Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-27-2011, 08:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 331 Times in 250 Posts
...it's simple, the air dam conteracts the damn air (verbal punnage intended)!


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
• 2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
• 2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
• 2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
• 2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

• 1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
• 1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
• 1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
• 1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
• 1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Old Tele man For This Useful Post:
d0sitmatr (07-27-2011)
Old 07-27-2011, 08:56 PM   #12 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 338

silver fire - '03 Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 34
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Lol
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 07:51 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Dilatant
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 262

Volvo - '00 V70 XC AWD SE
90 day: 27.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 24 Times in 16 Posts
Lips also provide mechanical stiffening to the dam.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to instarx For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-28-2011), some_other_dave (07-28-2011)
Old 07-28-2011, 08:50 AM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Senoia
Posts: 17

BeatUpRanger - '95 Ranger XLT
Thanks: 7
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyatt View Post
About 2/3 of the way down the page, there is a picture of the underbody of a car. at the car's back end, it should say "Slower Moving Lower Pressure Air" (not higher as it does in the picture).
Oops, my bad. I thought you were talking about the first graphic not the second one. But just to ask for clarity as I'm still learning this stuff, when the air speed slows down, doesn't the pressure increase. So if fast moving air (low pressure) slows down because of the diffusers at the back, doesn't the pressure increase?

I thought that's what they were illustrating.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 03:22 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 29 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatUpRanger View Post
Oops, my bad. I thought you were talking about the first graphic not the second one. But just to ask for clarity as I'm still learning this stuff, when the air speed slows down, doesn't the pressure increase. So if fast moving air (low pressure) slows down because of the diffusers at the back, doesn't the pressure increase?

I thought that's what they were illustrating.

It's a rearward facing surface, so it's not higher pressure just because the airflow is slowing down. Like the top surface of a fastback isn't seeing high pressure.

Last edited by winkosmosis; 07-28-2011 at 03:33 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 04:36 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 3,975
Thanks: 1,179
Thanked 807 Times in 469 Posts
diffuser

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeatUpRanger View Post
Oops, my bad. I thought you were talking about the first graphic not the second one. But just to ask for clarity as I'm still learning this stuff, when the air speed slows down, doesn't the pressure increase. So if fast moving air (low pressure) slows down because of the diffusers at the back, doesn't the pressure increase?

I thought that's what they were illustrating.
*If the diffuser angle is within the 2.5-4 degree upsweep,prescribed for diffusers,based on their point of 'origin',the air will remain attached as the air 'climbs' away from the road surface.
*As this air expands into the larger void,it will simultaneously decelerate and gain static pressure,raising the base pressure of the wake,cutting drag.
*If the diffuser angle exceeds the prescribed angles for attached flow,the air will immediately separate at the beginning of the diffuser,and the wake will do a 'reach-around',with it's low pressure communicating beneath the diffuser and acting upon its surface to create downforce,with a drag penalty to the car.
*If suction is applied to a perforated diffuser,as Ferrari is currently doing,the air can be made to follow a steeper ramp angle and burst into the wake region.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
FORDF250HDXLT (07-28-2011)
Old 07-28-2011, 05:04 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 484

Suzi - '94 Swift GA
Team Metro
90 day: 48.94 mpg (US)

Prius II - '05 Prius Package 6
90 day: 46.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 62 Times in 36 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
It's a rearward facing surface, so it's not higher pressure just because the airflow is slowing down. Like the top surface of a fastback isn't seeing high pressure.
Exactly. The reason that performance cars want a diffuser is to increase their down-force. If it did the opposite and increased pressure (lifting the car off the ground) they would be avoided at all costs!
Diffusers can reduce the drag experienced by the vehicle. Drag is at it's lowest at ~2.66 (long, delta Cd 0.025) or 3.66 (short, delta Cd 0.02) degrees, and is still better drag-wise compared to having a 0 degree diffuser until at least after 11 degrees (short diffuser, delta Cd 0.007) or 6 degrees (long diffuser, delta Cd 0.013). In both cases, down-force (negative lift) is being increased all the way to the 6 and 11 degree numbers above, and in both cases they max out at delta Clr (coefficient of rear lift) at 0.26 (THIS IS HUGE!). I suppose I should quote Hucho on this one, figure 4.48 in his 4th edition.
What you can see is that a longer diffuser allows more downforce and lower drag than short diffusers.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wyatt For This Useful Post:
BeatUpRanger (07-29-2011)
Old 07-29-2011, 01:58 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Failed State Belgium
Posts: 2,959

Hδgar - '05 V50 1.6L Diesel
Diesel
90 day: 52.27 mpg (US)

Snert - '06 S40 1.6L Diesel
90 day: 58.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 283 Times in 228 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyatt View Post
Drag is at it's lowest at ~2.66 (long, delta Cd 0.025) or 3.66 (short, delta Cd 0.02) degrees, and is still better drag-wise compared to having a 0 degree diffuser until at least after 11 degrees (short diffuser, delta Cd 0.007) or 6 degrees (long diffuser, delta Cd 0.013).
Unless the vehicle has a squarish rear end (think squared off hatchbacks, station wagons, vans) where any diffusor angle wil increase drag !
__________________



Lifetime fuel consumption :
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 02:42 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Senoia
Posts: 17

BeatUpRanger - '95 Ranger XLT
Thanks: 7
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
I have soooo much to learn.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2011, 02:46 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 484

Suzi - '94 Swift GA
Team Metro
90 day: 48.94 mpg (US)

Prius II - '05 Prius Package 6
90 day: 46.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 62 Times in 36 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Unless the vehicle has a squarish rear end (think squared off hatchbacks, station wagons, vans) where any diffusor angle wil increase drag !
Do you have a reference for this? I have never seen anything (to my recollection) that counters the work shown in Hucho's book. I am not saying you are wrong (since aerodynamics is often counterintuitive even to the experienced), I just can't think of a reason why a diffuser would make things worse. I would actually think the bigger the back end, the more of a positive effect it would have. Thanks.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Tags
air dam

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com