![]() |
2013 DOE Class-8 semi-trailer research
Ran across this, from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
On page-11 they're still using the 10% delta drag / 5% delta mpg relationship. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/fi...ari_2013_o.pdf |
2013 is going on two decades but one takes what one can get.
Page 13 gives a relation between the angle measurement and curvature measurement. :thumbup: Quote:
|
curves, angles,..............
On page-12, they show a 48"- 3-sided tail, and a 32" - 4-sided tail.
And Cds are for the combination gap seal, skirts and tail, together. On page-13, no dimensions are given for any of the 4-types, and there isn't enough information provided to 'reconstruct' what they've actually done, except for the radii, from which to reverse-engineer. Nothing's straight forward. Bummer. The Ahmed and modified Ahmed bodies provide all the information we need. So to, for Rolf Buchheim et al.'s series of prismatic bodies, and curved-roof bodies. Buchheim's prismatic optimum angles were all a function of the length of the sloped rear panel, as a fraction of the greenhouse length. Finally, the 4-sided tail isn't shown at all, and we have to guess if the 'floor' is level, or angled up like the top and sides. |
serrations on trailing edges
If they were serrated, there'd be a small difference in pressure at the 'tips', compared to the 'short' pie-piece voids.
Technically, that's a setup for vorticity and noise at the staggered separation line, and it would rob some pressure recovery overall. According to NASA Photo: E-38096, from 1981, we'd likely see zero longitudinal vorticity as can be seen ( tufts ) on Project Shoebox. By the way, NASA'a boat-tail appears to be cribbed from Paul Jaray & Associates' 1921, softened and boat-tailed square-cylinder, tested by Wolgang Klemperer, at the Zeppelin Werkes wind tunnel. And it's delta-Cd varies almost perfectly as described in SAE Paper # 2020-01-0673, by Jeff Howell et al.. ( Cd 0.2429-predicted, vs Cd 0.242 as measured by NASA ). |
Quote:
https://ecomodder.com/forum/member-f...29-0-large.jpg |
turbo jet/fan
Quote:
To reduce drag on the truck, one wants to use every millimeter of length at the tail for pressure recovery and uniform velocity/pressure when the streams meet, minimizing shear. |
some numbers
There was just enough information to reverse-engineer some values for the semi-trailer:
Length- 576" - 636" Height- 162" Width- 102" Ground clearance- 9.1" Skirted wake- 93.5-sq-feet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If 0.175 = 26% drag, then the rig without any mods is Cd 0.67307 With gap-seal and lower skirts, Cd 0.5953 With gap-seal, skirts, and tails, Cd 0.52607 - Cd 0.49807, delta Cd 0.028 ( 5.32% ) If the four tails are extrapolated out to their terminations, they form 'complete' tails of 128", 145.4", 229.6", and 263.3". With 48" tail with 4-sides, estimated Cd 0.452 With 60" inflatable tail ( longest allowed by DOT ), estimated Cd 0.4185 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @ 65-mph, the drag -to-mpg relationship is delta-10% Cd = delta-5% mpg -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following boat-tails, if sized to match the Lawrence Livermore semi-trailer width produce lengths of : 1910 Maurice Farman strut ( best ) 145" 1922 Jaray square-cylinder............ 129" 1933 Frey 2D section ................... 141.4" 1963 Walter Korff semi-trailer......... 191.7" 1969 W.A.Mair torpedo................... 193.8" 1976 Wysocki railroad tail.............. 163.2" 1981 NASA Shoebox ( ave. top/side ) 113.4" 1981 NASA semi-trailer.................... 146.2" 2012 Breidenbach SUV..................... 258.6" |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com