Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-18-2017, 06:18 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 36
Thanks: 5
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Dodge Cummins 2WD/4WD mechanical efficiency questions...

Good day, all!

Our Dakota Diesel + 5th Wheel streamliner plans have been expanded a bit; we're now likely to be full-timing, so the trailer got a foot wider and a hair taller, and tankage and gear requirements for full-time living took the weight past what I am willing to relegate to the Dakota/OM617 combo.

Therefore....

We are in the market for a 1996-98 5.9L 12v Diesel 5-spd. extended cab Dodge Ram 2500, as it has the capacity we would prefer with the fuel economy we want. I occasionally find one out there in 2WD, and there are loads of them available in 4WD. On our recent trip from South Florida to Idaho and back, I had a couple opportunities to ponder whether 4WD is really as unnecessary as I have always thought it to be. I also will be installing a Torsen differential in the Sonoma as soon as practical....

I would like experiences and opinions regarding the 2WD/4WD question, and the best setup for 4WD efficiency.

My thought is that if we are running the 4WD truck in 2WD most of the time, with manual front hub locks, we will be as close as we can get to the drivetrain efficiency of the 2WD drivetrain, while retaining 4H and 4L for getting out of problems.

I am curious about how much mileage is going to be lost in this sort of setup.

The other, more laborious (to use), option is to install a recovery winch on the 2WD truck and hope there is something appropriate to tie out to when needed. This doesn't help out with sketchy roads, but will get us out of an emergency.

Thoughts?

ThomCat316

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-18-2017, 06:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ar5boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Remember that a 2WD setup is really a 1WD setup and a 4WD setup is normally a 1 x rear + 1 x front drive, without something like a thorsen lsd.

My old Celica with the permanent Toyota AWD system didn't suck fuel at all for some reason.

It really just depends on how efficient the system is and things like optimising the lubrication can make a big difference.

Most 4WD owners of the older systems are disappointed with the off-road capabilities and go to install things like diff-lockers to reach 3WD status for their vehicles.

So if you have an idea about installing a thorsen on the rear, I'd really try that first and see how good it is. I've seen a lot of VW kombi's in stupid places with big tyres and wheels so now I take the '4WD Only' signs with a grain of salt.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2017, 09:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 725

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
90 day: 23.4 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 2×4 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
90 day: 20.24 mpg (US)

Jona Allison aero - '91 Dodge Ram D-250 Le
90 day: 20.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 427 Times in 278 Posts
Bigest question is are you going to be in snow country during winter?
Then 4x4 is good for DD. For interstate towing chains are required for towing. 2or 4wd don't mater.
Installing the free spin kit, like Skyking did ,will help with rolling resistance 5%@70 but dose nothing for the "tall truck" aero penalties 95% @70 (he saw a cupola mpg improvement) .. if this will be a highway only setup(4x4 is for snow/muck only) then consider lowering. You can maintain your tow capacity with airbags /solid /overload springs . Drop it as low as possible. With my 91 D250 1wd eaves a lot to be desired on ice. Underway it sticks to the ice vary well, geting moving now thats the sore spot, Ive had to put on chains to get out of a flat(albeit 6" of crusty frozen snow) parking spot.
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,HX35W/12/6 QSV
ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 31.32mpg 100mi 3.193 USG 5/2/20


Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg


  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2017, 12:02 AM   #4 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,396

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,192
Thanked 4,380 Times in 3,354 Posts
I'd certainly avoid the automatic trannys, so the 5-speed is a good choice.

2 wheel vs 4 wheel is a trade-off. My truck with low rolling resistance tires (narrow width) designed for the highway can't drive on flat, wet grass in 4WD, let alone 2WD. With higher rolling resistance tires designed for offroad use, I can drive around in 2WD on flat grass, and more difficult terrain in 4WD.

The trade-off is more weight/cost/complexity vs lower fuel economy due to running tires with more off-road traction.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2017, 12:32 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
We did an insane 10 mile jeep trail and only put it in 4wd twice as a precaution... that was downhill. Up hill we wouldn't have made it in 4wd. The uphill road was 20 miles and didn't really ever need 4wd either but it was bone dry. That was our stock suspension 2004 long bed crew cab with stock 2015 Ram highway 33" tires on factory 18" wheels. We were about dying on both roads with 75 psi in all the tires and 50 psi in the rear airbags. At the bottom of the shortcut was a sign that said basically Jeeps only. Little late on that warning, had we broken something up there it would have had to be fixed in place as no recovery truck could have gotten it out. In the end it was a blast because nothing bad did happen and it was beautiful.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2017, 03:04 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 41.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
I have lived in snow country (Wisconsin and the UP) for all but 4 years of my life. I have never owned, or even needed, four wheel drive. My truck does have the GMC locking rear end.

I do carry tire chains in my truck, and expect to use them once every year or two. It's not a big problem because it only takes 2 or 3 minutes to put them on.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (07-19-2017), slowmover (07-31-2017)
Old 07-19-2017, 05:17 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
the option of 2wd low is enough for me to have a 4wd and tow larger trailers.
__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2017, 12:48 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 36
Thanks: 5
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
So, it looks like the General Consensus (SIR!) is that a 2WD with a Torsen rear carrier will be the best overall answer (simple, efficient, low maintenance, positive 2WD), as we are not trail-crawling enthusiasts, and plan on staying out of the snow and ice.

Does this sound good considering the following rig?

Dodge 2500 Cummins 12V ext cab, bed replaced with skirted flatbed, low profile 5th wheel hitch.
Not planning on lowering, as there will be boondocking and really bad roads in the future, but will be belly-panning and otherwise enhancing the truck.
32ft. ultralight (3-4K lb.) streamliner trailer, built to the truck for aero.

One other question for those who have done this - if we aren't carrying spare off-road specific rear wheels, would cable-type chains be a good substitute in time of need?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2017, 03:52 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
Cable chains are good for traction on hard pack snow and ice, for deeper snow and slush link chains are better. The link chains will last longer as well but will ride rougher and mean lower speeds. If it's really bad out and you are towing you wouldn't want to go faster with cable chains anyway. I spend weeks if not months on end delivering mail in an old 2wd mail truck. We use link style hardened chains and they need repair every week even driving only 20 miles a day. We are at the disadvantage of having to run them sometimes on perfectly clear and dry paved roads because around the corner we will be back in the drifts.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
ThomCat316 (07-31-2017)
Old 07-20-2017, 03:57 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
cable chains will work in sand too.
Sounds a lot like my 96 Maybe we should talk a deal. It is an auto but I know of a 5 speed kit nearby.
IT has a custom air ride 5th wheel system in it too.

__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to skyking For This Useful Post:
ThomCat316 (07-31-2017)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com