Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-07-2017, 08:25 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
Accelerating for good fuel consumption.

I am struggling with trying to get the best out of my little engine under acceleration. I seems that no matter what I do I find that the instantaneous figure drops down into the low 20's (or lower) as soon as I open the throttle.
I have tried monitoring the Throttle Position Sensor, but the values the ScanGauge show seem to jump all over the place. It varies between 12 and 85 but trying to keep it up near 85 without reaching 85 is almost impossible.
My question is, can I use the loop sensor? If I keep the system running in Closed Loop, with the throttle as wide open as I can to keep it in Closed Loop, is this the best acceleration for fuel economy?
I do not allow the revs to exceed 3000, trying to keep them around the 2500 mark. Should I rev a bit higher, so that when I change gear the revs drop to nearer the point of best Brake Specific Fuel Consumption, instead of below it?

__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-07-2017, 08:28 AM   #2 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Let her rip- harder acceleration means less acceleration.

The sooner you're up to cruising speed, the sooner you're out of the bad instantaneous mpg. Even if you can mitigate it somewhat, it doesn't beat cruising mpg. Get into the throttle more sou you can get out of it sooner.

Your short trip mpg will thank you long before you get where you're going.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2017, 09:04 AM   #3 (permalink)
CruzeMTgrind
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 139

BlueBawls - '14 Chevrolet Cruze Eco
90 day: 48.47 mpg (US)

Eddie - '02 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Charlie that doesn't work for my Cruze. I feel for NA cars that's a good fit but anything with a turbo seems your best bet is to accelerate just out of boost. I have tested my acceleration many times and my little turbo eats gas.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2017, 09:19 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
Let her rip- harder acceleration means less acceleration.

The sooner you're up to cruising speed, the sooner you're out of the bad instantaneous mpg. Even if you can mitigate it somewhat, it doesn't beat cruising mpg. Get into the throttle more sou you can get out of it sooner.

Your short trip mpg will thank you long before you get where you're going.
As you are an experience Hypermiler, driving the same make and model as myself, I will certainly give that a try. My Jazz is the base model, difference is it has the 1.2 litre i-DSi engine. But being naturally aspirated I will certainly try that.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	My Jazz, looking well after a winter's use 6-4-17.jpg
Views:	1289
Size:	73.1 KB
ID:	22320  
__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2017, 09:50 AM   #5 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JockoT View Post
If I keep the system running in Closed Loop, with the throttle as wide open as I can to keep it in Closed Loop, is this the best acceleration for fuel economy?
Yes.

Furthermore, you should try to obtain a torque/HP dyno graph of your car's engine. Barring that, try to find the RPM point where your engine torque starts to drop - that's where you want to upshift.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
elhigh (08-15-2017)
Old 08-07-2017, 10:19 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
I have the Power/Torque curve here.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Jazz Power Curve.jpg
Views:	1948
Size:	29.5 KB
ID:	22333  
__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2017, 11:14 AM   #7 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
So, looking at that graph, I'd probably try to keep my engine speed between 2500 and 4500 RPMs while accelerating.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2017, 12:10 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
I've never ever rev'd it past 4000, but I'll give it a try.
__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2017, 04:47 PM   #9 (permalink)
CruzeMTgrind
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 139

BlueBawls - '14 Chevrolet Cruze Eco
90 day: 48.47 mpg (US)

Eddie - '02 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JockoT View Post
I've never ever rev'd it past 4000, but I'll give it a try.
Lmfao punch it grandpa eco gotta get the carbon out of there at some point.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2017, 05:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
I am not against revving a car. Even my Volvo was red lined on a regular basis. Just the Jazz has a gearbox whine (model trait - input shaft bearing), and revving makes it sound like the cogs are coming through the floor to meet you. Not worth fixing though.

__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices



Last edited by JockoT; 08-16-2017 at 02:20 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com