Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-30-2013, 09:31 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
What to learn (if anything) from wind tunnel smoke lines images?

Looks like they are becoming marketing tools getting away from aero research.
At the right angle and wind speed any car might look to have a smooth flow.

Besides some obvious and extreme turbulence and separation like this





What can you learn from it?
Does the height/angle difference before vs after the car for the lower smoke line means something?
What about the upper lines?

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Big time For This Useful Post:
Cd (12-03-2013)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-02-2013, 11:04 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big time View Post
Looks like they are becoming marketing tools getting away from aero research.
I agree, but keep in mind that recently taken wind tunnel pictures and videos of +50 year old cars would not be considered research other than in a historic contex anyway.

I think this falls into the "Art" category, similar to having a stone wall, castle, abandoned factory or pretty girl next to the car.

Some of these images are just meant to be cool.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2013, 04:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
"it's all blue smoke and mirrors"

Different information becomes available when you employ curtains of air bubbles in moving water.



They can be used experimentally





That last one might be polarized light.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2013, 06:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
learn

It would be the images never published which would be of greatest value.
If the aerodynamicist is locked into a 'hard styling' protocol,where the finished body must very much resemble what the stylist signed his name to,then the smoke can reveal 'optimization' potential as was done with hundreds of cars now.
A full-scale clay can be altered by master clay modellers right in the wind tunnel and sequential runs made to evaluate any progress.They'll literally camp out at the tunnel,running 24-hours a day until they dial in a shape.
Scale models and CFD aren't able to allow such alteration and evaluation.
Lee Iacocca said that many Chrysler products were saved this way.
What we're allowed are centerline flow images of dubious value.But hey,in the immortal words of Bob Parsons,"they're way out ahead of nothing."
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 12:31 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
Waht about using CFD to design an optimum shape for, say, a small 2 seat, side by side sportscar?

In other words, start with the side by side seating, then design around that. Whatever shape works best for side by side seating, mid engine is fine.

Thoughts?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 02:01 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
doviatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
Who needs CFD or an actual wind tunnel? Just fire up a car photo in a graphics program, load a fuzzy spray brush and paint your own. Make it look as cool, fast, and efficient as you want. I could probably make a brick look sexy fast by drawing my own lines.
How is anyone going to prove this wrong?
This is just eye candy....some are real but the results don't mean anything as they only present the photo that looks the coolest. No raw data, no raw or failed photos, no raw or failed CFD results. No time averaged info....
The visuals are not proof. Raw data can be proof. The data is rarely shown and even the real published data has disclaimers.
Data is not very nice to look at (which is why they draw/select the pretty pictures).
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 02:35 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Quote:
Waht about using CFD to design an optimum shape for, say, a small 2 seat, side by side sportscar?

In other words, start with the side by side seating, then design around that. Whatever shape works best for side by side seating, mid engine is fine.

Thoughts?
I think it's been done. What about CFD models of two vehicles, say the Volkhart-Sagitta and the Lambroghini Egoistica, with equal numbers of vertexes so they can be morphed into all the intermediate shapes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 03:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Big time : Excellent question that I too have wondered about.
Also, why have they done away with tuft testing these days ? Tuft testing shows so much just by looking at the direction of the tufts as well as the flutter.

Good point about the smoke test making any car / truck / car-truck ( SUV ) / brick etc look aerodynamic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 03:26 PM   #9 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
The only time that a smoke test seems useful to me is when they have a situation like this one :

Just look at this truck :

The flow looks almost as smooth as this one ! :
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-04-2013)
Old 12-04-2013, 05:53 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
what about

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto View Post
Waht about using CFD to design an optimum shape for, say, a small 2 seat, side by side sportscar?

In other words, start with the side by side seating, then design around that. Whatever shape works best for side by side seating, mid engine is fine.

Thoughts?
I suspect that today,this is exactly how one would proceed.
I'd start with freebeard's Saggitta and the 1939 Porsche 60K10.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com