Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-11-2016, 12:19 PM   #1 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Chevy Bolt's aero is a 'disaster,'

From autoblog:

Design team leader Stuart Norris called it a "disaster for aero." They made it "big and spacious," getting a Cd of 0.32. The standard tricks of aluminum, a spoiler, underbody panels and an active grille are meant "to compensate" for it.

They killed the aero to get interior utility. On a platform who's selling point is efficiency. I'm not a fan.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Cd (04-18-2021)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-11-2016, 12:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
I wouldn't call .32 a disaster, but it certainly is sorely lacking compared to most vehicles these days which are sub .3 if they're trying at all. It would be very interesting to see the difference in range between .32 and lower CDs.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
mcrews (08-11-2016)
Old 08-11-2016, 12:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
It wasn't me, the lead designer called it that. He doesn't sound happy about being told to add more cubic feet. They even had to say that normal tweaks weren't to "make it even better," but to "make it less bad."
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Natalya (08-14-2016)
Old 08-11-2016, 02:08 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
it's the 'design' team leader. of course he's upset. design and reality and sales are very different things.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 02:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
What's the frontal square footage?
Cd is only half the equation.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
darcane (08-16-2016)
Old 08-11-2016, 03:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,156

The Tinyvan - '07 Honda Fit Sport

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth

eBike - '94 Trek Mountain Track 820
Thanks: 763
Thanked 637 Times in 424 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
I wouldn't call .32 a disaster, but it certainly is sorely lacking compared to most vehicles these days which are sub .3 if they're trying at all. It would be very interesting to see the difference in range between .32 and lower CDs.
It's no better than the 2017 Honda Fit, which is much more concerned with keeping the body short and easy to park than aero. That will certainly hurt the practical highway (70-75 mph for the average joe) range considerably, no matter what the EPA highway test cycle range says.

Disappointing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 03:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
I wouldn't call .32 a disaster, but it certainly is sorely lacking compared to most vehicles these days which are sub .3 if they're trying at all. It would be very interesting to see the difference in range between .32 and lower CDs.
Could you provide a link?

Very few cars on the road have that low of a Cd in my opinion.

The Cd of .32 is respectable, the current Porsche 911 has this Cd, it is one of the lower ones, not Prius low, but at least sports car low.

I did find this link, older model cars though.

http://www.mayfco.com/dragcd~1.htm
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 04:02 PM   #8 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,156

The Tinyvan - '07 Honda Fit Sport

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth

eBike - '94 Trek Mountain Track 820
Thanks: 763
Thanked 637 Times in 424 Posts
0.31 Honda Civic (Sedan) 2006-2011
0.28 Honda Civic (Coupe) 2006-2011
0.27 Honda Civic (Hybrid) 2006-2011

Wikipedia:
0.28 Hyundai Elantra 2011
0.28 Chevrolet Cruze sedan [99] 2015
0.29 Chevrolet Corvette 2005

Here's the one that gets me, two electric hatchbacks, both significantly (~10%) better aero than the Bolt:
0.29 BMW i3 2013
0.29 Nissan Leaf 2010

0.31 Nissan Versa 2004
0.29 Nissan Versa 2007–2008

0.29 Toyota Yaris 2006-2011
0.28 Chevrolet Volt 2010-2015
0.275 Ford Fusion 2013
0.27 Mazda6 (sedan and hatchback) 2008
0.28 Mazda3 (Hatchback) 2012
0.277 Toyota Auris hatchback 2013
0.27 Volkswagen Golf Mk7 2012–present

Yes, they could have done much better.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to samwichse For This Useful Post:
Cd (04-18-2021), dremd (09-15-2016), mcrews (08-11-2016)
Old 08-12-2016, 08:28 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
From autoblog:

Design team leader Stuart Norris called it a "disaster for aero." They made it "big and spacious," getting a Cd of 0.32. The standard tricks of aluminum, a spoiler, underbody panels and an active grille are meant "to compensate" for it.

They killed the aero to get interior utility. On a platform who's selling point is efficiency. I'm not a fan.
I don't get why he's blaming the size for the bad Cd. Isn't a larger car actually easier to get a lower Cd? Granted the overall drag is higher but basically this engineer is complaining they had bad aero along with a larger size, a double penalty. I think I read the 2017 Chrysler minivan is .30 Cd. Bad aero isn't because of the size, it's because of bad engineering.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
freebeard (08-12-2016)
Old 08-12-2016, 08:40 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by samwichse View Post
Yes, they could have done much better.
Thank you for the list, but could you please cite your source of information?

I think it's been at least 3 years since I looked at a complete Cd list, certainly improvements have been made fleet wise I can see.

Such a jump may be connected to EPA fuel economy regulations. I wonder if there is a chart for this.

Found this.......(see below)........several charts and graphs in link below.


Corporate Average Fuel Economy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpor...ation_proposal
Quote:
Model year 2012-2016 Obama Administration proposal

The new policy will result in yearly 5% increases in efficiency from 2012 through 2016...........
A 4 or 5 mpg improvement from 2012-2016 (looking at "Agreed standards by model year, 2011-2025" chart in link), I'm guessing much of this because of aerodynamic design effort and study. However I have no support for this belief other than the numbers samwichse posted and my memory of what Cd's used to be a few years ago.

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html

Last edited by kach22i; 08-12-2016 at 08:45 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com