Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2016, 09:49 AM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 6,719

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,872
Thanked 1,861 Times in 1,120 Posts
From his Facebook account:










__________________
Sincerely, Neil



http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-02-2016, 11:35 AM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 8,766
Thanks: 1,903
Thanked 2,869 Times in 2,242 Posts
That might make a good three passenger vehicle.

There are rumors/stories about putting two passengers in the back of a Messerscmitt KR-200. It made them really tippy.

Think of the plan taper with a centered rear seat, and the rear ingress/egress problem is cut in half.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 03:32 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 2,535
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1,548 Times in 1,093 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
From his Facebook account:
Nice find.

Earlier I did a Google image search using his user name but didn't find anything useful.

Certainly not what I was expecting.

I agree with Freebeard, (3-seater comment) but suggest one further step. Put the batteries up front for even better weight distribution.

I think I read a while back weight distribution should be in the range 70/30 to 66/34 front/back with the two wheels up front configuration (trike). Or in other words, each wheel bearing a near equal amount of weight.

The design as presented when fully loaded is too tail heavy.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2016, 05:51 PM   #24 (permalink)
Ecomuggler
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 5,228

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 40.43 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 33.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,131
Thanked 885 Times in 660 Posts
Oh. A canopy.

Do the headlights look like they are different heights?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2016, 07:09 PM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 8,362
Thanks: 10,240
Thanked 4,394 Times in 2,437 Posts
gently

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesheiman View Post
Ok, so it tapers in too quickly...would it actually be better off as a hatchback e.g. no taper at all? I know even some hatchbacks get about 0.3 CD.

And I think I see what you mean about the sides. As in they push air up, only to curve into an area where it's quickly pulled down a bit, thus causing a vacuum/turbulence area? How much CD would you guess that issue alone costs and what's a good way to fix it (simply keep sloping upward and very gently start curving downward to meet the very side/tail area)?
Yes,the initial inward curvature must be very gentle to protect the boundary layer.
This SMART Car is very good

For lower drag,just add length,while respecting the gentle slope

If you envisioned the car as an upright wing,you'd use the 3.92:1 section (between #4 and #5)

As a 3D flow body you'd opt for the minimum drag half body based on the 2.5:1 teardrop.
The curvatures of these shapes would be your guide as far as slopes go.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2017, 01:30 PM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 8,766
Thanks: 1,903
Thanked 2,869 Times in 2,242 Posts
What's with all the Photobucket placeholders?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2017, 01:45 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 6,719

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,872
Thanked 1,861 Times in 1,120 Posts
Photobucket now charges, so old links are broken.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil



http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2017, 06:19 PM   #28 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 8,766
Thanks: 1,903
Thanked 2,869 Times in 2,242 Posts
I didn't realize they are old re-posts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
From his Facebook account:



....

These don't even display placeholders in my web browser, Palemoon with Noscript. I like that part.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2017, 01:28 PM   #29 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 8,362
Thanks: 10,240
Thanked 4,394 Times in 2,437 Posts
design

Without either a full set of 5-view scale drawings,or telephoto pictures from a great distance I'm useless to you.
There is a way to estimate the total drag of a structure by analyzing each constituent component,allowing for interference at all intersections which is offered by Hoerner,in his book,Aerodynamic Drag.
We've got to have scale images to work with though.
Each component can be optimized based upon extant,published, empirical test results.
Front,Rear,Top,Side,and Bottom views are mandatory.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com