Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-11-2010, 08:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Posts: 76

sukisuki - '00 Suzuki Grand Vitara 4wd
90 day: 21.88 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
New study shows 0 impact of a clogged air filter on fuel injected cars

From EPA site:


It was instead (obviously) on carburetor cars.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to tangomar For This Useful Post:
2000mc (05-08-2016), Christ (03-11-2010), dremd (03-11-2010), gone-ot (03-16-2010), mcrews (03-16-2014), PaleMelanesian (03-17-2010), Piwoslaw (03-17-2010), tasdrouille (03-11-2010)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 03-11-2010, 09:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,750

FarFarfrumpumpen - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon GLS Premium

Quorra - '12 Tesla Model S P85
Thanks: 57
Thanked 108 Times in 84 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dremd
I've been telling people this for years, and they have been telling me I'm wrong for years citing those cards on parts counters as evidence that I am wrong.
2012 Tesla Model S P85
2013 Nissan LEAF SV totaled by now deceased intoxacated driver.
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 10:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I always thought this was mostly obvious...

It's the reason I don't change my air filter, or just don't use one (instead, I use a T-shirt.)
"ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 10:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
AeroModder's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
The simulated clogged filter significantly affected vehicle performance, increasing the time to accelerate from 20 to 80 mph by 0.6 to 1.7 seconds on the three vehicles. The Outlet DP measured for each vehicle was sufficient for setting a common air filter indicator to the “change” or “clogged” position. For each vehicle, the Outlet DP at some point exceeded 5 kPa and showed an increase over the clean filter in excess of 2.5 kPa, a common standard for defining a dirty air filter.5,9–11
Despite the filter restrictions, however, no significant changes in fuel economy were observed. Each vehicle was run through at least three rounds of FTP, HFET, and US06 tests with the new air filter, and the same protocol was repeated with the clogged air filter. The tests were conducted on consecutive days for each vehicle. This format was used to allow for the required soak time to perform a cold FTP each morning. The resulting fuel economy data for the vehicles are shown in Figs. 3.8, 3.9, and 3.10. Range bars in the figures show the minimum and maximum of the tests for each case, while the columns show the average. Test-to-test repeatability is within about 1.5%, and all of the variances between the new and clogged air filter cases are similarly within about 1.7%. The baseline fuel economies for the vehicles were all within 0–6% of unadjusted EPA certification database values (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) for similar vehicles.
Summary: In fuel injected cars, a computer monitors the air/fuel ratio and puts in less gas when you get less air, so FE isn't harmed, but performance is.

In carburated cars, a clogged filter alters the air/fuel ratio and degrades both performance and economy.
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 11:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...ain't it wonderful that computers are able to "correct & compensate" for lazy car owners (wink,wink)?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 11:06 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
doviatt's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
So, does this also have a corollary effect on the discussions of ram air, and warm air induction?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 11:49 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Jyden's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 338

Enduro E-bike - '11 PowerPedals Enduro
90 day: 2236 mpg (US)

Jota - '14 Toyota Yaris Hybrid H1
90 day: 53.11 mpg (US)
Thanks: 138
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
This would only be true for non turbo gas engines I belive. So keep your airfilter on your diesel og turbo car in good shape - clean that is!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 12:51 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
tasdrouille's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
negative boost is negative boost, regardless of the engine type. The only difference is the carbed cars don't dynamically adjust fueling, that's all.

All this study is saying in the end is that even if your filter is clogged, the negative boost is never enough to have a significant impact on fuel economy when driven in normal conditions. A free flowing filter is always better, but so marginally better it's insignificant. Ram air reduces, and can even negate, negative boost, but again it's not much significant under normal driving conditions. WAI has ramifications in the combustion process itself so it's not just about negative boost in that case.

www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 02:22 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
Organic-Mechanix.com's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: St Louis
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This makes perfect sense--The AFM only measures that comes into the unit through the filter, clogged or not. The fuel trims will adjust for the airflow and not be effected by the restriction before the monitoring device.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2010, 02:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...of course, all this "adjustment" is predicated upon the precision of the incoming measurement(s)...which are usually "close enough" at their design-center, but certainly NOT so at the edges/limits of their operating "ranges."

...Flex-Fuel vehicles, with their much WIDER-range sensors and computer algorithms, will probably be affected by this much LESS than the remaining 85% of the cars on the road (pun intended).

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
mcrews (03-16-2014)
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Warm Air Intakes (WAI) & Cold Air Intakes (CAI) toomuch EcoModding Central 23 05-26-2019 05:41 AM
Hydrogen Generator Experiment willy57 DIY / How-to 601 08-23-2016 05:53 AM
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 16 12-21-2015 01:49 AM
mileage computer for a carbureted engine diesel_john Instrumentation 221 05-01-2014 10:38 PM
Emissions Standards - "Good For Fuel Efficiency," Consumption Data Says trebuchet03 General Efficiency Discussion 11 04-18-2008 01:15 AM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com