Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-02-2011, 09:01 AM   #1 (permalink)
Above-Average-Miler
 
abogart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 50

EcoCorsica - '96 Chevrolet Corsica Base
90 day: 32.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Cruise control might be better on flat terrain

So on my 170 mile trip across Michigan yesterday, I did not use the cruise control once, entirely manual throttle control for the whole trip using the MAP, RPM, MPG, and AVG gauges on the Scangauge. The western half of the state is quite hilly, so I practiced DWL on the hills, shooting for around 7.2 MAP (psi?) on level road and inclines. Neutral coasting (engine idling) down the steeper hills gave a nice boost in avg mpg.

I did find, however, that on the flatter eastern side of the state, instantaneous mpg seemed to suffer, I would try to hold about 7.0 to 7.2 on the MAP which varied the speed between 52 and 60 mph, but inst. mpg seemed to top out at about 33.7 in that load range, when I clearly remember getting 35-40 on flat terrain before. Possibly due to headwind? I experimented with rolling the window up and turning the lights on an off, but neither one had a noticeable impact on mpg whatsoever.

This trip averaged 33.1 mpg, where I was able to average 35.6 mpg before in similar conditions. The only real difference was in not using the cruise control for most of the trip. I think when I make the return trip I am going to use cruise on the flat terrain, but practice DWL and neutral coasting in the hilly areas.

__________________

Last edited by abogart; 04-02-2011 at 09:08 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-02-2011, 11:39 PM   #2 (permalink)
38 time NHRA/IHRA Champ
 
ATaylorRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 305
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
I have noticed this too....every time you hit a hill your car automatically uses more throttle to maintain the same speed.
__________________
42 time NHRA/IHRA drag race champ

05 SRT4-12.17@117 mph on DOTs-31.0 mpg-SOLD
96 Geo Metro-3 banger-60.1 mpg-SOLD
95 BMW M3-13.41 @ 106 mph-31mpg-SOLD
77 Chevy Monza with 350/350-FOR SALE
84 Horizon-1880 lbs-29 mpg
95 Neon-43 mpg
99 Z28-10.80 @ 127 mph-27.1mpg
2011 Prius-62.1 wife's
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2011, 12:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Kodak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 346

Canyon - '07 GMC Canyon 2wd regular cab
90 day: 24.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
You're probably right. Sometimes my speed will vary a little on flat roads. Sometimes I'll aim for maybe 45mph, but find myself at 50 for a short while.

It can be tough to finesse the pedal just right, but it can be done. And wind can definitely affect your ideal throttle position.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2011, 12:51 PM   #4 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
On flat roads, the cruise control is amazing at maintaining a consistent speed, and therefore you get a good MPG. On the hills, it is a different matter entirely.

When drving a long distance, I do still use the cruise control, but when the hill is steep enough that the car is going to downshift, I put my foot on the accelerator where the cruise is at, cancel the cruise control, then give as much throttle as I can without a downshift. Some hills are steep enough where I let the torque convertor unlock but I still try to keep it in fourth.

Interestingly, when driving my minivan (weighs in @ 4K lbs empty) I found on the steeper hills, turning off the overdrive completely and holding a steady speed is more fuel efficient than allowing the car to slow down in fourth, then having to accelerate to maintain above 40. Below that, I find it impossible to get good gas mileage with an auto.

BTW a steep hill is one with more than a 10% grade
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2011, 09:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
Above-Average-Miler
 
abogart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 50

EcoCorsica - '96 Chevrolet Corsica Base
90 day: 32.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
I have found that on flat terrain, holding a set engine load (with reference to the MAP reading) works for a while, until I get down around 52 mph or so, then it takes the same amount of load to hold the vehicle at that speed. The TC locks at a very low RPM on my car in 4th gear (around 1450 at 55 mph), anything below that speed and the engine just doesn't seem to have to torque to accelerate back up to cruising speed efficiently. Adding just a little throttle brings the inst. MPG well below where it should be, and the engine lugs at this speed as well. It seems that 55 mph is just about the minimum that the engine produces efficient torque with the TC locked.

On the other end of the spectrum, anything above 55 seems to be inefficient due to drag and resistance, as it takes a higher engine load to maintain speed here as well.

So it seems that if I want to cruise at a constant speed on level terrain, cruise control set at 55 is the way to go. I don't really think very much efficiency is lost by varying engine load up and down at a set speed. We know that engines are more efficient at high load in the lowest rpm that produces the most effective torque, so accelerating up hills in 4th gear with the TC locked should not produce any loss of efficiency. Rather, the loss is in the engine braking action due to pumping losses as the car coasts down the hill in-gear, or even adds fuel to maintain speed when none is needed. I have found that backing off the throttle and letting the TC unlock on light descending inclines gives higher numbers than trying to maintain a specific load and keep the TC locked.

Pulse & glide with the engine idling and trans. in N seems to work quite well on both hilly terrain and level terrain, especially between 60 mph and 52 mph. So my new strategy will be to practice P&G EIC on hills and when practical wherever else, but to set the cruise at 55 in traffic or when not wanting to P&G. We'll see if this does anything to my avg mpg over a few tanks.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 12:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 364

ZX - '97 Citroen ZX Monaco
OldContinents
90 day: 61.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
On relative flat area I got almost 28MPG with cruise in 1986 Pontiac full size STW with winter tires, I was pretty impressed, but I guess it does a good job when conditions don't change too much.

It had that 307 and TH200-R4 box, desert gearing they said, so it had really low rpm at 50MPH where car is limited by law here.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 10:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Bicycle shifter, attached to the accelerator peddle.
__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 02:25 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Utah, SLC
Posts: 81

Racer XD - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT
Team Hyundai
90 day: 33.26 mpg (US)

Racer XD 2013 - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT
90 day: 31.48 mpg (US)

Racer XD 2014 - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Racer XD 2012 - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT

Racer XD 2011 - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bestclimb View Post
Bicycle shifter, attached to the accelerator peddle.
Hahaha has any one tried this?
__________________
2006 Hyundai Elantra GT 2.0L (Manual)
Weapon-R secret weapon intake with ram air kit ScanGauge Belly Pan

http://www.cars.com/ City 27 mpg - Highway 34 mpg
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/ City 23 mpg - Highway 31 mpg - Combined 26 mpg

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 04:51 PM   #9 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wildfire8 View Post
Hahaha has any one tried this?
I have this installed on my car. Helps to keep constant throttle position on long drives. Not for use when sleepy.
__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Utah, SLC
Posts: 81

Racer XD - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT
Team Hyundai
90 day: 33.26 mpg (US)

Racer XD 2013 - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT
90 day: 31.48 mpg (US)

Racer XD 2014 - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Racer XD 2012 - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT

Racer XD 2011 - '06 Hyundi Elantra GT
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bestclimb View Post
I have this installed on my car. Helps to keep constant throttle position on long drives. Not for use when sleepy.
Do you have a how to for this trick?

__________________
2006 Hyundai Elantra GT 2.0L (Manual)
Weapon-R secret weapon intake with ram air kit ScanGauge Belly Pan

http://www.cars.com/ City 27 mpg - Highway 34 mpg
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/ City 23 mpg - Highway 31 mpg - Combined 26 mpg

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com