Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hybrids
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-02-2021, 09:42 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waspswatter View Post
Where do you get the chip?
Range AFM Disabler, amazon has them or you can probably find them 2nd hand. Just be careful which version you get, some are for afm disable and some are for stop/start disable. Check their website

__________________




  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-03-2021, 08:08 PM   #12 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,624 Times in 1,449 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary View Post
Regen is better than friction braking, but not as efficient as coasting to a stop.
I usually compare regen to those auxiliary exhaust-brakes more often featured on heavy-duty trucks and buses. Relying on regen as an extra safety measure, or to improve control while driving downhill for instance, is quite similar to how the exhaust-brakes are meant to operate.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
Waspswatter (06-07-2023)
Old 06-04-2023, 07:00 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 30

Lone Ranger - '05 Ford Ranger FX4
Thanks: 16
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I’m back!

Purchased a (fixer upper) house shortly after my last post on this thread, but now I’m almost ready to continue my project!

The aero bed topper plan is fully underway with a design that opens in the center when needing to haul larger cargo. However, more reading on this site has raised more questions.

I now have the stock air dam. Would side skirts help? What about rear diffusers? All I’ve read so far seems to be about already mostly efficient cars with much lower ride heights. I can add material to lower the air dam, and what about splitters? Is trial and error the only way to know what will actually help on my vehicle?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2023, 11:43 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,619
Thanks: 7,758
Thanked 8,572 Times in 7,058 Posts
Quote:
However, more reading on this site has raised more questions.
Questions about the aero topper, or the rest?

Lower vehicles benefit from less frontal area of the tires, and less air subject to turbulence in the underbody plenum.

More air underneath isn't a problem if it doesn't interact with the underbody, i. e., with a bellypan. The stagnation point [height] determines how much air goes underneath. An aggressive splitter puts it right at the bottom. (But a splitter at the top of the hood would induce lift) Those solar racers that run across Australia Have a lot of clearance with airfoil pants around the wheels.

As for side skirts, Aerocivic had double wall skirts to channel air around both wheels. What with break-over angles, look to P. K. Knox's Aerodynamic Template, or the VW XL-1. [links on request]

Quote:
'm going to make an aero bed topper customized to the work I'll be doing out of the truck, but I'd like to hear suggestions and input about favorable designs!
[later]
The aero bed topper plan is fully underway with a design that opens in the center when needing to haul larger cargo.
Hinge line lateral or longitudinal?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
Waspswatter (06-07-2023)
Old 06-05-2023, 12:09 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,879
Thanks: 23,955
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
Silverado aero

When you get a chance, take a look at General Motor's 2013, Holden Commodore VT Ute.
It's kind of like the El Camino and Ford Ranchero of the past; passenger car-based 'trucks'.
The VT is Cd 0.309, the lowest drag of ANY 'truck'
Anything they did would be fair game for the Silverado, except the tonneau cover. Your aeroshell will have a drag advantage over the tonneau.
* You may be able to block off some of the radiator inlet.
* A full-sweep, wrap-around airdam, as low as the lowest part of the belly, excepting the differential's pumpkin, all the way to the front wheels dates to 1974.
* Rocker panel extensions to matching depth.
* Electric cooling fan if it doesn't already have it.
* Any belly pan you can stand. Begin at the front and work rearwards.
* There may be better side mirrors available since 2010.
* I've got rear skirts, and they've never been 'in the way.'( as low as the belly/ rocker panels )
* A rear diffuser typically requires a full belly pan ahead of it ( one race car website offered a countervailing viewpoint ).
* Low-porosity wheel covers which allow for brake cooling.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the aeroshell were to become a PITA as far as 'hauling' goes, a half-tonneau, plus cab-wing extension offers more bed access, and only about a 2% drag penalty, comparatively.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you and your's ever go in the truck on a longer road trip to 'grandmother's' on holiday, or such, a receiver-hitch mounted boat-tail extension can add another 4-mpg.
https://fastcars.com.au/products/hol...re-2013-vf-ute
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Waspswatter (06-07-2023)
Old 06-06-2023, 01:10 AM   #16 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,624 Times in 1,449 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waspswatter View Post
Would side skirts help?
Usually they help.


Quote:
What about rear diffusers?
I see them mostly on sporty cars, but it may eventually be also implemented to a truck, as long as other aero mods are also fitted. Otherwise it would most likely be ineffective.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
Waspswatter (06-07-2023)
Old 06-07-2023, 09:34 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 30

Lone Ranger - '05 Ford Ranger FX4
Thanks: 16
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post



Hinge line lateral or longitudinal?

Laterally, similar to Bondo's and JRMichler's designs.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Waspswatter For This Useful Post:
freebeard (06-07-2023)
Old 06-07-2023, 10:15 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,619
Thanks: 7,758
Thanked 8,572 Times in 7,058 Posts


I've always wondered (not being a truck owner) why if job boxes at the front of the bed butterfly open, why not an entire aerocap?

Of course, were I to have a truck the reach-over height wouldn't be much more than the tire height. My son has a Silverado, I can barely see over the bed.

A good starting point would be a spoiler/half tonneau like this



Maybe chamfered on the ends for tumblehome.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2023, 11:00 PM   #19 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,430

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,206
Thanked 4,387 Times in 3,361 Posts
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-08-2023)
Old 06-27-2023, 10:40 PM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 30

Lone Ranger - '05 Ford Ranger FX4
Thanks: 16
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
How’s this?

I was unable to upload the image with the template so I took some screenshots instead…

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2006.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	94.5 KB
ID:	33942   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2010.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	81.9 KB
ID:	33943  
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com