Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-09-2014, 02:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
New Chevy Sonic owner here

I've always liked econocars, and now I have one that's quiet, fun to drive and has some serious overhead on the power train for modification as well as more than the usual amount of latitude for good versus bad driving -- a Chevy Sonic 1.4 turbo. Have already been trying out driving it more like a hybrid (i.e. keeping the turbo use minimized except when I'm using the turbo as a hybrid would use e-assist) and this enables it to comfortably beat the EPA rating on the highway. Next step, testing out 93 octane fuel, a lower resistance air filter and ditching the stock tires for some LRR ones. Possible future steps, a performance tune and a different air intake. I think there is a lot of scope on this car for leaving the EPA figures far behind even at posted speed limits.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-09-2014, 03:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Welcome to the site.

What kind of mileage are you getting with it now?
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 03:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Growin a stash
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 800
Thanks: 411
Thanked 303 Times in 227 Posts
Congrats on the new car! My fiance has a Sonic 1.8L and I have its big brother- the Cruze 1.8L. I'm jealous though, wish I had the turbo like you. They're really well-built cars. As you probably know, they're the only compacts built in the USA.

We're both beating the EPA ratings pretty easily. I would recommend a grill block before a tune. It's basically free and it's guaranteed better mileage on the highway. GM says the lower grill block is good for +1 hwy mpg on the Cruze.

Here's a thread about that:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ead-29124.html

Just take it off before you drive through Death Valley in the summer
__________________


2024 Chevy Bolt

Previous:
2015 Nissan Leaf S, 164 mpge
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 03:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Welcome! Be careful about "low restriction" air filters. They almost always let more dirt into your engine
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 04:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907 View Post
Welcome! Be careful about "low restriction" air filters. They almost always let more dirt into your engine
For example the K&N oiled ones?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 04:32 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Welcome to the site.

What kind of mileage are you getting with it now?
Highway miles, about the best controlled test I've done of it came in at around 41 MPG calculated over a 420 mile stretch, I would guess a 71mph average with the AC on, in other words, 4mpg over the EPA. The main strategy is to lay off the turbo by turning cruise off in the hillier segments of the drive, allowing the car to slow uphill and then regain speed down. Of course that requires a bit of vigilance on the downhill stretches as you can gain speed too fast for other motorists/cops etc. Next time I'll try knocking a few mph off that average, but with the way certain people drive in the summer it's a bit scary to go slow.

City driving, well, we're talking Chicago, so it's a lost cause trying to get a measurement under controlled test conditions. But at least not a lost cause trying to drive better. I have estimated city driving based on short term measurements from the dashboard computer anywhere from the high teens to above 40. It's completely unpredictable; all you can do is time the lights, drive with moderation, leave as much space in front as you dare (not easy in Chicago where everyone cuts in) and hope for the best. What is noteworthy is I had a Prizm 5MT for 12 years -- three hundred pounds less weight, a marginally lower drag coefficient and a manual transmission which I was continually careful to short-shift and never wore out the clutch on -- and this heavy little automatic with a turbo is at least equalling the Prizm's fuel mileage already at only 2000 miles. But I get the sense it is capable of much more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 10:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
Changing your airfilter most likely won't change you mpg, the throttle plate unless at full throttle controls the amount of air flow not the filter, remove the filter the throttle plate closes a tiny bit more. Same air flow = same amount of fuel = same mpg.

There are some guys doing tunes and running E85 putting down some good numbers. Increased MPG isn't the numbers there are going after though. Instead of trying 93 ocatane, I'd look for some E30 from a blender pump or mix your own.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2014, 11:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebreeze View Post
For example the K&N oiled ones?
Yes. If you look at race teams, they either use no filter because they rebuild the engine after every run. Or they use paper filters.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 12:20 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
Changing to one of those reusable filters means you dont have to replace your air filter or even clean it that frequently. For mpg its unnoticable. For power, maybe but you arent running full boost or having a lack of power?

Some of the kn kits contain parts that replace oem parts that changes the air flow and that results in more power and some times mpg.

I use kn cause I dont want to pay 30 bucks every 5 thousand miles for a new air filter. and at one time I use to drive 300 miles a day, so that would add up fast.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 07:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
backpacker3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 384

Homer - '02 Pontiac Sunfire SE
Team Pontiac
90 day: 30.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 53 Times in 50 Posts
I'm interested in the results of your tune when you get it. You have a lot of options there from optimizing the engine for an octane level of gas and a ton more. Sounds interesting.

__________________
Aiming for 50 MPG from an automatic.
See how I'm doing here, My Build Thread

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com