Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-05-2015, 03:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Eddie25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: south africa
Posts: 168

Fiesta - '06 Ford Fiesta 1.4 Ambiante
90 day: 45.9 mpg (US)

Dakar - '03 BMW f650 GS Dakar (retired)

Tucson - '07 Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GLS
90 day: 32.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 172
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
Aero flaps continued, advice needed

for those like myself that is not too keen on doing a full cam back or boat tail these are some aero flaps I noticed on newer cars. I am still experimenting with materials and shapes and need advice on some positions.
here are some that ive seen out ther.

Click image for larger version

Name:	2w.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	117.2 KB
ID:	16901

Click image for larger version

Name:	2w2.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	138.8 KB
ID:	16902

Click image for larger version

Name:	new-honda-civic-tourer-and-sport-guises-unveiled-in-full-at-paris-live-photos_22.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	142.1 KB
ID:	16903

this is my idea. im just not too certain if I should use option1 or option2. im worried that with option1 air would be deflected but then sucked back towards the light fixture? option 2 will be a bit more tricky to fit and it wont close the slight panel gap


Click image for larger version

Name:	EEE.png
Views:	95
Size:	17.8 KB
ID:	16904

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0401.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	116.7 KB
ID:	16905

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0399.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	123.7 KB
ID:	16906

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0402.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	122.7 KB
ID:	16907

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0400.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	86.9 KB
ID:	16908

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0403.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	96.7 KB
ID:	16909

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0373.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	80.3 KB
ID:	16910

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-05-2015, 09:45 AM   #2 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
The way I read your descriptions it seems to conflict with your drawing.

At any rate, here are the facts as I see them, Option 1 on the EEE Dwg with the device on the rearward part of the light is 10 times more effective than Option 2 of the same drawing.

Sealing the gap would gain you such an insignificant result, you'd need a super computer, advanced wind tunnel, and a team of Formula 1 aerodynamics engineers to figure out the difference in Cd.

The whole idea is to get the air to make a clean break there at the back of the car so the air just flows smoothly instead of flapping back and forth in a wavy oscillation. So putting it forward would allow the air to try and reattach gaining you nothing or possibly hurting the Cd.

That said, the gain here would be very small even if you execute the shape perfectly due to it being such a small inefficiency that you're trying to correct.

The air in the "Boundary layer" within a few centimeters of the skin of the car is not the source of drag on your vehicle. It is the air out to 10 feet to the front, top and sides and 100's of feet behind being displaced by your car as you drive through it that is creating the drag. The drag comes from the energy required to move that huge volume of air, the more it moves, and the more of it that moves, the more energy it takes, and the less efficient it is. The most efficient shapes make the air move the least amount and it goes back to being calm within the shortest period of time.

There are papers out there that show how the rear edge radius of the vehicle affects the Cd. Very large and very small radius corners do well, there is a "Death Zone" radius of like 5 to 10 centimeters as I recall that really create a large drag. I'll try to find one the papers and post it later.

Hope that makes sense.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ChazInMT For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-05-2015), BamZipPow (02-05-2015), Cd (02-07-2015), ECONORAM (02-05-2015), Eddie25 (02-06-2015)
Old 02-05-2015, 01:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
Make kerf cuts in the wood piece to help it conform to the body contour. Or, make a female mold of the wood piece, and then make flexible foam duplicates of the wood piece's shape by using Gorilla Glue, which expands and foams while curing.


BTW, what sort of aero improvement in overall CD do you reasonably expect?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Otto For This Useful Post:
Eddie25 (02-06-2015)
Old 02-05-2015, 07:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,561
Thanks: 7,736
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurney_flap

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
ECONORAM (02-05-2015)
Old 02-06-2015, 01:43 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Eddie25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: south africa
Posts: 168

Fiesta - '06 Ford Fiesta 1.4 Ambiante
90 day: 45.9 mpg (US)

Dakar - '03 BMW f650 GS Dakar (retired)

Tucson - '07 Hyundai Tucson 2.0 GLS
90 day: 32.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 172
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
apologies I see that I have the descriptions wrong way around. im not too sure exactly how much this will save but if those automakers are adding such small ones im sure it makes a difference. as for the construction of the flaps the wood you can see in the images are balsa wood used in rc plane construction. its easy to shape and mould. once I have a mould the items are going to be made from carbon fibre. I happen to have a younger brother working with this stuff daily. these are some aero pieces he made for his car to cover a channel running along his pillars. he also has a full carbon fibre engine under tray. he will be making my parts too

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0411.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	136.0 KB
ID:	16914

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0412.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	116.7 KB
ID:	16915

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0413.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	134.8 KB
ID:	16916

undertray a bit dirty but it is made of high density foam sandwiched between 2 layers of carbon fibre

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0414.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	139.4 KB
ID:	16917
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 01:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,561
Thanks: 7,736
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
The A-pillar fillet is something I should probably make for my car, for wind noise.

What I am suggesting is a 'trip strip' located at the short leg of your Option A. Since some of it would be on the taillight clear plastic might be a better material. You could use your suggested method below the taillight. At the bumper it would be a 'skeg' that could integrate into a difusser.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 01:25 PM   #7 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
there is a "Death Zone" radius of like 5 to 10 centimeters as I recall that really create a large drag. I'll try to find one the papers and post it later.
Id be very intrested in that paper too, as I think every "edge" ... or lack of an edge on the rear of my car is in the death zone
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 10:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,391

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,188
Thanked 4,378 Times in 3,353 Posts
I wonder what we'd be tinkering with if we lived on the moon.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2015, 03:46 AM   #9 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
I vote Option 1.
I'm an armchair aero geek, and know nothing of aerodynamics, but I would think that Option 1 might be a fraction of a percent better.
I base this guess on the fact that every trip strip / air ramp that I have seen, is located at least two inches within the area of the car that has a radiused edge.

Some good examples are the pictures you posted. If you notice, the body panel begins to curve a couple of inches before the trip strip.

However, there are some exceptions, such as the air ramp on the Ford Focus tailights :



A curious thing abou the Focus is the fact that the air ramp is there on a section of the light, but directly below it is a massive round edge to the bumper and area above the air ramp.

Last edited by Cd; 02-07-2015 at 03:52 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2015, 04:03 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
I I base this guess on the fact that every trip strip / air ramp that I have seen, is located at least two inches within the area of the car that has a radiused edge.
Cruze hatch has them located a long way inboard (on the window):



__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
Cd (02-07-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com