Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-24-2012, 09:41 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 21

Smokingwheels - '84 Nissan Bluebird wagon LX
90 day: 35.99 mpg (US)

Red Z - '79 Nissan 280 ZX

Blue Ford - '95 Ford Falcon GLI
90 day: 18.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via MSN to Smokingwheels Send a message via Yahoo to Smokingwheels
Has anyone tried this type of porting?

Way back in 2002 I ported an engine with a wire wheels. Long story but I ended up destroying the crank before I could control the strange timing curve.
See blue line on graph but this was with the compression up at 12.5:1.

In 2005 I tried again on another engine which is still running today but has been sabotaged once with silicon in the oil.

My timing on my engine runs similar to this pic

My engine is really touchy with the spark timing so its not set and forget..
If it goes out of tune it uses more fuel than it should like now I have lost one of my load switches to adjust the timing.

It used to have more power that normal until I overheated it in 2005.

I have been keeping some records over the years and have updated my fuel log with the good ones, sometimes it runs worst that a model T Ford...
1984 Nissan Bluebird wagon LX Gas Mileage (Smokingwheels) - EcoModder.com

I have had to put a second fuel pump in to keep up with WOT when it was in peak condition.

Warning if you want a temperamental engine that performs micricals sometimes then try this to you head ports and inlet manifold if you have a spare one and can program an different timing curve into you ECU.


Last edited by Smokingwheels; 10-24-2012 at 11:37 AM.. Reason: Pics not showing
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-24-2012, 10:26 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Only your last image is loading for me.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 11:36 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
I'm not sure I understand what you're suggesting, you mean take off the intake manifold and use a wire wheel to rough up its interior and this makes the whole engine finnicky about timing advance but better on fuel?
__________________
Work From Home mod has saved more fuel than everything else put together.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 11:47 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 21

Smokingwheels - '84 Nissan Bluebird wagon LX
90 day: 35.99 mpg (US)

Red Z - '79 Nissan 280 ZX

Blue Ford - '95 Ford Falcon GLI
90 day: 18.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via MSN to Smokingwheels Send a message via Yahoo to Smokingwheels
Quote:
Originally Posted by shovel View Post
I'm not sure I understand what you're suggesting, you mean take off the intake manifold and use a wire wheel to rough up its interior and this makes the whole engine finnicky about timing advance but better on fuel?
Yes it does have an improvement on fuel but requires lots of maintenance with the timing with the current system. I have with a laptop controlling the timing.
I wrote a program in quickbasic 4.5 and interfaced the printer port to my cars ignition system.


A modern EMC system with knock sensor may give less trouble but I haven't got that far yet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2012, 01:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
you don't adjust timing based on vacuum/MAP, only RPM?

that's just like a distributor with it's vacuum advance disconnected... works great when at full throttle, horrible at anything less than that.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 02:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 21

Smokingwheels - '84 Nissan Bluebird wagon LX
90 day: 35.99 mpg (US)

Red Z - '79 Nissan 280 ZX

Blue Ford - '95 Ford Falcon GLI
90 day: 18.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via MSN to Smokingwheels Send a message via Yahoo to Smokingwheels
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertISaar View Post
you don't adjust timing based on vacuum/MAP, only RPM?

that's just like a distributor with it's vacuum advance disconnected... works great when at full throttle, horrible at anything less than that.
The program looks at what speed the engine is doing to get a baseline timing value for that rpm and the the 2 vacuum switches tell the computer how much to advance the timing off the baseline, I know its not as good as a MAP sensor but that's how its been running for all the time the computer has been fitted.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com