I chastised the sender of this junk when I got it a couple of days before this thread.
It falls squarely into the category of neo-con spam.
I'm sure you've all gotten an avalanche of this sort of **** over the years.
It's all the same. Attempt to mislead/deceive by presenting something along with fundamentally flawed "facts", along with fundamentally flawed "conclusions". These can be outright lies and fabrications and/or, a bit sneakier, lies of omission.
At any rate, I find it interesting that after all these years, I can't recall getting garbage of this nature from the "Lib" side.
Oh yes, you sure wouldn't think the simple physics of a car/truck crash is political; it shouldn't be. But there is always that agenda that goes along with neocon spam distortions; in this case, it is the anti-small car/plant your ass in a giant SUV agenda.
What does the originator of this hope to gain by saying it's a Smart car, when it ain't?
I've told many people over the years that when I get that junk from them, it stops with me.
Why propogate it?
What do you get out of spreading lies?
Don't you ever get tired of being proven wrong??? I always "snopes 'em" or otherwise blow that junk out of the water.
Man, if I was wrong as often as they are, I'd be quite unhappy. And ashamed.