Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-19-2017, 11:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 29
Thanks: 15
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Aerodynamics behind tires (to add a fairing or leave open?)





Was reading an article on A Brilliant View Into Aerodynamics - Speedhunters.

It struck me as odd and possibly contradictory that the images actually seem to recommend having an open area right behind the tire (virtually no fairing), as opposed to a fairing directly behind it gradually sloping inwards. Even though, obviously, those designs still push/keep air away from the front and sides of the tires.

Any ideas how/why this works or why, in comparison, having a fairing directly behind the wheels may prove better aerodynamically?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-19-2017, 12:11 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
I suppose it could depend on what you are trying to achieve. If you are trying to direct airflow for speed and stability then that may require different parameters that trying to achieve efficiency.
The additions to the roof of this UK Stock Car (I know, different definition here)



would do very little on your street car, regarding fuel consumption.
It is a case of "horses for courses".
__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2017, 12:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 29
Thanks: 15
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Sure, but that stock car roof/spoiler seems obviously poised to achieve downforce/stability at the expense of efficiency, just like any other kind of spoiler. Even the airflow image above of the open wheel well seems to show air from the wheel well being directed straight backward and not up to induce downforce, for example.

How would leaving the back of wheel wells open do that or be applied for any reason other than efficiency?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2017, 12:33 PM   #4 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
All that I do is suggest you look at the original Honda Insight, although they changed this for later years:
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	s-l1600.jpg
Views:	776
Size:	63.7 KB
ID:	22703  
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2017, 02:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
The opening article hits on one of the topics we have mulled over before.

Quote:
I guess you want to know more on the aerodynamics side though? For that, I would say that I learned the most about pitch sensitivity, which is the way the aero changes when the car brakes and accelerates. Every car suffers from that
The car on the track is constantly braking and acclerating, often in turns and at various inclines/declines. Much more aggresive than a car on the street or hwy.

What works great cruising at 70 mph to and from work isn't what the track demands and vice versa.

That said, I suspect with so many track variables and rule restrictions, they are bound and gagged from doing what we might do.

One can often tell when a true aerodynamic designer/engineer is employeed by a race team, the cars start looking girly.

I think many race cars suffer from a knicklehead viewpoint, avoiding the more artistic solutions avaliable. The ones brave enough to cast away preconceptions and fear make the disruptive game changers. Then they are copied or get banned by rules to level the playing field.

This is the history of racing.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2017, 05:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,561
Thanks: 7,736
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Quote:
I think many race cars suffer from a knicklehead viewpoint
It will always be knucklehead for me.




I'd like to see this treatment on a VW Beetle with the front axle pushed out 8 inches so the footwell comes to a point.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2017, 04:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesheiman View Post
Was reading an article on A Brilliant View Into Aerodynamics - Speedhunters.

It struck me as odd and possibly contradictory that the images actually seem to recommend having an open area right behind the tire (virtually no fairing), as opposed to a fairing directly behind it gradually sloping inwards. Even though, obviously, those designs still push/keep air away from the front and sides of the tires.

Any ideas how/why this works or why, in comparison, having a fairing directly behind the wheels may prove better aerodynamically?
Interesting article. Thanks for the link. In the examples above, these cars are designed for huge downforce and tire grip which is often contradictory to low drag aerodynamics for better mpg. We hypermilers tend to drive at lower speeds with skinny tires tucked inside the bodywork. To answer your question, this works for this race car designer because it helps generate downforce. Exposed wheels will not help with a low drag design. Look to solar racers and salt flats streamliners to see cars designed for low drag aerodynamics.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to COcyclist For This Useful Post:
Xist (09-20-2017)
Old 09-20-2017, 05:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,561
Thanks: 7,736
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
It lets the smoke out.

Edit:
Quote:
...salt flats streamliners...
Here's what Luigi Colani took to The Salt.



A radical example of spatted wheels. IIRC the shape was based on the Gerridae aka Water Strider.

Last edited by freebeard; 09-20-2017 at 05:39 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
COcyclist (09-21-2017)
Old 09-20-2017, 05:32 PM   #9 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
I believe they are trying to vent air pressure from under the car to create a low pressure area with a rear diffuser to suck the car down to the road.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.

Last edited by COcyclist; 09-20-2017 at 05:36 PM.. Reason: double post
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2017, 02:03 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JockoT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654

All That Jazz - '06 Honda Jazz i-DSI S
Team Honda
90 day: 48.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by COcyclist View Post
to suck the car down to the road.
I wouldn't imagine that would be an aid to fuel efficiency.

__________________
People Think They Are Thinking When They Are Merely Rearranging Their Prejudices


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com