Forget Politics, AGW, Peak OIL, IRAN - THIS IS SERIOUS
Split from the "Smiles" thread :
The BIG debate. FWD vs. RWD. Or The layout of the gods vs. something cobbled together in 1902 because someone needed to put the grubby bits somewhere with the limited technology and engineering available. An extra bonus side discussion - Why isn't the engine at the rear in most modern cars ? |
Quote:
I'll Bite:D please see your signature re-arranged and reworded Quote:
and it wouldnt be so easy to find the D!*Kheads in a traffic jam:rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
I don't think we should discard the options of side or diagonal drive so early in the debate!
(Unlike the ludicrous one-corner drive!) |
Indeed - any idea is welcome, including the infamous VW experiment with a rear engined, front wheel drive car. My sig-quote refers to this rather exotic beauty though
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/image...-Berline_4.jpg FWD with a V12 - whats not to like :D |
Or how about FWD when you only have one front wheel ?
http://estb.msn.com/i/3D/A5FC2629876...3BAC2F1DC5.jpg |
|
Quote:
regards Mech |
Front? Rear? 4? How about SIX wheel drive. More is better, right?
http://ts1.mm.bing.net/images/thumbn...3e348f67_z.jpg |
@Daox - that beetle has some emissions issues - maybe something needs cleaning out, probably the pants of the driver following just around the time that pic was taken ?
Wheels are so last week, how about fins ? http://www.lotusespritturbo.com/Lotu...o_Loved_Me.jpg |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com