Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-02-2011, 01:05 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 5

Mazdaspeed - '04 mazda Mazdaspeed Miata MAZDASPEED
90 day: 26.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Another truck driver here.

I have an '88 chevy c1500 full size truck with a 350 v8 and an automatic transmission. I get around 17 interstate(70+mph) mpg now. I've always wanted to see the results of an aero shell because I knew it would improve airflow compared to anything else. I don't want to make my truck stand out too much though.

engine stuff I am interested in:
-electric water pump

-electric cooling fan

-removing air pump, I have a new 50 state catalytic converter that doesn't need an air pump.

I don't think gm made those full size trucks without power steering so there probably isn't a low geared steering box out there I can put on in place of the power steering. A larger steering wheel probably won't help enough to maneuver that big truck through parking lots.

If I could get the pulley system down to just the alternator and crankshaft pulley, maybe I could run without the alternator attached and charge the battery nightly.

EDIT: I remembered that I am not yet willing to give up my a/c, but I can get an appropriately sized belt to run only the a/c, tensioner, alternator, and p/s pump. So the only drag I would give up is the mechanical fan, mechanical water pump, and the air pump.

Aero/drag mods:
-removing windshield wipers.
-mirror delete or smaller mirrors, they're huge
-skinnier tires (when I need new ones) 255s on it now
-grille block except when towing
-Already have an air dam, about 8" clearance.

are all these mods effective? What fuel savings could I see with just engine, just aero, or all mods together.


Last edited by Brandon1048; 09-02-2011 at 01:27 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-02-2011, 09:58 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
I doubt you'll see much benefit from the wipers. Your truck is already an aerodynamic brick and IMO its not worth ditching them anyways.

The alternator delete is a good one. However, you'll need a deep cycle battery. The starting battery won't last long if you start to deep cycle it.

An aerocap would be your best gain coupled with adjusting the nut behind the wheel.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 03:13 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
If you don't want to stand out, look into grille blocks, belly pans, and air dams. A site search using "aero topper" will bring up some good threads. I would not delete windshield wipers.

What is your RPM at 60 MPH?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 04:28 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pensacola
Posts: 5

Mazdaspeed - '04 mazda Mazdaspeed Miata MAZDASPEED
90 day: 26.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler View Post

What is your RPM at 60 MPH?
about 1500, and there's almost no load on the engine, maybe some 2.73 gears could be put in place of the 3.08s that I have now?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 05:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
If you are driving 70+ MPH, then engine accessory losses are small compared to aerodynamic drag. Your truck is already geared for mileage. If there's almost no load on the engine, a taller rear end ratio will help somewhat.

Go after the big aerodynamic losses - grille block, air dam, belly pan, and aero topper. I got more benefit from the grille block than my aero topper. That's also the easiest mod.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com