Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-27-2010, 03:43 PM   #21 (permalink)
MPG>HP
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479

Little Blue - '09 Focus SE
Team Ford
90 day: 34.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Something where you could have a HUD and every single sensor record stuff and upload it to a server or Google docs (in real time).


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 06:06 PM   #22 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertSmalls View Post
*A BSFC map with a blip indicating where you're operating and a vector indicating which way you want to move throttle and RPMs.
+100!

...a visual indication of "...where-the-BEST-FE-is..." and "...where am I driving now..." would go a long way towards teaching drivers about FE on the road.

...something to do with a picture and 1,000 words (ha,ha).
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:50 PM   #23 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 125

'91 CRX - '91 CRX DX
90 day: 34.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
This thread is full of interesting ideas to stea- er... borrow for my arduino project. Keep em coming. ^_^

Already have the HUD and bar graphs figured out btw... Just a matter of the displays (7-segment, 16-segment, bar graph or otherwise), appropriate I2C LED display drivers and a few functions to communicate with them. Communication only takes up two I/O lines and is expandable a bit like USB. If there were some program storage space to spare (maybe go to an Atmega328 chip?), it could probably be tacked onto the MPGuino code.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 02:44 AM   #24 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 17

F.O.R.D - '87 Dakota LE

Oil Monster - '01 Corolla CE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who View Post
More integration with NAV/GPS equipment and the ability to monitor and sense elevation and grade. The ability to remember routes and conditions and which techniques worked best under different scenarios and provide some form of coaching. You'd probably cross some line connecting it to an actual control except maybe the cruise module.

Also the ability to judge forward distances, distance of vehicles behind , sense traffic light pattern and alert when they may change (at least try modeling patterns on those that are on standard routes).
Good lord man! You just described autopilot, not cruise control. While i would love that, it is years away, and i am not holding my breath, rather sighing in dismay.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 02:46 AM   #25 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 17

F.O.R.D - '87 Dakota LE

Oil Monster - '01 Corolla CE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Ooh. Good ideas. How about:
  • The ability to tell you, exactly how much throttle to use to accelerate at maximum efficiency, and suggest when to shift (if it's a manual).
Vacuum gauge. A computer would have to process the information, then relay it with audio. If it had lights, it would be quicker, but the good old vacuum gauge, and a competent user can do this without fancy integrated circuits.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 02:05 PM   #26 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
pardon the humor:

VACUUM GAUGE = mechancial-analog feedback

SCANGAUGE-II = digital-display feedback
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 02:55 PM   #27 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 17

F.O.R.D - '87 Dakota LE

Oil Monster - '01 Corolla CE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
pardon the humor:

VACUUM GAUGE = mechancial-analog feedback

SCANGAUGE-II = digital-display feedback
Pardon my lack of an ability to see your point... I am a huge fan of analog displays. So is a very large portion of the population, and auto manufacturers, considering they have kept the analog tach, speedo, voltmeter, coolant, fuel gauge(which admittedly would be very nice to have a digital percentage rather than a needle), and various other instruments.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2012, 06:55 PM   #28 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...has nothing to do with their realtime displays, as both are easy to see and understand; however, it's almost impossible to capture & record data from an analog vacuum gauge, but very easy to do so from a digital system.

...and many MPG people like to track/analyze what happens as they strive from better FE.
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 02:49 AM   #29 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 17

F.O.R.D - '87 Dakota LE

Oil Monster - '01 Corolla CE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...has nothing to do with their realtime displays, as both are easy to see and understand; however, it's almost impossible to capture & record data from an analog vacuum gauge, but very easy to do so from a digital system.

...and many MPG people like to track/analyze what happens as they strive from better FE.
I think we are arguing about something ridiculous, they have both available for different reasons, i personally prefer the analog. You can attach a recording device to the OBDII to get your recording, if you choose to use an analog display, or you can get a digital one.
I find analogs to be more reliable, faster, and easier to read, but this is my opinion, and I respect yours.
Nevertheless, a vacuum gauge can, and does provide information that can be used for hypermiling, and if you are on a budget, it is a very cheap implementation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2012, 01:40 PM   #30 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...I believe you haven't read the OP subject of this thread, which is "...What features on your ULTIMATE fuel economy instrumentation?..."

...Hence, the answer(s) revolve around an "instrumentation" system and what "other/new" features people would like to have implemented by that system, with the implied understanding that the (digital) instrumentation system already exists, such as ScanGaugeII™ or Ultragauge™, etc.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M

Last edited by Old Tele man; 04-01-2012 at 03:19 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to calculate MPG / fuel economy formula MetroMPG DIY / How-to 21 06-29-2010 09:37 AM
News: Toyota to provide fuel economy instrumentation in all models MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 13 12-18-2009 06:40 PM
Why SUV fuel economy is so much more important than small car fuel economy... SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 30 02-23-2009 06:26 PM
Nissan raises the bar: networked, onboard, "multiplayer" fuel economy instrumentation MetroMPG Instrumentation 12 02-07-2008 04:01 PM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 11:38 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com