Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-28-2008, 09:16 PM   #11 (permalink)
Box Dreamer
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 154

xB Commuter - '04 xB
90 day: 40.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I agree that low rpm gives best FE for cruising. What I want to point out is, the manufacturer won't build the gear box optimized for cruising for another good reason.

In fact, the question of the topic is wrong. It should be "what is the ideal gear setting to cruise?" Different models cruise at different rpm with top gear and same speed. I want to cruise at 65mph with 2000rpm. However, my car doesn't allow me. @65mph, the top gear is 3250rpm. We want that but doesn't mean we can have it. What we can choose is what gear we are using at the given speed.

Cruising = constant speed =minimum power needed. And, highest gear = lowest rpm = minimum power. So, we should choose highest gear to cruise!!

Of course, we won't cruise at 10mph. Maybe 25mph or 30mph for minimum speed? If the top gear runs, that is ok. Just be careful when you break (easy to kill the engine) or go up hill. When power is needed, shift to lower gear and go, don't stay in top gear in low speed. That won't save any gas. (faster reaching the speed you want, faster starting cruising, faster start to save gas.)

The above case is for flat road. If cruising uphill, depends on the power of the engine, how steep of the hill, and the speed of cruising. Sometimes can't cruise on top gear, then, choose the next highest one.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2008, 09:25 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,479

PaleCivic - '96 Civic DX Sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 74.33 mpg (US)
Thanks: 148
Thanked 138 Times in 97 Posts
I agree. If only our cars would allow us to choose that ideal speed and rpm combination. Too bad.
__________________
- - - - -Best 11-mile commute: 105 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 88.5 mpg / 1133 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2008, 05:16 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,479

PaleCivic - '96 Civic DX Sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 74.33 mpg (US)
Thanks: 148
Thanked 138 Times in 97 Posts
The manual will give the best "good enough for everyone" answer. Lower than what they recommend will usually give better performance.
__________________
- - - - -Best 11-mile commute: 105 mpg
- - - - -Best tank: 88.5 mpg / 1133 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 11:58 AM   #14 (permalink)
PaleMelanesian's Disciple
 
hummingbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Noida, UP, India
Posts: 194

City - '04 City iDSI EXi
90 day: 47.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Would it be nice to substitute the top gear with one that allows the cruising speed (would never be really 'high', for any ecomodder worth his coroplast) to be achieved at 1k RPM? one would briskly accelerate to the target speed, and then moves into this special 'cruise gear'. Of course it is assumed that the steady state power requirement for this cruise is available from the engine at 1k rpm, with < 80% throttle.

Would this be better than P&G'ing all the way through?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 02:58 PM   #15 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,032

pimp mobile - '81 gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 156
Thanked 259 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian View Post
I agree. If only our cars would allow us to choose that ideal speed and rpm combination. Too bad.
Yah, oh wait, this is a modder site!! Get out your wrenches!
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2009, 04:11 PM   #16 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Seems to me it depends more on piston speed than rpm.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Scangauge II vs cruise control rjacob Instrumentation 10 06-02-2011 02:36 PM
Idea: hypermiling cruise control rjacob EcoModding Central 5 04-14-2009 02:17 AM
Can low rpm damage the engine? KiaRio2004 Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 22 01-29-2009 12:03 AM
Cruise control mod idea rjacob DIY / How-to 18 07-29-2008 11:27 PM
MetroMPG.com mailbag: is lowest RPM really best for max MPG with big displacement? MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 20 01-06-2008 01:00 PM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com