Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now

Now available from EcoModder: ScanGauge II fuel economy gauge.  Click for details.  

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2011, 11:46 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: london, on
Posts: 212

The Antichrist - '95 Discovery Plain Jane
90 day: 12.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
You guys are doing it wrong

Instead of worrying about fuel economy and aerodynamic desinsg you guys should leave well enough alone. Instead work on a "tractor beam" like in star wars so you can beam onto the car ahead of you and let them pull you along. Kind of like drafting. Let him worry about his mpg while you just coast along behind with the engine off

If that idea is to futuristic at least have some telescopic electromagnets that you can attach to the car ahead of you and use high test fishing line to connect


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2011, 12:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Newb
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 376

Acura TSX - '06 TSX
90 day: 29.95 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 CBR600 F4i
90 day: 43.18 mpg (US)

Jeep - '02 Liberty Sport
90 day: 18.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
I have entertained the idea of an electromagnet attaching to a big rig for freeway travel. The driver would probably not even notice the extra load on flat ground. It's those pesky laws that I'm really worried about though.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2011, 12:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,652
Thanks: 31
Thanked 237 Times in 171 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
It's those pesky laws that I'm really worried about though.
True. Plus the fact that for a lot of us, it's not really our personal fuel consumption that's the fundamental issue, it's the effects of burning petroleum. Thus if I reduce my consumption X amount by causing someone else to increase their consumption by the same amount, I've achieved nothing.

PS: Though drafting a semi should also produce a small aerodynamic benefit for the semi...
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
Cd (12-28-2011), NeilBlanchard (12-31-2011), Piwoslaw (12-29-2011)
Old 12-28-2011, 04:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Newb
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 376

Acura TSX - '06 TSX
90 day: 29.95 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 CBR600 F4i
90 day: 43.18 mpg (US)

Jeep - '02 Liberty Sport
90 day: 18.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
For highway travel, it doesn't make sense that thousands of vehicles moving in the same direction and roughly the same speed should individually power themselves. It would be like having an engine attached to each boxcar of a train. Gasoline engines are incredibly inefficient when operating at such low sustained loads.

Attaching your vehicle to a truck and turning the motor off would save a lot of fuel, even when considering the loss of MPGs experienced by the truck.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2011, 05:09 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Old Tele man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,352

Vibe - '09 Vibe Base (2ZR-FE)
90 day: 32.19 mpg (US)

Goldie Locks - '011 Cruze LTZ
90 day: 29.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 330 Times in 249 Posts
...big problem with a "train" is that if/when somebody in the middle needs to turn-off for gasoline or potty break, everybody behind him are suddenly gonna be "coasting" much to their surprise!
__________________
2011 Chevrolet Cruze LTZ 1.4LT 6A
2009 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/SFI 4A
2004 Pontiac Vibe 1.8L/MFI 4A
2003 Ford Focus ZX5 2.0L/Zetec 4A

1971 Dodge Charger 318 3A
1970½ Plymouth AAR 'Cuda 340/6BBL 4M
1968 Dodge Charger 383 3A
1967 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 383 4M
1965 Plymouth Barracuda Formula S 273 4M
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2011, 05:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: williamsburg, virginia
Posts: 2,061

Vulcan - '05 Vulcan 500 LTD
90 day: 60.08 mpg (US)

Mag Pearl - '011 Fiesta SE Hatch
90 day: 45.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 108
Thanked 309 Times in 228 Posts
Vactrain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evacuated tube transportation technology.

A ride in a 0 atmosphere tube after being fired by a magnetic rail gun, slowly enough to keep you from disintegrating on your way to 5000 MPH.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2011, 05:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Newb
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 376

Acura TSX - '06 TSX
90 day: 29.95 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 CBR600 F4i
90 day: 43.18 mpg (US)

Jeep - '02 Liberty Sport
90 day: 18.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 63
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Vactrain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evacuated tube transportation technology.

A ride in a 0 atmosphere tube after being fired by a magnetic rail gun, slowly enough to keep you from disintegrating on your way to 5000 MPH.

regards
Mech
I've always thought it would be quite efficient to send satellites to space using an evacuated tube and rail gun. I just don't know what kind of heat shield would be needed for when the craft exits the tube, or if the sudden impact of hitting 1atm at ~20,000mi/hr would pulverize everything. Build this gun on top of a tall mountain near the equator and you can cut it down to 0.5atm and reduce the required velocity.
__________________



Last edited by redpoint5; 12-28-2011 at 06:04 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2011, 05:48 PM   #8 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 581

Princess - '92 MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
90 day: 33.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 113 Times in 79 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Why bother with a tractor beam when you can just make a transporter?
__________________



Remember, even if you win the rat race - you're still a rat.

2010: 454.92L for 5313.90km => 8.56L/100km (27.5MPG US) (5 months)
2011: 606.11L for 7754.04km => 7.82L/100km (30.1MPG US) (Full year)
2012: 170.10L for 2405.00km => 7.07L/100km (33.3MPG US) (In progress)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2011, 05:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
ooo ooo ooo ah ah ah
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 7,357

Blue - '93 Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 F150 XLT
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 636
Thanked 848 Times in 591 Posts
Oh, I don't know... maybe tear around less?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2011, 09:24 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 590

Ladogaboy - '011 Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.18 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '011 Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 57 Times in 46 Posts
Why bother going anywhere at all? You're already someplace.


(Support Ecomodder.com & get rid of these annoying ads!)      
 
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ladogaboy For This Useful Post:
wdb (12-30-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com