03-08-2011, 06:52 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 580
Thanks: 7
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
|
Are we abusing alcohol?
I was thinking of an alternate method of using ethanol in vehicles. Instead of just mixing it with the gasoline, one would have separate tanks, one for straight ethanol and one for straight gas. The fuel system would be separate up to and including the injectors. At a certain load (or signal from a knock sensor) the engine would swich fuels.
The higher octane rating of pure alcohol would enable us to do such things as increase compression ratio and boost, and possibly downsize the engine. As a result not only would we have better efficiency while burning ethanol, we'd have better efficiency while burning gasoline aswell.
Thoughts?
__________________
Remember, even if you win the rat race - you're still a rat.
2010: 454.92L for 5313.90km => 8.56L/100km (27.5MPG US) (5 months)
2011: 606.11L for 7754.04km => 7.82L/100km (30.1MPG US) (Full year)
2012: 170.10L for 2405.00km => 7.07L/100km (33.3MPG US) (In progress)
Last edited by jakobnev; 03-08-2011 at 06:52 AM..
Reason: spulling
|
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 09:00 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 2,877
Thanks: 668
Thanked 361 Times in 229 Posts
|
I can imagine the (legal) problems of having alcohol separate from the fuel. When it is mixed with petrol there is no fear that it will be used (or abused) "in other ways". When mixed with fuel alcohol isn't taxed as heavily: While a liter of petrol with 5% ethanol costs just under $2 here, pure alcohol at the liquor store goes for 7-9 times more.
Also, the law here states that " It is illegal to have an open container with alcohol inside the vehicle". Imagine if the alcohol tube sprung a leak and the driver would be breathing the vapors for hours at a time. LOL
Now, legal nuances aside, having a second system paralleling the fuel supply would add complexity and weight (not to mention cost), but may be worth a shot (pun intended).
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 09:45 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 2,878
Thanks: 390
Thanked 222 Times in 191 Posts
|
an engine that is designed for burning alcohol does not work well for burning gasoline and it's the same the other way around, just like you can burn small amounts of diesel in your gasoline engine, it works best to design the compression ratio and timing map to the fuel.
Also at least in the USA alcohol fuels are subsidized by tax dollars because they take so much energy and fuel to produce that it is a net loss.
|
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 10:49 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 208
Thanks: 15
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
E85 can get better mileage & HP than regular gas. Saab has done it, takes a turbo to change the boost depending on fuel. I hope the Cruze will evolve to become flex fuel and smart enough to use it efficiently.
Spending extra on it is better than sending $$ overseas.
Last edited by roosterk0031; 03-08-2011 at 11:07 AM..
|
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 12:00 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,651
Thanks: 31
Thanked 237 Times in 171 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland
Also at least in the USA alcohol fuels are subsidized by tax dollars because they take so much energy and fuel to produce that it is a net loss.
|
Not true, overall (although it can when using the most inefficient farming & production practices) and the people making that claim usually are pretty obvious axe-grinders.
It's also ignoring the fact that a major reason for ethanol in gas is as a pollution-control additive. Remember all the problems with the old MTBE additive?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2011, 12:34 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 723
Thanks: 92
Thanked 60 Times in 42 Posts
|
I'd rather ethanol be based on cellulose rather than feeding Monstrantos GMO patents. For that reason alone I do not support the current ethanol industry, especially with the current process energy balance barely better than petroleum.
__________________

"We think B20 is for suckers" N. Cowell, Denver B100
"Climate change denial is a conclusion in search of a rationalization" labman57
|
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 01:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 208
Thanks: 15
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
What's the difference between giving our energy $$ to big oil or big agribusiness?
I have a ADM ethanol plant a few miles south, a much smaller Penford ethanol plant a few miles north, when I go to work there I see lines for farmers semi's hauling corn in. And another set hauling out cattle feed out. The ethanol $$ are staying local, employing tax paying, home owning American's.
Last edited by roosterk0031; 03-08-2011 at 02:46 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to roosterk0031 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2011, 03:17 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 723
Thanks: 92
Thanked 60 Times in 42 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roosterk0031
What's the difference between giving our energy $$ to big oil or big agribusiness?
I have a ADM ethanol plant a few miles south, a much smaller Penford ethanol plant a few miles north, when I go to work there I see lines for farmers semi's hauling corn in. And another set hauling out cattle feed out. The ethanol $$ are staying local, employing tax paying, home owning American's.
|
(and destroying the food supply)
To answer your question, perhaps none, they both seem hell-bent on eliminating the human infestation on earth, along with most other currently established species. That's why we need to fuel with efficient renewables and not grant patents on genes. We are in far too deep to get out without a great deal of pain.
__________________

"We think B20 is for suckers" N. Cowell, Denver B100
"Climate change denial is a conclusion in search of a rationalization" labman57
|
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 03:18 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
|
Waaaah, the food supply!
Seen any empty store shelves lately? 
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2011, 04:32 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Absent without leave.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Englishman living in Scotland
Posts: 3,365
Thanks: 168
Thanked 250 Times in 187 Posts
|
hic.
__________________
No longer here. Bye, and good luck to all.
|
|
|
|
|