Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-22-2022, 11:48 PM   #11 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,438

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,387 Times in 3,361 Posts
I do t know the specifics about your vehicle, but you’ve got a lot more room for improvement than someone driving a Prius. A 10% improvement in your van is going to save a lot more money than a 10% improvement on a Prius.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-23-2022, 12:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 65

Spark - '14 Chevrolet Spark Ls
90 day: 38.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
I do t know the specifics about your vehicle, but you’ve got a lot more room for improvement than someone driving a Prius. A 10% improvement in your van is going to save a lot more money than a 10% improvement on a Prius.
I'm still new to this world, so I'm only going of info I've obtained from the Econoline forums I've been part of.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tmugz88 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-30-2022)
Old 06-23-2022, 01:03 AM   #13 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tmugz88 View Post
We own a 2007 E350 Superduty , 12 passenger auto 2wd with the 5.4L with OD.
Had this engine been at least as popular as the SBC among off-roaders, sure there would be more builds oriented toward low-end torque that you could replicate and match with a higher differential ratio
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2022, 10:41 AM   #14 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,111 Times in 980 Posts
Just checking: it's a passenger van, not some weird excursion variety. So aero is your devil. Brick wall in the front, huge vortices behind you, the side mirrors are probably worth a 2mpg penalty just by themselves.

80 psi tires means 6ply or better, probably another 1or 2 because they are heavy and not designed for fuel efficiency or low rolling resistance.

You're mantra should be clean up the flows around and below the vehicle. The people here know their stuff, welcome.

And no reason you can't improve the mpg. Wont be 30, but it will be better than you get now.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2022, 10:59 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,649
Thanks: 7,764
Thanked 8,575 Times in 7,061 Posts
Retractable boat tail, side skirts, and a half-circular front bumper (no pic from the front)

I made this for another thread. Half-rounds chamfer the stagnation point like the Cybertruck and bellmouth the radiator, mirrors moved away from the A-pillars, side skirts, Cruiser skirts and a boxed cavity.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2022, 03:37 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 65

Spark - '14 Chevrolet Spark Ls
90 day: 38.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko View Post
Just checking: it's a passenger van, not some weird excursion variety. So aero is your devil. Brick wall in the front, huge vortices behind you, the side mirrors are probably worth a 2mpg penalty just by themselves.

80 psi tires means 6ply or better, probably another 1or 2 because they are heavy and not designed for fuel efficiency or low rolling resistance.

You're mantra should be clean up the flows around and below the vehicle. The people here know their stuff, welcome.

And no reason you can't improve the mpg. Wont be 30, but it will be better than you get now.
Click image for larger version

Name:	20220623_143126.jpg
Views:	11
Size:	98.3 KB
ID:	32443

Here's a side shot of our 07 Econoline.

I may start carrying the cargo carrier we have on the rear hitch like was suggested . Just need to install it in between work and packing for our move.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tmugz88 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-30-2022), freebeard (06-23-2022)
Old 06-23-2022, 03:54 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,649
Thanks: 7,764
Thanked 8,575 Times in 7,061 Posts
Be aware that the hitch box shown by redpoint5 does what's called 'wake filling'. Some benefit, but not as much as if there is a smooth transition off the vehicle body.

Would you be more inclined toward skirts or lowering?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2022, 11:08 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 65

Spark - '14 Chevrolet Spark Ls
90 day: 38.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Be aware that the hitch box shown by redpoint5 does what's called 'wake filling'. Some benefit, but not as much as if there is a smooth transition off the vehicle body.

Would you be more inclined toward skirts or lowering?
It really would come down to usability for our household, and living in Northern Wisconsin I wouldn't know how either would handle the changes in weather and seasons .
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tmugz88 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-30-2022), freebeard (06-24-2022)
Old 06-23-2022, 11:32 PM   #19 (permalink)
Diesel driver
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Australia
Posts: 21
Thanks: 12
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'm thinking conveyor belt style front dam, underbody lining to smooth flow, side skirts and some flow separation at the back.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2022, 01:58 AM   #20 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,562
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,625 Times in 1,450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko View Post
80 psi tires means 6ply or better, probably another 1or 2 because they are heavy and not designed for fuel efficiency or low rolling resistance.
I don't see any full-size truck, van or SUV with anything below 8PR so often. And even some 8PR 185R14 tires for VW Kombis are already quite heavy...

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com