EcoModder.com

EcoModder.com (https://ecomodder.com/forum/)
-   Hybrids (https://ecomodder.com/forum/hybrids.html)
-   -   Chevy Volt driven by ABG (and good video on Jay Leno's Garage) (https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/chevy-volt-driven-abg-good-video-jay-lenos-11232.html)

NeilBlanchard 11-30-2009 01:21 PM

Chevy Volt driven by ABG (and good video on Jay Leno's Garage)
 
Hi,

The good folks over at AutoBlogGreen have driven a pre-production Volt, and they are the first journalists to drive it with the ICE running:

Quick Spin: 2011 Chevrolet Volt charges toward production — Autoblog Green

cfg83 11-30-2009 03:13 PM

NeilBlanchard -

Neato. I like the air dam detail. It looks verrrrrry familiar :

http://ecomodder.com/forum/member-cf...lt-air-dam.jpg

It looks like it's in 3 parts. I wonder if it is spring loaded so it can collapse when you hit a curb.

CarloSW2

cfg83 11-30-2009 03:43 PM

Hello -

This is an interesting blurb :

Quote:

When we first talked to GM about the Volt three years ago, the thought was that the engine would simply run at a constant speed to maintain the battery charge. As development has continued, that strategy has evolved. The output of the engine/generator is based on the needs of the battery and motor, not what the driver is demanding. As the level of the battery changes, the generator is controlled to provide the necessary, electrical output. The engine speed in turn is selected to maximize the load on the engine. An engine runs most efficiently at full load. If the electrical demand is low, a lower engine speed is used in conjunction with the generator control to get the desired load.
I was expecting a single-RPM engine.

CarloSW2

tasdrouille 11-30-2009 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cfg83 (Post 142792)
NeilBlanchard -

Neato. I like the air dam detail. It looks verrrrrry familiar :

http://ecomodder.com/forum/member-cf...lt-air-dam.jpg

Our cars are starting to look normal again!

Now that this stuff is going mainstream, maybe my wife will let me put the airdam back on the Elantra...

http://www.ecomodder.com/forum/attac...1&d=1206395604

Quote:

Originally Posted by cfg83 (Post 142802)
Hello -

I was expecting a single-RPM engine.

CarloSW2

Well, it's a good news it's not fixed rpm. It allows to pick up the most efficient operating point for every load level.

cfg83 11-30-2009 06:56 PM

Hello -

Accidently found this image :

http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/...urb-weight.jpg

This means the Volt is designed to ride about 2" lower than the Cruze.

CarloSW2

cfg83 11-30-2009 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tasdrouille (Post 142817)
...

Well, it's a good news it's not fixed rpm. It allows to pick up the most efficient operating point for every load level.

Yes, you're right. It's just that I've been hoping that the "ideal" would be viable in the real world, aka an engine designed to run at a single RPM. They also ditched the 1.0 V3 Turbo in favor of the 1.4 V4.

[EDIT: V3 and V4 are the wrong term, I meant to say I3 and I4]

CarloSW2

NeilBlanchard 12-01-2009 09:27 AM

Popular Mechanics has now also driven the Volt, and they have a video that explains the reason for the change in the charging scheme: they want you to return home with an "empty" battery so you will charge it there, where it is the most efficient.

GM 2011 Chevy Volt Test Drive - 2011 Chevrolet Volt Pre-Production Test Drive - Popular Mechanics

jamesqf 12-01-2009 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cfg83 (Post 142866)
This means the Volt is designed to ride about 2" lower than the Cruze.

I don't think that has anything to do with ride height. It's just that the center of gravity is lower, presumably because of the batteries mounted low in the frame.

MetroMPG 12-01-2009 01:04 PM

More reviews:

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/b.../1201Volt2.jpg

The National Post (Canada) has a review:
Exclusive Preview: 2011 Chevrolet Volt - Posted Driving

So does the LA Times:
Chevrolet Volt: A sneak peek at GM's plug-in hybrid -- latimes.com

I've moved this over to the "Hybrids" subforum. As much as GM is fighting tooth and nail to convince people (journalists) to not call the car a hybrid, it certainly doesn't fit in our Fossil Fuel Free section! Series hybrid EV is probably as close as it gets.

Apparently we can expect to see a video on Jay Leno's Garage too.

MetroMPG 12-01-2009 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesqf (Post 143046)
I don't think that has anything to do with ride height. It's just that the center of gravity is lower, presumably because of the batteries mounted low in the frame.

Coincidentally, the ride height is also about 2 inches lower than the Cruze.

Not disagreeing about the effect of the pack on C.G.

http://ecomodder.com/forum/member-cf...volt-cruze.jpg

Of course these are both pre-production vehicles; no saying if their ride heights are definitely what consumers are going to see.

cfg83 12-01-2009 01:34 PM

jamesqf -

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesqf (Post 143046)
I don't think that has anything to do with ride height. It's just that the center of gravity is lower, presumably because of the batteries mounted low in the frame.

[EDIT: NEVERMIND, now I get it, as Frank says below]

Maybe so. The pictures says "xx mm Above Ground", so I think they are talking about ground clearance. The picture may have it wrong though. It was an accidental google find on my part that is from here :

New Car Reviews, Ratings & Pricing, Auto News for New Models

I am trying to find the original article it was associated with, but I am having no luck.

CarloSW2

Frank Lee 12-01-2009 02:59 PM

The 516/566 mm values (over 20") are for center of gravity height which is not an indicator of ride height.

RobertSmalls 12-01-2009 06:07 PM

Quote:

In fact there is nothing in the car that tells the driver that the engine is running. According to Farah, the intent is to make everything as transparent as possible for the driver. He tells us that the Volt team is designing the car for mainstream audiences rather than the hyper-miling crowd. They wanted people to just get in the car and focus on driving rather than watching all the gauges and trying to eek out every last foot from a gallon of gas.
Quote:

Looking back at the EV1, that car featured a long tear drop tail to help ease the air stream off. Because of the need to make the Volt a four-seater with a real trunk, that shape was not a practical alternative.
Quote:

When we arrived for our drive session, the car was plugged in to get some juice back in the battery. Vehicle chief engineer Andrew Farah rode shot gun with us as we set out with the battery gauge indicating six miles of electric range.
*sigh* It wasn't designed for eco-nerds, it's been dumbed down for a broader audience. That also explains the "need" for a trunk.

Have they released specs on battery chemistry, voltage, and mass? And they're not really down to six miles of electric range, are they? A few years back, they were talking up 40mi, and later 32mi.

This car has been the subject of much hype for three years, and it had better live up to that hype.

MetroMPG 12-01-2009 06:37 PM

The Popular Mechanics video was a bit lame. Talking head of the GM engineer. No, thanks! Show the car, please.

I'm counting on the Leno video being better.

NeilBlanchard 12-02-2009 12:46 PM

Hi,

Do we know if the Volt's ICE is an Atkinson cycle? I wonder what the trade off in efficiency is between the way they have chosen to vary the ICE's RPM to match the requirements of the electric traction motor (and to NOT charge the battery, so that you will need to charge it with the plug) VS running the ICE at a fixed RPM where it is running at a peak efficiency and just charge the battery?

In other words, they chose to only run the ICE to power the traction motor in order to force you to charge the battery only with the plug. The alternative would be to run the ICE more efficiently, and then use the plug to "top off" the battery.

Which way will yield better FE?

My guess is for shorter trips, that require only a little bit of the ICE, the way they have done it might be better -- the shorter (over the battery's range) the better. But for longer trips, say driving all day and using the whole tank of gas in one trip, I would guess that the alternate would have been much better.

If the alternative method is the more efficient way to use the gasoline, then it seems like they have made a poor choice. Because in the current set up, you will use more gasoline AND more electricity...

dcb 12-02-2009 01:50 PM

recharging the battery completely from the ice makes zero sense efficiency wise. If you want best FE, drain the battery and don't put any energy back in it till you get home.

Though they probably do borrow a little capacity just to smooth out the engine cycles. Anyone who defeats that to recharge completely with the ICE should suffer the full ire of the EPA.

MetroMPG 12-02-2009 02:14 PM

Remember, this is an electric car primarily. It's meant for the vast majority of the US population that drives around 40 miles or less per day, with a series generator for the atypical excursions beyond that.

Anyone who buys a Volt and regularly drives long distances is sort of missing the point, as far as energy efficiency goes. (And may even get better mileage from a Prius or TDI - we don't know yet).

NeilBlanchard 12-02-2009 08:51 PM

Hi guys,

I was speculating -- if it gets better FE running the ICE at a constant RPM to power the electric motor AND charge the battery, than it does just powering the electric motor, then what is the point?

I want it to work which ever way gets the best FE.

cfg83 12-02-2009 09:28 PM

NeilBlanchard -

I agree with you in principle, but I understand "range anxiety" :

Quote:

They explained that among the biggest lessons learned from the EV1 program were that range anxiety and lack of practicality would make a car like EV1 nearly impossible to sell in the mass market
From my POV, I just want to see this "different solution" to compete in the market with the Insight and the Prius dirvetrains.

From an MPG-for-my-money POV, I will compare the Volt to the Prius :

BASE Prius II retail = $22,400 MRSP
Volt (speculated) = $40,000
=> The Volt costs 78% more than a base Prius

From our POV, that would mean the Volt needs to deliver the comparable benefit in MPG :

Prius = 51/48 MPG
Volt = 91/85 MPG

Is this a lofty target based on the Volt tech? I don't know. Depends on distance/speed driven, right?

CarloSW2

MetroMPG 12-29-2009 08:15 AM

Jay Leno's video look at the car is up:

Green Garage: 2011 Chevy Volt - Hybrids - Jay Leno's Garage

euromodder 04-06-2011 04:04 PM

ABG drives the Volt again.
 
Well, they've driven the finalized versoion, and the result is far removed from the initially claimed 230 mpg.

Review: 2011 Chevrolet Volt — Autoblog Green

Quote:

We drove the Volt over the course of four days and put around 165 miles on the clock in mixed driving. During that time, we purposefully drained the battery a few times in order to give the 1.4-liter engine a workout, but also kept the vehicle on the charger and in a climate-controlled garage when not in use. At the end of our stint, we burnt a whopping 2.064 gallons of premium fuel for a final average of 79.94 mpg.
While the numerical value may look good, it means that despite doing only 165 miles in 4 days - average 41 miles, very close to the Volt's electric range - they still burned 2 gallons of fuel in addition to using the battery power.

Doing any longer trips is only going to make things worse.
Given the elevated price tag if you can't get all the rebates, this is one for the eco-yuppies.

gone-ot 04-06-2011 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cfg83 (Post 142866)
Hello -

Accidently found this image :

http://images.thetruthaboutcars.com/...urb-weight.jpg

This means the Volt is designed to ride about 2" lower than the Cruze.

CarloSW2

...duh, that 2-inch "drop" in CG is directly due to the "low" postioning of the batteries.

...talk about Detroit "double-speak"! -- hey, let's turn a deficit into an advantage...you know all that low-slung battery "weight"? Well, let's advertise it as "lowered-CG for bettery handling" and see if they (we?) buy it?"

Hubert Farnsworth 04-06-2011 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cfg83 (Post 142871)
Yes, you're right. It's just that I've been hoping that the "ideal" would be viable in the real world, aka an engine designed to run at a single RPM. They also ditched the 1.0 V3 Turbo in favor of the 1.4 V4.

CarloSW2

1.0L Inline 3 (I3) vs 1.4L inline 4 (I4) there were only ever a few automotive V4 engines, mostly from Lancia, Ford of Germany, and SAAB.

cfg83 04-06-2011 08:02 PM

Old Tele man -

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Tele man (Post 230165)
...duh, that 2-inch "drop" in CG is directly due to the "low" postioning of the batteries.

...talk about Detroit "double-speak"! -- hey, let's turn a deficit into an advantage...you know all that low-slung battery "weight"? Well, let's advertise it as "lowered-CG for bettery handling" and see if they (we?) buy it?"

Actually that's not really a Detroit thing. EVs advertise this all the time :

Electric Vehicle (EV) Safety
Quote:

With more and more EVs on the road the safety of EVs is being closely studied. To date, findings are positive and have shown that several EV features maximize safety. For example, EVs tend to have a lower center of gravity that makes them less likely to roll over. EVs have less potential for major fires or explosions. And the body construction and durability of EVs enhance vehicle safety in a collision.
CarloSW2

cfg83 04-06-2011 08:04 PM

Hubert -

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hubert Farnsworth (Post 230168)
1.0L Inline 3 (I3) vs 1.4L inline 4 (I4) there were only ever a few automotive V4 engines, mostly from Lancia, Ford of Germany, and SAAB.

You're absolutely right. My mistake. I am not nuanced when it comes to car-speak. I will sometimes call my four-banger a V4 because I am borrowing the V8 term.

CarloSW2

gone-ot 04-07-2011 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cfg83 (Post 230183)
Old Tele man -

Actually that's not really a Detroit thing. EVs advertise this all the time :

Electric Vehicle (EV) SafetyCarloSW2

...in Politics, it's called "Spin."

...in Marketing, it's called "Hype."

...in reality, it's called "B.S." (wink,wink)

MetroMPG 04-08-2011 04:45 PM

That was funny, Old Tele Man!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com