Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2014, 05:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Increased tire pressure and center wear (tread depth checked after 1 year / 30k mi.)

Ok so it's pretty well established that increased tire pressure increases mileage. We often hear about how awful the handling will be if you increase pressure, and how our tires will be worthless in a few thousand miles as the center wears away quickly.

So I measured my front left tire last winter about this time, drove for a year and accumulated a little under 30,000 miles. The tires were inflated to the max inflation on the sidewall, at 44psi. I maintained this once a month never needing to add more than 4psi to bring it back up. Subaru recommends 26psi. I make no claims here about how much the change has effected mileage as that has been tested elsewhere, and my drive cycle is not anyone else's drive cycle.

Front left tire, cooper CS4 mounted on a Subaru forester.
The tire has 3 grooves running the circumference. one center and one about 1.5 inches from each edge. The measurements were taken at the grooves.

at 169,000 miles on jan 29
Inner
.321"
middle
.322"
outer
.314

average tread depth
.319"

then at 195,000 miles on jan 21
Inner
.245
middle
.240
outer
.224

average tread depth
.236

Change
inner
.076"
middle
.082"
outer
.09"

average wear
.082

I'm not going to make any claims that the uneven treadwear is not going to happen as I don't have a large data set but on this 1 data point it does not seem to be an issue. What these measurements do tell me is that I need to rotate my tires and do an alignment.

__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.

Last edited by bestclimb; 01-21-2014 at 08:09 PM.. Reason: fix typo
  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bestclimb For This Useful Post:
Andrei_ierdnA (07-25-2017), brucepick (03-17-2016), MetroMPG (01-21-2014), redpoint5 (01-21-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-21-2014, 06:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Thanks for posting your data!

My experience (Pontiac Firefly/Chev Metro):

- 155/80r13 tires
- 30,000 km / ~20,000 miles
- PSI significantly above sidewall maximum (44 PSI)

No obvious center wear (by eyeball, not by depth gauge).

I won't be surprised to learn there are some vehicle/tire combinations where the tires have worn in the center from high pressure. Best advice is to monitor/measure rather than set & forget.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2014, 06:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Whatever pushes out on the center also pushes out equally on both sides. Typically front tires wear out on the outer edges from cornering. Rotate front to rear on same side.
In 100k + miles (several vehicles and tire types) on tires inflated to 44 PSI I have seen no sign of center wear, in fact the tires last a good bit longer at those pressures.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2014, 07:00 PM   #4 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,396

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,192
Thanked 4,380 Times in 3,354 Posts
I can never get the center to wear out faster than the outside edge. This is probably because I like to drive without brakes, which means I'm carrying a lot of corner speed.

I was hoping that over-inflation would show increased center wear so that I can use that strategy to even out my tire wear.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2014, 07:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
I agree.

I have always had my tires between 35-38lbs and in the last year and a half went to 40-44lbs. No abnormal wear and the tires last longer, no rounded shoulders.
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2014, 01:29 AM   #6 (permalink)
Too many cars
 
Gasoline Fumes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York State
Posts: 1,568

CRXFi - '88 Honda CRX XFi

Insight 256 - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights

Insight 5342 (no IMA) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 66.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,316
Thanked 781 Times in 465 Posts
I had 175/70-13 Blizzaks wear in the center at 35 PSI (sidewall max). I'm now running 155/80-13 Blizzaks (same model) at 40 PSI. Wear seems fairy even, maybe because they're skinnier?

My 185/65-14 summer tires have more wear on the sides at 55-60 PSI. Sidewall max is 44 PSI. They're used tires, so some of the uneven wear could've come with them.
__________________
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2006 Honda Insight (parts car)
1988 Honda CRXFi
1994 Geo Metro

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2014, 05:59 AM   #7 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,022

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 992
Thanked 396 Times in 283 Posts
I should measure mine. I do not have original measurements, but brand new tires, I imagine they were even.

One thing I thought was when the center wears down a bit, there has to be a terminal point to when the sides start wearing down, too.

Is anyone else seeing their rear tires wear down faster than their front tires?
__________________





Best Tanks:
Mustang - 54.83 mpg (US) at the Green Grand Prix
Insight - 82.91966 mpg (US) over 818.5 miles.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2014, 07:54 AM   #8 (permalink)
Southern Squidbillie
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Heart of Dixie
Posts: 97
Thanks: 50
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
Subaru?--Might want to check that front wheel alignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by bestclimb View Post
Front left tire, cooper CS4 mounted on a Subaru forester.
at 169,000 miles on jan 29
average tread depth
.319"

then at 195,000 miles on jan 21
average tread depth
.236

Change
inner
.076"
middle
.082"
outer
.09"

average wear
.082

... What these measurements do tell me is that I need to rotate my tires and do an alignment.
That's some good data, thanks for sharing.

i noticed years ago that Subaru ran positive camber on the front wheels--never understood why since it grinds up the front outer edges. The late models such as yours probably don't do that anymore, but doesn't hurt to check.

Over 26k miles you are wearing at .003 inch per 1k miles so you will get about 58k miles down to 1/16. The outer-to-inner wear wedge of .014 looks like excessive toe-in to me, camber wear is much worse. But even zero toe with a slight positive camber could give you that also. So measure the alignment and post up the results.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2014, 02:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bestclimb View Post
We often hear about how awful the handling will be if you increase pressure...
Only by people who have never tried it, or have only tried it on competition-grade tires or racing slicks. Every street tire I have tried it on (so far about a dozen brands/models/sizes) has given me better handling at higher pressures than the placard pressures. The transient response, in particular, was hugely improved--but the ultimate grip level was better as well.



Quote:
Originally Posted by kennybobby View Post
i noticed years ago that Subaru ran positive camber on the front wheels--never understood why since it grinds up the front outer edges.
Probably to promote understeer. If the nose of the car hits the wall, it's your fault for driving too fast. If the tail hits the wall, it's the car maker's fault for selling you an unstable car... At least, that seems to be the opinion of several courts over the years. Understeer is viewed as safe and easy to control, while oversteer is viewed as unsafe and difficult to control.

I prefer to be able to get either one depending on how I am driving, but I'm a little odd in my preferences.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2016, 03:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I was going to wait to post this because I wanted to look in my records to see how many years and miles I have on this set of tires but... heck with it.

I stopped by a tire shop to borrow their tread depth gauge a while back to see how my inflation strategy was working. F150, tires only a few years old, I'd guess less than 20,000 miles. From new I tried 50 psi (44 sidewall max) but it rode like it had solid tires so I backed off to 46, which they've been at practically the whole time. The center is wearing faster than either of the sides, front and rear, on both sides. So I'm going to back off at least 4 psi and see how that goes.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com