2008 Honda Fit -- Opinions
Hello everyone,
My first post here. I've enjoyed reading this forum, but I haven't seen too many opinions on the Honda Fit. I'm thinking of buying one. I've never bought a new car before, and it feels a bit weird, but here are my main reasons.
The Honda Fit seems like a logical choice. From what I've read, people seem to get the 28/34 mpg up considerably higher, even without serious hypermiling. Does anyone here have any experience? Any idea what kind of mileage can I expect with mild hypermiling? Any thoughts on my choice? Thank in advance, Siaharok |
Welcome to the site Siaharok. The Fit is a great car. I've heard of more than a few owners getting 50+ and some are almost getting 55. Of course this is a bit more than mild hypermiling. Doing the mild stuff you would probably be in the low 40s I would think.
|
Welcome to ecomodder! I like the car, well made, has been around for many many years (not in the US).
|
all depends what you want, it is definitely more plush than the Yaris but heavier and the power to weigh ratio compared to the Yaris hurts it on FE and speed.
The wagon part is nice; a friend of mine has one. I have both the sedan and hatch Yaris. The hatch is pretty small... based on about the same commute(we live close and work together) he gets low 30s in the Fit and I get low 40s. The Fit also has side impact airbags and antilock brakes standard, the Yaris does not. I rented the Versa for about 3 weeks, lots more power but mileage sucked I am an environmentally minded revolutionary...I went for FE and Toyota reliability, the Yaris is cheaper too |
Siaharok -
Welcome to EM! The only real shortcoming of the Fit is that I think we expected even better MPG from the Honda than we got. Then again, we didn't get all the engine options that the Fit (aka the Honda Jazz) has in other countries. If it helps your business to drive a mini-wagon with an American nameplate, the Pontiac Vibe is a good choice. It's a Toyota Matrix under the skin, which means it's a Toyota Corolla drivetrain. Here is a review of it by RH77 : 2008 Pontiac Vibe (Record Results) http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ults-1212.html If you pick the Fit then I think you will be fine. It's the Swiss-Army-Knife of mini-wagons. Here are some cubic feet capacity comparisons between the Fit and the Vibe : Honda Fit Specifications http://automobiles.honda.com/fit/specifications.aspx Quote:
http://www.automobilemag.com/am/2009...fications.html Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Hi,
The Vibe is a re-badged Toyota Matrix -- isn't it a bit heavier and have a bigger displacement engine than the Fit? |
Love my Fit! Have an automatic that has gotten up to 43 mpg and averages 40. Two other people have them at my place of employment, both of them are sticks. One owner who drives with a bit of a lead foot gets 36-37 mpg. The other owner who drives more conservatively is getting 43-45 mpg.
|
Quote:
|
NeilBlanchard -
Quote:
2007 Honda Fit 1.5 liter 4 cylinder http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calcu...umn=1&id=22861 Quote:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calcu...umn=1&id=23628 Quote:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calcu...umn=1&id=23622 Quote:
The 2008 Vibe is actually 1 MPG less highway, so maybe the combined MPG is closer to 28, :( . CarloSW2 |
Hi,
I wish that Honda would sell the 1.3 liter 2009 Fit in the USA. It's 98HP vs 118HP for the 1.5 liter. Judging from the 103HP in my xA, 98HP is plenty powerful. |
"Love my Fit! Have an automatic that has gotten up to 43 mpg and averages 40. Two other people have them at my place of employment, both of them are sticks. One owner who drives with a bit of a lead foot gets 36-37 mpg. The other owner who drives more conservatively is getting 43-45 mpg."
Yes, I'm another that thinks this thing should turn-in even better numbers. My 2006 Civic 4-door manual trans has averaged about 35.2 mpg its whole life and that includes initial break-in, winters, frequent short trips within a city and just mild hypermiling for a quarter of its life. My last tankful was 41.4mpg in mixed driving. :) |
Thanks for all the replies. :)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Honda Fit RULES!!
If you haven't already bought a Fit, here is some food for thought.
1. MPG - EPA are low!, They must drive the hell out of it. I have driven this car(2008 manuel) hard and have gotten no worse than 34mpg, but with normal driving for me, I get 38-40 mpg, and when i have really babied it up to 45 mpg. Its for real, and guess what there will be a 2009 honda fit hybrid!! I believe your best bet is a manuel, if you want to get the best MPG, and you will save $800 dollars with the manuel transmission 2. Interior, nothing to fancy, but what would you expect for less than 17K for the Fit Sport. layout is good, magic seats are magic as the gas tank is under the passenger front seat to allow the back seat to very low, giving you an enormous amount of space. all my coworkers are amazed at the space when rear seats are down. 3. Reviews of this car have been stellar, Rated #1 best subcompact. 4. Extremely safe with side curtain airbags, I don't believe any other car in this price range has the feature standard. crash testing was very good 5. Honda - very good track record with their cars 6. Appeal - looks. People seem to either love it or hate it. I personally am not caught in the "wow look at my BIG expensive car" attitude that many people have. Many of these people are in debt up to their ears because of this attitude, and i have yet to see a cemetary that will allow someone to be buried in their SUV. sorry i will get off my soapbox(Anti-SUV)! I would admit that the Sport model clearly looks much better than the base and is only marginally more expensive. As well there are a few options that make it a bit more sporty as well, - sport grill, muffuler tip, ect. I spent probably 1 year researching many different cars in this class, the Fit was the clear winner! good luck Peter:):D |
I met up with a guy in Cleveland driving a Honda Fit. He noticed my "57MPG" stickers on my Metro and started asking questions. He was claiming no problems with his car and could easily get 40 MPG without trying.
|
Yes, I did buy it. And I hate it. What a terrible little car!
Joking. :) I love it, of course. This turned out to be one of those perfect purchases for me. I average about 38mpg with the A/C on and minimal hypermiling. The EPA estimates are a joke, really. The magic seats are indeed magic, and I managed to fit a full-sized, boxed fridge in the back with the hatch only slightly open (tied down, of course). The guy at Home Depot looked at my car after it was in and said, "I think we just did the commercial for the Fit." |
I'm glad you bought the Fit. I bought mine on July 15th 08 and am loving it. The worst mileage I've seen so far is 35.6. My range is has been pretty narrow (only ~2000miles right now) from 35.6-38.9 (Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com). I'm curious to see how it gets around this winter the guy at the dealer said they were one of the easier cars to get around when moving them last winter, he said the accords you could plan on pushing (of course he is a sales guy).
|
Quote:
|
We have a 2004 CVT auto Honda Jazz, the tardis description is bang on and as stated the magic seats are great, the CVT box is incredible.
Flip side, the steering is wooden/dead, wind noise at speed is high and it has had more faults than any other car that I have ever bought, is is a great practical car in use though. If you love throwing the car around it will wear the front tyres very unevenly but only if you drive like a loony. :) |
the fit only gets 31 mpg? :eek: I'm getting almost that in my truck and it isn't new at all. But then again if i had the fit i could get way better than 31.
|
Quick update. I did buy the Fit, and I love it. With my Scangauge, I'm getting 51pmg easily. :)
|
the fit in winter
got my 07 fit in late 06 (but just got my scanguage tonight!).
On the subject of winter driving--last year here in Iowa City we got something like 6 feet of snow over the course of a couple months, with ice storms in between. The fit handled far, far better than I expected--maybe cause of the pricey sport tires. My old car was a beautiful 84 Honda Civic Dx hatch (RIP), and although it easily got 55 mpg highway, it also could skid and lock up in an inch of snow at 5 mph. Fit--good in snow, good in ice. Not so great with big crosswind with snow and ice. PS: the auto is actually geared for better efficiency than the manual (and you can always use the paddle shifters on the sport if you want 5th when cresting that hill at 40). Throttle cutoff when coasting, pop it in neutral to increase roll, driving's fun again |
Quote:
|
Jazz good
I have bought a 2004 Jazz / Fit, and love it.
The way the back seats fold is brilliant because the fuel tank is under the front seats. Using driving techniques and 40psi tyres we get 4.5 l/100km ( 52 MPG ), whether on the highway at up to 110 km or around town in 50km zones. This is far better than our 2002 Toyota Echo / Yaris which could not achieve these levels in the city and also used around 6.5 on the highway. |
Ah, but what engine do you have, alexibu?
In North America, the only available engine is the 1.5L and a transmission that's geared badly for efficient highway motoring. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hello All:
My wife and I just got a 2009 Honda Sport Fit with 5 spd. using the C4C rebate. Her first two tankfuls were 43.3 MPG (calculated) on rural roads and a little town driving; she is a careful, slow driver, but does no hypermiling. The little MPG meter was a little optimistic @ 49.5 MPG. I have not had a chance to check the odometer so there may be some additional correction later. Tires were pumped up to 38 psi for most of the driving. The Fit is a great choice for a hatchback or a mini-minivan, offering excellent handling, comfortable seats, lots of interior space and airbags everywhere. Acceleration is almost as good as my '95 Acura Integra (basically a Honda Civic B-18B1 engine, 5 spd and Civic chassis) which gets about 35.0 MPG in similar, but more spirited driving. If the Fit lasts as long as my Acura (300,000+ miles with the worst repair being a clutch replacement), I'll be delighted! In my opinion, Honda engineering and reliability is superb, especially at the price. And I have had 50 years of driving BMWs, Jags, MGs, Fords, Chevys, Datsuns, Toyotas, Dodges, VWs, Porsches, Plymouths, Mitsubushis, Triumphs, Austin-Healeys and even a Berkley (does anyone remember those?). The Honda products are simply the best of the lot and consistently get excellent FE in normal driving. |
Congrats on the car!! That said....
My opinion: the Fit is hideous! For that reason alone I could never own one, unless I somehow came into a sweet deal. That pettiness aside I think it's a great compact mechanically and ergonomically that has the Honda navigation as an option, which is for sure one of the best navi systems out there, though it's a little frustrating to operate at first (I've had two cars with it in it). For now I'm happy with having an older Civic as a every-day-car and a nice new truck for when I need it. Seems like the Fit is a great car for you as a primary car though, so again: congrats. |
greetings, I bought it for the fold flat rear seats, wish the fronts also folded flat,
|
I purchased a 2011 Fit 2 weeks ago. I was looking for a small hatch that could hold my mt. bike and gear. I was really surprised at the amount of room in the back when the seats are folded down. I can get my bike in there with both wheels attached. I got the Sport and I dig the looks. So far I'm getting around 32 mpg combined. It has 340 miles on it now. How long does it typically take to break them in and see an improvement in mileage?
|
Might help to compare your mileage to other Fit owners in the garage...
EcoModder Fleet list - EcoModder.com |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com