Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2011, 09:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Columbus, Ga
Posts: 45

Whitey - '010 Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 29.44 mpg (US)

Wife's - '010 Clubman
90 day: 36.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
warm air V. cold air intakes

how comes warm air intakes are listed as an ecomod but not cold air? Don't both strategies increase Fuel Economy?


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 09:36 AM   #2 (permalink)
60+ mpg at posted speeds
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 1,190

Black and Green - '98 Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 64.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 384
Thanked 166 Times in 113 Posts
maybe

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPGranger View Post
how comes warm air intakes are listed as an ecomod but not cold air? Don't both strategies increase Fuel Economy?
Depends on the car, its sensors, driving technique, and the design of the intake--seems to me. My WAI works. I have long wondered about a CAI. I think one reason for the WAI in colder climes is for warm up and for dealing with denser colder air of winter. I would think a CAI would work for accelerating with load as long as you were also using EOC to reap the benefit of the shorter pulse through a longer glide.
__________________


Black and Green will be rebuilt over decades as parts die--until it becomes a different car. Goal is only 60-70 mpg at posted speeds. I'm not trying for highest possible mileage.

Calculators: standard deviation, Ohms Law, & drag HP losses.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 01:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: northern california
Posts: 1,362

The Q - '02 Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 331
Thanked 183 Times in 127 Posts
PLEASE, search.

there are dozens of threads about this EXACT topic.
__________________
ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First, Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Second, Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

third, rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip! http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 03:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
V8 guy
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico
Posts: 632

Sub - '84 Suburban C10
Pickups

camaro - '85 Camaro Z28
Thanks: 8
Thanked 47 Times in 42 Posts
Its all about being able to hit a target temperature and pressure.
In a spark ignition engine you want to get your air fuel mixture as hot and under as much pressure as possible before lighting it with the spark plug.
If you get the air too hot the air fuel mixture could preignite and that would hurt fuel fuel economy and power.
Most vehicles in factory form stay well below that temperature and pressure preignition threshold.
This is one of those mods you really want to A-B-A test to make sure you dont hurt fuel economy.

The next gasoline engine I build I will get the temperature and compression into that ideal range by raising the compression ratio up to about 12:1, using a cold air intake.

A diesel engine is a little different. You always want a cold air intake, the diesels seem to respond best to cramming as much gaseous mass into the cylinder as possible. That is why deleting the EGR and running water mist injection works so well.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L high compression diesel.
New engine is in and should be good for 29mpg highway.
1985 chevy camaro mostly stock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2011, 06:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 62

2005 Dakota - '05 Dakota SLT
90 day: 15.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It also depends on temperatures of the engine and outside.
If your engine is getting so warm that it is reducing timing or feeding extra fuel in order to decrease temperatures, then you would be better off with a CAI. This would be the case if it's 90* outside and you have a full grill block.

If it's 40* outside and you have no blocks... a HAI is obviously the choice. Faster warmups will be key here.

REALLY IMPORTANT!!!!! The best improvement in BOTH cases is simply correct construction. There are calculators out there on the interwebs that can help you calculate correct length and diameters of your intake. If this is done correctly, you can worry about having it be a HAI/CAI after that.

Also... What I do, since here in Chicago areas, we have -20 in winter and 120 in summer, I simply made a shield (currently under development and testing) to block or allow engine heat. I also made it so it keeps my engine computer cool in all conditions since it's near the intake that I have made.

So far.... seems that a combination is the best solution for me. My truck gets too hot in the summer, and since I tow often enough, a HAI is just not an option during the summer.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com