More efficient HVAC fan for cars?
 

I no longer have the 93 tracer wagon... upgraded to a 99 Escort wagon with a swapped in zetec engine. I will soon have changed to all LED's for car lighting, except front turn signals so I can prevent hyperblinking. The last big power draw normally in use is the HVAC fan. I have already insulated all the panels below the window line front to rear with 1/2 duct insulation and will be doing the roof this next year, so my heating and cooling loads will probably be cut in half. Has anyone found a more efficient motor for using for the HVAC or some way to make the current motor more efficient to run? Any cheap ECM motors or more efficient speed controls so I could run the motor at low speeds efficiently?

I am also running a 25 % underdrive pulley. Gearing in the car however, keeps the revs up.

I had linked to something about this before, but the images are gone... Assuming your car doesn’t already have it, PWM speed control. At full speed it doesn’t matter, at the lowest speed the amount of power drawn is small. IIRC I think when you’re running medium or low-medium with resistors you could be using 75-80% of the power of running full speed, and have half of it being used by the resistors. The percentage being wasted on low is greater, but the total draw is much less.
I don’t think it would be worth it unless you get a junkyard PWM speed control with connector, and it used as many or more individual speed inputs as your current resistor.

I think I currently have 4 speeds. If I understand correctly , you are saying that the current low speed already is using much lower power than the higher speeds or is that only with the PWM control? I assumed that all speeds have resistors, so I also assumed power draw was always high.

Full speed just runs straight electrical system power to the blower. But a pwm can make it a lot more efficient over a resistor.

yep...
 

I meant to say resistors on all the lower speeds. I am guessing the only time I'll need high is for defrosting. I bet low will be enough for heating even on below zero days once I finish the insulation.

So if say you used the lowest (speed 1) primarily, the total draw is relatively low, and while pwm would gain a lot in terms of %, the total amperage, or wattage to be saved would be very small. The real gains to be had with pwm would be if you use speeds 2 or 3 commonly. If you only used speeds 1 and 4 it really wouldn’t matter whether you had pwm or not

That doesn't make sense. The highest efficiency gains to be had with PWM would be at the lowest settings and have diminishing returns the higher the "speed" (lower resistance) up until the "hi" setting, which is a straight connection to the battery.

I once measured the heater blower power draw in my truck: https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...raw-18678.html.

In winter, I mostly leave the heater blower on the lowest speed, and the second lowest speed when the temperature is below zero Fahrenheit. A more efficient blower with LED lighting is tempting because it would have got me THAT close to a 40 MPG summer average....

It sounds counter intuitive on the surface, but a greater percentage of a smaller number wouldn’t necessarily be more than a smaller percentage of a greater number or vice versa. Jrmichler's blower doubled its draw from speed 1 to 2, so if the efficiency gains aren't double on low vs setting 2, you would be saving more power on setting 2 than 1.
I imagine this could also vary from vehicle to vehicle. I’m also regurgitating info i saw years ago I can’t see from some chart on Pulse-Width Modulated Fan Controllers for Automotive Applications | PowerGuru - Power Electronics Information Portal
But maybe you can with a different browser. But as I recall, it seemed like the squeeze wasn’t going to be worth the juice at the lowest setting

Hmm
 

I was thinking that the resistors would keep the total power used pretty constant no matter what speed you're on , but that assumption is obviously not right. It looks like I will be saving quite a bit just by being able to run low almost all the time.

I understand what you are saying about the percentage savings being higher at low speed, but the power consumption is already so low it isn't really worth upgrading.

It looks like I am already at the knee in the cost effectiveness curve. I'll just replace the rest of the Instrument lights with LEDs and I'll be in good shape.


If I eventually get the AC working, that insulation should gain me some MPG in the summer too. The compressor and blower both will have a lot less work to do.

Higher resistance (low fans speed) does consume a higher percentage of the total power, but it also reduces the total power. For example, on high fan speed, the most power is consumed, but 0% of it is wasted by resistors.

I replaced a three resistor four fan speed controller with a PWM controller in my 1994 Suburban. I now have a dial, and can dial the speed to any speed I want, which is a nice feature.

Have a writeup?

Ecky,

I never did a specific writeup for it, it was in the middle of my "rewire the vehicle from scratch" bout of insanity. Not that hard to do though, 12v Fan Power in, 3 wire potentiometer, output to the fan motor.