07-27-2011, 08:51 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
|
...it's simple, the air dam conteracts the damn air (verbal punnage intended)!
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A
1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Old Tele man For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
07-27-2011, 08:56 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
n00b.... sortof..
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 338
Thanks: 34
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
Lol
__________________
~Mike
|
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 07:51 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Dilatant
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 262
Volvo - '00 V70 XC AWD SE 90 day: 27.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
|
Lips also provide mechanical stiffening to the dam.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to instarx For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-28-2011, 08:50 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Senoia
Posts: 17
Thanks: 7
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyatt
About 2/3 of the way down the page, there is a picture of the underbody of a car. at the car's back end, it should say "Slower Moving Lower Pressure Air" (not higher as it does in the picture).
|
Oops, my bad. I thought you were talking about the first graphic not the second one. But just to ask for clarity as I'm still learning this stuff, when the air speed slows down, doesn't the pressure increase. So if fast moving air (low pressure) slows down because of the diffusers at the back, doesn't the pressure increase?
I thought that's what they were illustrating.
|
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 03:22 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatUpRanger
Oops, my bad. I thought you were talking about the first graphic not the second one. But just to ask for clarity as I'm still learning this stuff, when the air speed slows down, doesn't the pressure increase. So if fast moving air (low pressure) slows down because of the diffusers at the back, doesn't the pressure increase?
I thought that's what they were illustrating.
|
It's a rearward facing surface, so it's not higher pressure just because the airflow is slowing down. Like the top surface of a fastback isn't seeing high pressure.
Last edited by winkosmosis; 07-28-2011 at 03:33 PM..
|
|
|
|
07-28-2011, 04:36 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
|
diffuser
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatUpRanger
Oops, my bad. I thought you were talking about the first graphic not the second one. But just to ask for clarity as I'm still learning this stuff, when the air speed slows down, doesn't the pressure increase. So if fast moving air (low pressure) slows down because of the diffusers at the back, doesn't the pressure increase?
I thought that's what they were illustrating.
|
*If the diffuser angle is within the 2.5-4 degree upsweep,prescribed for diffusers,based on their point of 'origin',the air will remain attached as the air 'climbs' away from the road surface. 
*As this air expands into the larger void,it will simultaneously decelerate and gain static pressure,raising the base pressure of the wake,cutting drag. 
*If the diffuser angle exceeds the prescribed angles for attached flow,the air will immediately separate at the beginning of the diffuser,and the wake will do a 'reach-around',with it's low pressure communicating beneath the diffuser and acting upon its surface to create downforce,with a drag penalty to the car. 
*If suction is applied to a perforated diffuser,as Ferrari is currently doing,the air can be made to follow a steeper ramp angle and burst into the wake region. 
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-28-2011, 05:04 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 484
Thanks: 46
Thanked 62 Times in 36 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis
It's a rearward facing surface, so it's not higher pressure just because the airflow is slowing down. Like the top surface of a fastback isn't seeing high pressure.
|
Exactly. The reason that performance cars want a diffuser is to increase their down-force. If it did the opposite and increased pressure (lifting the car off the ground) they would be avoided at all costs!
Diffusers can reduce the drag experienced by the vehicle. Drag is at it's lowest at ~2.66 (long, delta Cd 0.025) or 3.66 (short, delta Cd 0.02) degrees, and is still better drag-wise compared to having a 0 degree diffuser until at least after 11 degrees (short diffuser, delta Cd 0.007) or 6 degrees (long diffuser, delta Cd 0.013). In both cases, down-force (negative lift) is being increased all the way to the 6 and 11 degree numbers above, and in both cases they max out at delta Clr (coefficient of rear lift) at 0.26 (THIS IS HUGE!). I suppose I should quote Hucho on this one, figure 4.48 in his 4th edition.
What you can see is that a longer diffuser allows more downforce and lower drag than short diffusers.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to wyatt For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2011, 01:58 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyatt
Drag is at it's lowest at ~2.66 (long, delta Cd 0.025) or 3.66 (short, delta Cd 0.02) degrees, and is still better drag-wise compared to having a 0 degree diffuser until at least after 11 degrees (short diffuser, delta Cd 0.007) or 6 degrees (long diffuser, delta Cd 0.013).
|
Unless the vehicle has a squarish rear end (think squared off hatchbacks, station wagons, vans) where any diffusor angle wil increase drag !
|
|
|
|
07-29-2011, 02:42 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Senoia
Posts: 17
Thanks: 7
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
I have soooo much to learn. 
|
|
|
|
07-29-2011, 02:46 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 484
Thanks: 46
Thanked 62 Times in 36 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder
Unless the vehicle has a squarish rear end (think squared off hatchbacks, station wagons, vans) where any diffusor angle wil increase drag !
|
Do you have a reference for this? I have never seen anything (to my recollection) that counters the work shown in Hucho's book. I am not saying you are wrong (since aerodynamics is often counterintuitive even to the experienced), I just can't think of a reason why a diffuser would make things worse. I would actually think the bigger the back end, the more of a positive effect it would have. Thanks.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|