Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2010, 09:41 PM   #41 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Well, it would work, the question is would you like it? Cuz it's the torque values we should be comparing, I think. I think it would work but you may find yourself using higher rpms through the gears to get going. Eh, maybe, maybe not.

I recall back in the day we discussed these cars; I like the Speedster kits and you like the 550s, but given the chance I'd be happy with either!

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-15-2010, 10:30 PM   #42 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
Frank -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Well, it would work, the question is would you like it? Cuz it's the torque values we should be comparing, I think. I think it would work but you may find yourself using higher rpms through the gears to get going. Eh, maybe, maybe not.

I recall back in the day we discussed these cars; I like the Speedster kits and you like the 550s, but given the chance I'd be happy with either!
Ok. You see, you know what you're talking about in terms of the engine. I wasn't thinking of that, I was simply thinking power to weight ratio. Come to think of it, I think you are describing a Honda Beat :
Quote:
64 PS (63 bhp) at 8100 rpm with a top speed of 135 km/h (84mph).
Except, instead of a 656 cc 3-banger, it's a 250 cc 1-banger, !


CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2010, 11:15 PM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The other very light car we can compare and contrast with the Edison2 and the VW 1L is the Toyota 1/X -- a four seater with a curb weight of 926 pounds. If carbon fiber was made from chicken feathers, it would not be expensive.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 02:18 AM   #44 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
One other thing I'll say is that the real production version should have real glass, for those that need to scrape frost off.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 03:25 AM   #45 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
I hear that hard coatings are getting better, but at that angle, I'd want glass anyway, for the clarity. Running a very similar shape and angle with plain polycarbonate, I often had problems with low sun angles or headlights, especially in rainy or mist-prone weather. Even when brand new, it was noticeably worse than glass. Perhaps a hard coating can also reduce reflectance, etc.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2010, 03:32 AM   #46 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
In my previous engineering capacity I looked at hardcoated polycarb windshields. Nicer appearance, nicer optics, nicer scratch resistance.... but quite a bit costlier and still, relatively easily scratched vs glass. Wouldn't want them on my car. But on bikes, sleds, open cockpit stuff especially that where one often looks over the top of the windshield anyway, plastic is OK.

P.S. I corrected an earlier post of mine where I was wrong about the rear axle assy. The pic I'd seen was only one axle out of two, not the whole thing. Yes this car has W I D E tracks.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 09:44 AM   #47 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don´t understand the hype about the electric-powered cars. Apart from the carbon-imprint of these vehicles, which is not smaller than that of fuel-powered cars, the costs (mainly of the batteries) will be prohibitive. The Boston Consulting Group recently publisihed a study which predicts that in 2020 only 0.5percent of all vehicles will be powered exclusively by electric power. Which proves that a car which uses as little fuel as possible is the only way to save our diminishing resources
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 06:56 PM   #48 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I see niches where they would excell- stop-n-go, urban, short distance. Wonderful! My electric bicycle has proven that concept to me.

But as the be-all, end-all, universal replacement for Everyman's vehicle? I don't think so. I don't even think hybrids are the answer to that.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 10:00 AM   #49 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Here's a pretty detailed video interview about the Edison2 Very Light Car:

Automotive X-Prize: Edison 2 - Engineering TV

The suspension is inside the front wheels, and on the rear, the strut tube pivots to provide the suspension travel. The wheels weigh 6.2 pounds each (aluminum, carbon fiber, and magnesium) and they hope to get them down to 6 pounds, at least. The engine is a 250cc motorcycle engine, with proprietary packaging, and the transmission is custom made. It burns ethanol, which the X-Prize rules let them burn 1.5 gallons as an equivalent to gasoline. They plan on using a 5 gallon fuel tank to get over the 200 miles range -- the 3 gallon tank size would not do this.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 10:17 AM   #50 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
Nice find, Neil.

Super secret lightweight A/C too (A/C required by AXP rules to keep interior temps below 95F). With a completely sealed passenger compartment! If a conventional compressor is too heavy, what's the plan?

The X-Prize probably doesn't explicitly prohibit a refillable dry ice compartment.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric car conversion: Project ForkenSwift MetroMPG Fossil Fuel Free 1041 07-28-2014 09:19 AM
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 55 08-20-2012 11:34 PM
Coasting experiment: engine on VS engine off on a fixed route = 12.9% gain MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 6 02-22-2008 08:38 AM
Automotive X Prize - would a modded Civic VX make it? Krieg EcoModding Central 31 01-02-2008 07:06 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com