Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Closed Thread  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2019, 11:44 AM   #4531 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Re: the Yellow Vest movement. "itís not the gas tax thatís the problem. Itís inequality thatís the problem." https://www.resilience.org/stories/2...al-transition/

 
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-15-2019, 11:59 AM   #4532 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,126

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 28.24 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 27.52 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 16.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 3,787 Times in 2,843 Posts
Stupid movement. Redistributing wealth doesn't reduce emissions because the poor will spend the money just as the rich; only they can't afford EVs.

As I've said, the two most viable ways to reduce emissions are:

1. Reduce population
2. Reduce wealth (for everyone)

I suppose redistribution of wealth actually accomplishes #2, because countries that do this are among the poorest in the world.

It's great that places like France exist, so that we can feel fortunate we don't have to live there.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
 
Old 01-15-2019, 12:19 PM   #4533 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 22,554
Thanks: 6,332
Thanked 7,226 Times in 5,877 Posts
Quote:
Again, too heavy and somehow poor aerodynamics.
The house or the car. If it's the house I agree completely.
__________________
.
.

Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are.
anonymous poster
____________________

ē If you loan someone $20 and you never see them again because they are avoiding paying you back, that makes it worth $20.
Kevin Kelly
____________________
 
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (01-15-2019)
Old 01-15-2019, 12:51 PM   #4534 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,893

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,448
Thanked 2,929 Times in 1,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by All Darc View Post
Again, too heavy and somehow poor aerodynamics.

Besides, for heavy cars with poor aerodynamic, I believe not all homes would have space/rood area for solar power for home use plus heavy vehicles use.
The STELLA car is amazing, but it is waaaay too expensive: the two super efficient hub motors cost about $30k each.

Most homes can have much more than 900-1000 watts of solar, which is what is on the STELLA car - and on a building, solar panels can be MUCH more productive, because they are fixed. On the car, they would be in shadow a lot of the time.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
 
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-16-2019), redpoint5 (01-15-2019)
Old 01-15-2019, 01:11 PM   #4535 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,476
Thanks: 14
Thanked 363 Times in 327 Posts
Low weight and low dragh helps reduce energy used. Lower energy lower thermoelectric activity. Lower energy consume means less battery pack.
Solar panel on the vehicle also reduces the need of a lot of batteries.

The solar output, for home, matters if you think in reduce fossil fuel use.

Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
It's a viable product despite poor aero. There's no such thing as perfect, just good enough.

Doesn't matter if the solar output is enough because you connect the house to the grid.

If you missed my point somehow, I'll just tell you. Putting solar on the roof of a vehicle is beyond retarded.
 
Old 01-15-2019, 01:16 PM   #4536 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,476
Thanks: 14
Thanked 363 Times in 327 Posts


Bike home... Measured in miles per burguer...



Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The house or the car. If it's the house I agree completely.
 
The Following User Says Thank You to All Darc For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-16-2019)
Old 01-15-2019, 01:26 PM   #4537 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,476
Thanks: 14
Thanked 363 Times in 327 Posts
In The Twilight Zone maybe there is a universe/dimention where only rich people destroys the environment. So Tesla have a great idea for such paralell universe.



Stella it's low weight and aerodynamic. If was as a usual car it would require 4x more electric energy. So you must consider as 3600W of extra solar panels for home.
Yes, it's expensive, but there is a Indian solar home car project much more affordable. Good efficient motor but not the best, but good enought (a bit more than 90% but not 98%)

The own solar panels on car also reduze the need of many battery packs, and so reduces the weight of the car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
The STELLA car is amazing, but it is waaaay too expensive: the two super efficient hub motors cost about $30k each.

Most homes can have much more than 900-1000 watts of solar, which is what is on the STELLA car - and on a building, solar panels can be MUCH more productive, because they are fixed. On the car, they would be in shadow a lot of the time.
 
Old 01-15-2019, 03:14 PM   #4538 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 22,554
Thanks: 6,332
Thanked 7,226 Times in 5,877 Posts


Once again, how much does that weigh?


https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post527737

I live in one of these, I won't be posting pictures of my own example.

Quote:
Low weight and low dragh helps reduce energy used.
If money weren't an problem, I'd make one of these. Flexible panels could lay over the dihedral angles.



Back on topic.

__________________
.
.

Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are.
anonymous poster
____________________

ē If you loan someone $20 and you never see them again because they are avoiding paying you back, that makes it worth $20.
Kevin Kelly
____________________
 
Old 01-15-2019, 03:34 PM   #4539 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 10,126

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 28.24 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 27.52 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 16.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,498
Thanked 3,787 Times in 2,843 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by All Darc View Post
Low weight and low dragh helps reduce energy used. Lower energy lower thermoelectric activity. Lower energy consume means less battery pack.
Solar panel on the vehicle also reduces the need of a lot of batteries.

The solar output, for home, matters if you think in reduce fossil fuel use.
Low drag isn't so important in a vehicle designed to be driven locally, at slower speeds, as a commuter and grocery getter.

Solar doesn't reduce battery size requirements at all.

Solar belongs on a roof or dedicated stationary structure, not objects that move about the environment.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
 
Old 01-15-2019, 04:50 PM   #4540 (permalink)
In the fasting lane
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,987

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 50.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,705
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,444 Posts
If solar is cheap, light and robust enough to apply to the roof of an EV - why not? It can help keep the car cool in summer, it can prevent bricking the battery when the car isn't used for a long time. But it won't have a big effect on range.
Yet, any help, however small, is a benefit.

Stella Vie is super light and has a gigantic solar panel. Therefore it can potentially run hundreds of miles a day on solar alone. If your car has 4 times the drag and a quarter of the area at half the PV efficiency, only about 10 added miles remain.

The better batteries get, the less reason to mount PV panels on cars.

__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.17 Gmeter or 0.1 Mmile.



Investors woes:
"In hindsight, I should have placed a bet on the horse that won the race"
"In hindsight, I should have bet more on that horse"
 
The Following User Says Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-16-2019)
Closed Thread  Post New Thread


Tags
lies, opinion, reality, scam

Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com