View Single Post
Old 07-16-2011, 01:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
bwilson4web
Engineering first
 
bwilson4web's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 843

17 i3-REx - '14 BMW i3-REx
Last 3: 45.67 mpg (US)

Blue Bob's - '19 Tesla Std Rng Plus
Thanks: 94
Thanked 248 Times in 157 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodak View Post
What are some of the EPA estimates flaws that go unnoticed by most consumers? . . .

The estimates are a good guideline, but I just tend to think that there is more to it - even the EPA agrees that YMMV.
Actually you can see the problem in the EPA web site:
Fuel Economy

For example, here are some compact cars:
  • 49.0(16 vehicles) vs 41 EPA- 2010 Honda Insight (auto)
  • 45.4(25) vs 41 EPA (48 EPA pre-2008) - 2003 Prius (auto)
  • 42.0(10) vs 33 EPA - 2011 Cruze ECO (manual)
  • 38.1(11) vs 34 EPA - 2010 Jetta TDI (auto)
The EPA score is an estimate and not really reflective of the utility of the vehicle.

Bob Wilson
__________________
2019 Tesla Model 3 Std. Range Plus - 215 mi EV
2017 BMW i3-REx - 106 mi EV, 88 mi mid-grade
Retired engineer, Huntsville, AL
  Reply With Quote