changes Aimed at Fuel Efficiency in Next F-150 - PickupTrucks.com News This thread Refback 11-14-2010 04:11 PM
Refereri - adrese complete - 12.10.2009 - www.autoshortnews.com This thread Refback 10-13-2009 01:57 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inside GMs Aerodynamics wind tunnel video rav Aerodynamics 8 12-22-2008 04:31 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com