Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-22-2011, 11:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Novice but learning!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Weight saving ideas

Ok, can anyone suggest any weight saving ideas that we might not of thought of? Maybe you will think different to how we do?

Thanks!



(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 12:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nummela (Finland)
Posts: 628

Siitin - '98 Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

Starppa - '96 Starlet
90 day: 35.06 mpg (US)

Aeroscania - '97 P94D 260
90 day: 9.35 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 63.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 76
Thanked 152 Times in 73 Posts
- What is that shiny plate meant for in your exhaust manifold? I would also make the is it headers so that they dont penetrude so much out of the frontal area. Also if you make it closer to rear wheels you will get more grip.
- Do the series dictate that the rear wing has to be so high? If not lower the "brakects". Also I would close the gaps between those brakets on the spoiler if it is allowed.
- Can you adjust that front spoiler? It looks like its made from aluminium?, because there is so much rivets...
- Looks like your front brakes are regular steel brakes?
- Looks like you havent milled bolt heads shorter?
- What are those black hoses which go to your cam covers? Anyway you could mill some material off from that big blue anodized aluminium "bolt" Its over 80mm long?
- In my opinion your braided steel hoses could be shortened at least 10% by the look of you pictures.

Those are my suggestions.
__________________
www.tuneko.com
Less drag = Less fuel

Last edited by Vekke; 02-22-2011 at 01:28 PM.. Reason: Inserted more ideas
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 03:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 1,924
Thanks: 750
Thanked 135 Times in 84 Posts
If you are serious about weight reduction, you could get another driver that has a smaller frame.
( I'm imagining something like a 98 lb 4'11" woman that likes to race :-) )

I'm sure you have considered that already though. Just thinking out loud.
__________________
"You don't fail until you give up. You learn, and move on." - Christ

" Hypermiling is not going slow, it's driving with more intelligence." - UFO
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 04:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
On one of my bicycles I took off everything that didn't make it go. Off came the smaller chainwheel, front derailleur, kickstand, rack, reflectors... everything except decals and handlebar tape. Look at the bits and think "do they make this thing go?"
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 04:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Regina
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Braided steel hose is way heavy and I see tons of the stuff, lots way high on the chassis- consider hardlines for the majority of the length and smaller flexible connectors if nessicary. Things like dry sump lines or fuel lines that run between two components mounted on the block do not require any flex. Also give consideration to routing & mounting to save length. This exercise took about 10 lbs off our road racer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 05:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
Novice but learning!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vekke View Post
- What is that shiny plate meant for in your exhaust manifold? I would also make the is it headers so that they dont penetrude so much out of the frontal area. Also if you make it closer to rear wheels you will get more grip.
- Do the series dictate that the rear wing has to be so high? If not lower the "brakects". Also I would close the gaps between those brakets on the spoiler if it is allowed.
- Can you adjust that front spoiler? It looks like its made from aluminium?, because there is so much rivets...
- Looks like your front brakes are regular steel brakes?
- Looks like you havent milled bolt heads shorter?
- What are those black hoses which go to your cam covers? Anyway you could mill some material off from that big blue anodized aluminium "bolt" Its over 80mm long?
- In my opinion your braided steel hoses could be shortened at least 10% by the look of you pictures.
Those are my suggestions.
-Plate on headers is purely cosmetic, so we could lose it although its made from very thin ali so is very very light.
-No rules on height of the wing no, but were looking to move it further back.
-We are changing the front end to have a wing right across the front.
-Yeah front brakes are steel, we plan to skim and drill
-the blue bolt and housing are going they weight 2lbs each! were remaking very light weight versions.
-Good point, hoses can be shortened

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 05:29 AM   #7 (permalink)
Novice but learning!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
If you are serious about weight reduction, you could get another driver that has a smaller frame.
( I'm imagining something like a 98 lb 4'11" woman that likes to race :-) )

I'm sure you have considered that already though. Just thinking out loud.
Haha good point!
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 05:29 AM   #8 (permalink)
Novice but learning!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
On one of my bicycles I took off everything that didn't make it go. Off came the smaller chainwheel, front derailleur, kickstand, rack, reflectors... everything except decals and handlebar tape. Look at the bits and think "do they make this thing go?"
Have to admit since this photo we did that and lost 50lbs of weight. Well worth it
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 03:34 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hägar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Are the headers angled upwards on purpose, like to produce downforce ?
If not, point them straight aft.

On WW2 fighter planes, using the exhaust cleverly gained them additional speed.
The exhaust is essentially a jet, generating thrust.
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 04:07 AM   #10 (permalink)
Novice but learning!
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Are the headers angled upwards on purpose, like to produce downforce ?
If not, point them straight aft.

On WW2 fighter planes, using the exhaust cleverly gained them additional speed.
The exhaust is essentially a jet, generating thrust.
Yeah to produce downforce but they are slanted back too,


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com