Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-17-2011, 09:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 62

2005 Dakota - '05 Dodge Dakota SLT
90 day: 15.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Engine controls, overheating, and HAI/CAI's

For reference, I've done some decent tweeking on Mustangs and their ECU's, and that's where most of my information comes from on this topic. Some things I will state as fact, some I won't, and I will try to be deliberate on this.
__________________________________________________ __________

With temperatures outside reaching 90+ and heat indexes in the good old 110's my truck has decided that sitting in stop and go traffic with the air on and pulling a trailer is too much for it. The temperature gauge goes up past the 220 mark, but not quite all the way to the RED ZONE. Now, what does your car do when this happens?

Well, I know that with my mustang ECU, the computer actually RICHENED the mixture some to help it cool down. This may be true across the board, as a lean mixture becomes too lean due to the temperature of the engine. This is opposite of why you need it when your car is cold. The fuel burning helps warm it up, and then it leans it out when you are at operating temperatures. Go PAST operating temperatures, however, and the extra fuel is supposed to help cool it down. Like I said, I don't know if this is true across the board or not, but take it into consideration.

Now, if we're putting on grill blocks, and making our HAI to suck up that heat from the motor, AND it's 90+ degrees out, the computer will start throwing more fuel in there. Not good for fuel economy.

My hypothesis: A HAI will increase MPG's in temps less than 80* and a CAI will increase MPG's MORE than 80*

My testing: I have an intake (properly tuned using calculations for intake size, port size, TB size, cam specs, displacement, etc.) and a make-shift heat shield. When the temps are hot (80+) I will be putting on the heat shield. When they are less, I will remove. Since the next couple weeks look to be in the 90+ range, this shouldn't be too hard to figure my MPG's.

I will also be monitoring the tire pressure, only filling up in the morning before everything has warmed up, and installing or removing the shield itself only in the morning.

My last partial tank I watched it as the engine certainly took longer to warm up, which made me thing I should have a way to close/open it as it warms/cools, but the engineering behind that is just farther than I really need to do atm.

Lemme know what you think and lemme know any suggestions/questions/concerns!
Blu3

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-17-2011, 11:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Just a quick question , when you say engine reaching 220F is that the point fans kick in or is it going higher after fan are on ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2011, 12:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
I have been wondering about this too, but I don't have your experience. So I'll be watching with interest. Quick question: why 80* and not 90* ambient temp as the cutoff?
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2011, 01:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
80'F vs. 90'F must be the point where that engine has to pull back the timing to prevent preinition. When the timing dials back you lose power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2011, 03:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 62

2005 Dakota - '05 Dodge Dakota SLT
90 day: 15.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdKiefer View Post
Just a quick question , when you say engine reaching 220F is that the point fans kick in or is it going higher after fan are on ?
My current truck has a mechanical fan which is probably stuck on all the time. Sure seems like it anyways. After 160* i KNOW it is.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2011, 03:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 62

2005 Dakota - '05 Dodge Dakota SLT
90 day: 15.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
80'F vs. 90'F must be the point where that engine has to pull back the timing to prevent preinition. When the timing dials back you lose power.
I'm looking into the ECU information for my tuck , but it's hard to tell really.
I had to get a cutoff point, and at 80* F with a grill block, the engine can start to overheat. at 90*+ like this WHOLE week is supposed to be, It WILL overheat.

One hole in this theory, is if the truck does indeed give it a rich mixture like my old mustang did.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 08:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 62

2005 Dakota - '05 Dodge Dakota SLT
90 day: 15.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Well... a tank done with the shield in. Not a huge difference, but seems better by a bit than the previous.
16.6 mpg.
It's not a huge jump, but I'm going to just go by the thought that in the summer in these 90* days, it's worth it to have. Especially if I would be towing etc.

In the winter... take it out! Get that HAI going.
I will test with another full tanks, as it's above 80 for the rest of the week as well.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 08:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
Driving the TurboWeasel
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 459
Thanks: 14
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
That jibes with the experiences in my Buick. With a full grille block my engine temperatures were 188-190*F. The fans were reprogrammed to come on at 186*F. Removing 1/4 of the block let the engine stay below 186*F. My IAT's also came down since I hacked up my airbox to serve as a WAI in the winter, and it was working too well in that fashion.

It looks like big pushrod V6's and V8's don't benefit as much from these mods as much as a smaller OHC I-4 does.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2011, 09:18 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 62

2005 Dakota - '05 Dodge Dakota SLT
90 day: 15.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99LeCouch View Post
That jibes with the experiences in my Buick. With a full grille block my engine temperatures were 188-190*F. The fans were reprogrammed to come on at 186*F. Removing 1/4 of the block let the engine stay below 186*F. My IAT's also came down since I hacked up my airbox to serve as a WAI in the winter, and it was working too well in that fashion.

It looks like big pushrod V6's and V8's don't benefit as much from these mods as much as a smaller OHC I-4 does.
Most of it depends on HOW hot you're getting, and where your engine starts putting in more fuel or removing timing in order to help the overheating engine. Either way is bad for fuel economy. But yes, a 4 banger without a turbo or a hot cam or anything will be in a lighter car with less stress to begin with, which is why they can get away with more.

My truck on the other hand, with a MONSTER grill, and even a scoop in the lower grill to channel MORE air was above the 220 mark and on it's way to the RED ZONE just sitting in traffic with the AC and the HAI. I'd like to design a grille block, but it's just not feasable in this weather. Thus the experiment with the CAI

So far, a small increase. I'll probably mess with switching it back and forth with and without the shield.

either way, I"ll be designing it a bit better and making a more secure solution. Yet, make it removable for winter.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com