Mirrorless Trucks Gain Heavy Favor In NHTSA Proposal
From a Yahoo news article.
"Revising rules that would allow truck and automobile manufacturers to install cameras in place of side and rearview mirrors has wide support based on comments received by federal safety officials. An Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in October generated close to 600 comments, most of which were in favor of the plan. The ANPR was issued in response to a 2014 petition filed jointly by the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and Tesla to allow camera monitor systems (CMS) to replace outside rearview mirrors on cars and a similar petition filed in 2015 by Daimler Trucks North America for heavy trucks. In addition to improved safety that video cameras provide by reducing or eliminating blind spots, several comments also pointed out economic benefits. "Allowing truck manufacturers to install CMS in lieu of rearview mirrors would unlock a unique opportunity to make a consequential step forward in the aerodynamic performance of heavy-duty tractors," the Truck and Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) stated in comments filed in December. EMA claimed that an estimated 0.8% to 2% improvement in fuel efficiency (from reduced aerodynamic drag caused by eliminating side mirrors) could save a trucking company 160 to 400 gallons of fuel on a single tractor in one year, based on annual consumption of 20,000 gallons of fuel." Full article here: https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/m...222053763.html JJ |
This is all fun&games until one or both cameras stops working.
|
Quote:
PS, on second thought if they mandated the use they could probably push it through no problem. There is always support from inside government to make government more controlling, and always support for the automakers to add more expensive "requirements" |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
That doesn't mean they are necessarily safer, but that we don't just think of the worst case scenario and then assume that's the likely outcome. My hunch is that cameras will increase safety overall, despite scenarios where they are inferior to mirrors. There is no such thing as the perfect, but we shouldn't let that get in the way of the better. |
Quote:
As has already been stated. If a camera dies you replace it just like you would if your mirror broke or got sideswiped and ripped off. I've seen plenty of those. JJ |
Quote:
Optical mirrors also fail. And we can make video mirrors robust. |
Quote:
Now don't get me wrong on this. The idea of cameras as mirrors is good, and good for aerodynamics. And cameras bring safety to trucks/heavy machinery by showing all the blind spots. My point was that mirrors are way more reliable than cameras. In my opinion, cameras could be used more in "people-cars" where you are not that much in deep poo if you lose one or two mirrors. You still see stuff through the windows. |
I've had video mirrors for a long time. Biggest hindrance? Lack of good quality cameras and screens. Otherwise it's (in my opinion) a vastly preferable option.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com