Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-20-2021, 04:22 PM   #41 (permalink)
Always Too Busy
 
Flakbadger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 566

White Lightning - '17 Nissan Leaf SV
Team Leaf
90 day: 159.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 190 Times in 134 Posts
Know what really grinds my gears?

That people read a headline about getting rid of internal combustion engines and immediately jump to “Current battery technology isn’t up to the task.”

The thing is, that is correct. Current battery or other “green” technology, and manufacturing levels cannot currently take up the mantle of gasoline/other fossil fuel technology. Everyone knows that replacing fossil fuels entirely is going to be an incredibly complex, difficult, and expensive task.

But here’s the rub.

Just because something is difficult, doesn’t mean it’s not worth doing.

There’s also this argument that new technologies with gasoline-powered vehicles can somehow improve the situation, and that is true on the surface. My wife’s Honda Fit has a 1.5 liter, 100ish horsepower gasoline engine that gets 40+ miles per gallon, versus let’s say the Model T, which according to Wikipedia had a 2.9L 4cyl engine, 20HP, top speed of 45 mph and MPG of ~13-21. Turns out that 100 years of innovation can improve a product greatly.

Thing is, that car is still burning fossil fuel, which is
-Finite
-A source of atmospheric pollution
-The cause of several C A T A S T RO P H I C spills. See the Gulf of Mexico or the Exxon Valdez if you want just two examples.

I also acknowledge that current battery manufacturing in China is one of the worst current environmental catastrophes to take place in the modern world.

But these problems can be overcome, and gasoline will not E V E R be sustainable or infinite.

Finding alternatives is inevitable, and it is time to start finding them; and lots and lots of leading scientists, engineers and various experts will tell you that replacing fossil fuel will be incredibly expensive and resource-intensive.

Thing is, there isn’t an alternative.

__________________
Nissan Leaf driver? Join me in Team Leaf and feel smugly superior about our MPGe

Current Car: White Lightning

----------------------------------------------

Retired Car: Betty White
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-20-2021, 05:25 PM   #42 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
They could be switching to rotory.

If oil is a finite resource then the problem will eventually provide it's own solution.

Anything made in china is an environmental catastrophe, even when they recycle stuff they eff up the environment.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 06:21 PM   #43 (permalink)
Always Too Busy
 
Flakbadger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 566

White Lightning - '17 Nissan Leaf SV
Team Leaf
90 day: 159.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 190 Times in 134 Posts
OK but switching to rotary is still burning gasoline, and that's not the future. Gasoline is the past and it's far past time to make the switch to pretty much anything else.

We are rapidly approaching CO2 levels that make photosynthesis impossible for many plants; rice and potatoes soon will lose nutritional value from it. And the last time CO2 levels were around this high, we had dinosaurs walking in ANTARCTICA, where it had a similar climate to modern day Washington.
__________________
Nissan Leaf driver? Join me in Team Leaf and feel smugly superior about our MPGe

Current Car: White Lightning

----------------------------------------------

Retired Car: Betty White
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 07:24 PM   #44 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Pistons don't imply gasoline made from deep, hot abiotic oil. It can also be made from —oh I don't know— compost?

https://cdn.nanalyze.com/uploads/201...ar_Process.jpg

There were palm trees in Antarctica, none in Washington state. But there was forest in Greenland in the last million, maybe 100,000s of years: I've seen palms as far North as Bleugene, OR.

www.uvm.edu: UVM scientists stunned to discover plants beneath mile-deep Greenland ice
Long-lost ice core provides direct evidence that giant ice sheet melted off within the last million years and is highly vulnerable to a warming climate, PNAS study shows
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 07:50 PM   #45 (permalink)
High Altitude Hybrid
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 1,954

Avalon - '13 Toyota Avalon HV
90 day: 40.45 mpg (US)

Prius - '06 Toyota Prius
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 538 Times in 432 Posts
Apparently they can make synthetic gasoline from CO2 directly captured from our very own atmosphere. Not that it's cheap to produce, but maybe in some future, internal combustion engines will be a hardcore enthusiast's hobby that requires a very expensive, carbon neutral fuel.

Ya, the whole "it's not currently up to the task" sales pitch is basically the same as saying "innovation has no purpose." I'm not saying the future is definitely electric or that it's going to be synthetic gasoline. But if we don't try to look for better ways of doing things then there's no progress. Maybe the future is neither electric nor internal combustion. Maybe it'll be something else that hasn't even been thought of yet. Or something that's been right there under our noses the whole time.

Personally I think there's too much emphasis on what cars look like and the pride of owning a car, which is really just a tool to get from point A to point B, and not enough emphasis on trying to figure out what would be a beneficial to everything form of transportation or if our insaciable glut for highspeed transportation is even necessary at the scale it is now.

Maybe figure out first where people and goods need and want to be. Offer incentives to make those places as close as possible. Then figure out what would be the best form of transportation between those points, as well as those places not in the usual routine, that not only makes everyone happy but is good for the environment.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 12:51 AM   #46 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Quote:
Maybe it'll be something else that hasn't even been thought of yet. Or something that's been right there under our noses the whole time.
It's called, "Staying at home."
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 07:17 PM   #47 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,548
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,622 Times in 1,447 Posts
What bothers me the most are the attempts to set an EV-only policy as if it could work as a one-size-fits-all approach.


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Pistons don't imply gasoline made from deep, hot abiotic oil. It can also be made from —oh I don't know— compost?
Considering organic waste will always be around, it makes much more sense to manage it in a way that would lead to some economical benefits. I'm sure using it as a fuel source makes more sense than simply letting the organic matter rot away releasing raw methane and other compounds into the atmosphere, soil and groundwater. And while some sort of "biogasoline" may seem suitable to address the requirements of most folks who take ethanol with a grain of salt, I am still favorable to ethanol, biomethane and biodiesel.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2021, 09:51 AM   #48 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,043
Thanks: 462
Thanked 1,104 Times in 974 Posts
Raise the price of gasoline to the equivalent alternative biofuel in BTU then stand back and watch the panic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2021, 05:56 PM   #49 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
Many of the people who defend batteries as being a budding technology, seem to lack the same vision when looking at ways of dealing with CO2 positively as also a new and developing technology. They seem to jump right into the 'ban it is our only option' camp. Sometimes it just seems there are other motives behind things besides the claimed goal. If lower CO2 levels was the only goal then a complete ban on fossil fuel would not be the best solution.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2021, 10:39 PM   #50 (permalink)
High Altitude Hybrid
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 1,954

Avalon - '13 Toyota Avalon HV
90 day: 40.45 mpg (US)

Prius - '06 Toyota Prius
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 538 Times in 432 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
Many of the people who defend batteries as being a budding technology, seem to lack the same vision when looking at ways of dealing with CO2 positively as also a new and developing technology. They seem to jump right into the 'ban it is our only option' camp. Sometimes it just seems there are other motives behind things besides the claimed goal. If lower CO2 levels was the only goal then a complete ban on fossil fuel would not be the best solution.
We all know the real reason companies say things. They say it to make money. Not that they can't try to do good things for the environment too. But they do it and say it so people will but their products.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Isaac Zachary For This Useful Post:
Hersbird (03-23-2021)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com