Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2012, 10:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 201
Thanks: 45
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Big pickup mpg ability - stock and modded

Does anyone have any rules of thumb for the approximate aerodynamics of full size pickups, primarily chevy/ford/GM, but not only including the latest/newest ones? I'm curious how much things have improved from say the 80's to today and whether any of them stand out or if they are all about the same. What little i've seen suggests the aerodynamics of a brick for dodges, i've seen Ford windtunnel tests designed for efficient tailgate up towing - and wondered whether the truck itself is a bit swoopier because it actually is better aero... or if that's just styling.

I'm sure there's lots of other posts and I will search - this is strictly brief info/rules of thumb/suggestions for further research. Like someone following trucks better than me if they could share any useful info they know.

I'm specifically wondering if there's any full sizes that can get 30mpg or higher at 70mph normal road speeds, whether through teardrop bed covers or whatever, but without excessive focus on extremely numerically low gearing. (future project to research will be a tow vehicle for 5 tons and up loads either 5th wheel or preferably gooseneck, main goal being to boost mileage while unladen or with empty trailers, and while moving low dense heavy material on flatbeds) As an interesting story of point I once met a guy (with previous owner claiming the same) who had a 44mpg Suburban... it was some modified isuzu diesel in it and still had enough power to pull a horse trailer. He probably drove it real slow but I still find that mindblowing if it's even possible despite hearing good things about cummins/isuzu 4cyls approaching 30mpg without any aeromodding at all.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stillsearching For This Useful Post:
thomason2wheels (08-25-2012)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-25-2012, 10:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
wrx4me...
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: goode, va
Posts: 143

no worries - '91 Subaru legacy L
90 day: 31.45 mpg (US)

weevee - '08 suzuki vstrom dl650
90 day: 61.22 mpg (US)

wrx - '09 Subaru wrx sedan
90 day: 29.8 mpg (US)

Big Bright Green Pleasure Machine - '09 kawasaki ninja 250 se

Connie - '09 kawasaki concours
Thanks: 42
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Good questions sir. I too share your general curiosity about trucks and SUVs. There are so **** many of them on the road. I'd love to see some real numbers to see what models have the best aero designs right out of the box. Seems like it would be smart to buy something that starts out with an advantage.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 01:41 AM   #3 (permalink)
live, breath, Isuzu-Ds
 
trooper Tdiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: oregon
Posts: 231

puddle jumper - '93 Suzuki sidekick base model

energizer bunny - '86 isuzu trooper base model

Clifford the big red dog - '84 GM S-10 durango
Thanks: 1
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
most likly engine is the 3.9L isuzu I-4
about the only engine used in Isuzu cab overs in the 80s early 90s

the 2.8 and 3.1L where never sold state side rigged for road use...there more of a car engine with a 4,200rpm top end when in road config.

its more or less size wise the same as a cummens 4BT engine,
same size, same 750LBs and same 2,800ish rpm limit..

its the one that's in the dodge trucks with two less pistons.


difference being the Isuzu was sold in many different flavors over the years,
DI and IDI injected with and with out turbo.

the early ones have HP numbers on par with my Isuzu SUV 80hp just its a 3.9L not a 2.2L so way more torque.

where the 4BT are all DI injected and turbo-ed as far as i know, for the ones made for road use.....



id say 30 is quite possable, but 44 hmmm.....need real lonnnnnnnnnnnnng legs as far as gearing.
problem is a 2.73-3.08 non full floating diff don't work real well for big loads......
i know more then one person that as blown light diffs up moving big loads in half tons...
__________________
1 86 T\D trooper with rare GEN 3 rods TRANS FIXED NOW DD
1 86 4WD 5sp pup is 2.3L gas, but plan on 2.2L diesel repower
1 91 trop, long term plan is a group buy of imported Isuzu 4JB1-T 2.8L I-4 engines, hoping to get price down to 2K not 3K plus
1993 sidekick my MPG toy, epa rating 26.
i get 29/31 with stock drive train.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to trooper Tdiesel For This Useful Post:
slowmover (08-26-2012)
Old 08-26-2012, 03:22 AM   #4 (permalink)
wrx4me...
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: goode, va
Posts: 143

no worries - '91 Subaru legacy L
90 day: 31.45 mpg (US)

weevee - '08 suzuki vstrom dl650
90 day: 61.22 mpg (US)

wrx - '09 Subaru wrx sedan
90 day: 29.8 mpg (US)

Big Bright Green Pleasure Machine - '09 kawasaki ninja 250 se

Connie - '09 kawasaki concours
Thanks: 42
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Interesting stuff guys...most of my towing needs are served by my subaru wagon. 5x8 garden trailer for moving the bike or lawnmower. So far so good :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 10:40 AM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
I'm specifically wondering if there's any full sizes that can get 30mpg or higher at 70mph normal road speeds . . . .

This contains your first of several mistaken assumptions (stated and implied).

.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 06:41 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Yeah, if you call 70 mph "normal road speeds" and you're looking for 30+ mpg out of a full size pickup that's akin to asking for a diet pill that's going to make you lose weight while eating lots of bacon and donuts.
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2012, 07:31 PM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Does anyone have any rules of thumb for the approximate aerodynamics of full size pickups, primarily chevy/ford/GM, but not only including the latest/newest ones? I'm curious how much things have improved from say the 80's to today and whether any of them stand out or if they are all about the same.
FWIW I figure most late model full-size pickups have about 39 square feet of frontal area and Cds of .45. My guess is there wasn't a whole lotta change in aero between the '70s through, oh, the mid '90s, when there may have been wee lil incremental improvements in Cd (airdams, thick tailgate edges, etc.) which were probably more than offset by bigger frontal areas from bigger cabs, running gear, and tires.

However there was a recent EM post about the new Ram which has aero tricks that bring Cd down to .36, which sounds like one helluvan accomplishment.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
slowmover (08-27-2012)
Old 08-26-2012, 11:23 PM   #8 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
Yeah I want to be able to drive faster than 45mph pulling a trailer.
A turboed isuzu 4 cylinder only makes like 130-150hp.
Thats close to what my N/A 6.5L diesel made.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com