Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2015, 03:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: North East USA
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Aluminium Wheels vs Areodynamic Hubcaps

Hi Guys,
Currently have 16" x 6.5" wheels and they're steel. I was thinking about buying aerodynamic moon caps that seem pretty popular here. There is probably also a significant benefit by getting aluminum wheels. Has anyone tested this which is the better option?

There will probably be a weight difference of about 50-100lbs. Which is always nice but I haven't seen any aluminum wheels that have hubcaps. Unless anyone has any ideas there are the choices I see.

Aluminum 16" wheels - Save weight

Aluminum 18" wheels - Lower the RPM of engine at highway speed
Save weight

Aerodynamic hubcaps - Est 5% based on other people guesses on this forum.


Any ideas?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-07-2015, 04:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Less weight will enhance in-city mileage slightly where mass dominates.

Wheel covers will enhance highway mileage where aero-drag dominates.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
BabyDiesel (11-07-2015), MkVer (11-08-2015), wdb (11-08-2015)
Old 11-07-2015, 05:52 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: North East USA
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Just wondering if anyone has run into this problem before. Seems like everyone goes with The covers. That is also the cheapest option.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2015, 06:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 126

Champagne - '13 Chevy Cruze 1LT
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
Less weight will enhance in-city mileage slightly where mass dominates.

Wheel covers will enhance highway mileage where aero-drag dominates.
As suggested depending on your route parameters. I have aluminum rims and they're just as easy to place wheel covers on as steel rims with covers.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2015, 08:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
Lighter wheels will only make a noticeable difference if you drive 30 feet, stop drive 30 feet, stop and do that all day. Like a mail truck.
If you drive at speed like a normal person, moon caps or aero OEM hub caps are the way to go. Plus they will only be a fraction of the price of a new set of aluminum wheels and a fraction of the price of a used set too.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.

Last edited by oil pan 4; 11-07-2015 at 08:11 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2015, 09:58 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hootis View Post
Currently have 16" x 6.5" wheels and they're steel.

Aluminum 16" wheels - Save weight

Aluminum 18" wheels - Lower the RPM of engine at highway speed
Save weight

Aerodynamic hubcaps - Est 5% based on other people guesses on this forum.
Unless you're talking about buying very expensive forged wheels, the assumption that alloy wheels will save weight is often faulty.

OEM alloy wheels are much thicker than steel (because of the fatigue characteristics of alluminium), and will often end up heavier.

I swapped my factory 16" alloys to OE 14" steelies and saved 1.5kg per corner.

It's not helped by the fact that while your steel wheels are 6.5" wide, you'll probably struggle to find much in the aftermarket that isn't at least 7-8" wide.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2015, 10:49 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
vskid3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 975

Civic DX (sold) - '97 Honda Civic DX
90 day: 34.15 mpg (US)

GTO (sold) - '04 Pontiac GTO
90 day: 22.62 mpg (US)

Green Brick (sold) - '06 Ford Escape Hybrid
90 day: 31.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 193
Thanked 312 Times in 221 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hootis View Post
Aluminum 18" wheels - Lower the RPM of engine at highway speed
Save weight
Wheel size doesn't dictate tire size, it only changes your options. You could stick with your existing wheels and get taller tires if you wanted.

Plenty of people cut circles out of coroplast and zip tie them to their wheels, so you're not really limited by the wheel design.

What kind of car do you have?
__________________


Camry Thread
E-Bike Thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2015, 12:48 AM   #8 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
Something that nobody has mentioned to take into consideration, Reduction of unsprung weight will reduce rolling resistance
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ConnClark For This Useful Post:
BabyDiesel (11-08-2015), RedDevil (11-12-2015)
Old 11-08-2015, 07:25 AM   #9 (permalink)
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 931

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 835
Thanked 490 Times in 309 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
Something that nobody has mentioned to take into consideration, Reduction of unsprung weight will reduce rolling resistance
This. Reduction in RR is good for mpg gains across the board, irregardless of driving.

I'll add my own $0.02. One of the mods I have done to my car is lighter wheels. My stock ZX2 steelies were heavy, I'd have to say upper teens since the 14x4 spare wheel by itself was 16-17 pounds. I replaced the stocks with Mazda MX-3 alloy wheels I got for cheap ($110 with low tread tires!) They weigh 12.5-13 pounds, and have been covered in coroplast covers for over a year. They have provided gains in FE, aero and RR, though all I have is anecdotal evidence and your trust of my word. I have a thread somewhere where I tested the MX3s against the spares in real world driving... let me try to dig it up.

I looked at getting lighter wheels like this - they would help constantly. They would give lower RR during acceleration, cruising and coasting. Every stop sign and traffic light I get caught at and have to accelerate from, the lighter wheels are requiring less fuel to get back up to speed. The only downside is cost. But there are deals out there such as my MX3 wheels for $27.50 a piece, and then selling the steelies for $65 for a grand total of $45

I say go for both if you can!

Tell us what you're driving and we can make better recommendations for you
__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2015, 09:17 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
There are a lot of options for efficient alloy wheels, depending of course on your vehicle.
Switching from summer alloy wheels to winter steel wheels I notice my car feeling sluggish in town, my winter tires are lrr snow tires so I don't see a mileage drop on the highway, just on town.

Look for wheels from a hybrid, not aftermarket egg beaterwheels.


Last edited by Ryland; 11-09-2015 at 08:06 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ryland For This Useful Post:
MobilOne (11-08-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com