Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-06-2014, 10:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Spaced out...
 
spacemanspif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 748

The New Focus - '07 Ford Focus ZX5
90 day: 32.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 205 Times in 149 Posts
Tire Choices

It's looking like I'm going to need tires soon as my right rear tire is wearing faster than the left. Guessing an alignment is in order as well and since I replace tires in pairs I'll be buying 2 new tires and have a few questions on types and size.

1. I am currently running 195-60-15 and am thinking about getting narrower ones; 175-65-15 are 0.2" shorter than the 195-60s. Wondering if 175s on a 6" wide wheel are too narrow and/or MPG beneficial? I'd like to consider safety as well, I don't drive like a crazy person but I want to be safe in all weather conditions and will take a small MPG hit to retain safety.

2. LRR tires in both sizes seem to start around $80/each on tirerack.com and there are tires $20 less that aren't. Will LRR tires pay for themselves in savings? What are some realistic gains to be had from these tires?

For reference, with my taller geared trans I cruise at 2,000rpm @ 60mph. I think that it is about at the bottom of my eco range and think that spinning the engine a little more might be beneficial for my 95% highway commute. Thinking that a little more rpm might keep the engine from loading so much while climbing all the overpasses I deal with and might net a small mpg gain, or at least not take a hit (hopefully).

Thanks,

__________________
-Mike

2007 Ford Focus ZX5 - 91k - SGII, pending upper and lower grill bocks - auto trans
1987 Monte Carlo SS - 5.3/4L80E swap - 13.67 @ 106
2007 Ford Focus Estate - 230k - 33mpg - Retired 4/2018
1995 Saturn SL2 - 256K miles - 44mpg - Retired 9/2014

Cost to Operate Spreadsheet for "The New Focus"

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-06-2014, 11:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
I wouldn't be scared of the 175-65-15 size. 175-70-14 was an optional size, at least on the coupes, and both 175s get the same load rating.
That being said I'd get the 195s ,my pick in the 175 would be the Yokohama avid ascend, which is $5 cheaper per tire in the 195 size. The 195s also offer more tire options.
If you're expecting 95% highway, if anything I'd be thinking about a larger diameter. If you think the engine is lugging more than you would like then reduce the load with aero mods and lrr tires, rather than making the engine spin faster
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 2000mc For This Useful Post:
mcrews (08-07-2014)
Old 08-07-2014, 07:03 AM   #3 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacemanspif View Post
It's looking like I'm going to need tires soon as my right rear tire is wearing faster than the left. Guessing an alignment is in order as well and since I replace tires in pairs I'll be buying 2 new tires and have a few questions on types and size.

1. I am currently running 195-60-15 and am thinking about getting narrower ones; 175-65-15 are 0.2" shorter than the 195-60s. Wondering if 175s on a 6" wide wheel are too narrow and/or MPG beneficial? I'd like to consider safety as well, I don't drive like a crazy person but I want to be safe in all weather conditions and will take a small MPG hit to retain safety........
That is going the wrong direction for safety. That is going down in load carrying capacity and directionally that is towards increased risk of tire failure.

Also, not only is the vehicle being required to operate at a higher rpm for a given speed - which usually hurts fuel economy - but the rolling resistance is actually worse for a smaller size (all other things being equal).

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacemanspif View Post
2. LRR tires in both sizes seem to start around $80/each on tirerack.com and there are tires $20 less that aren't. Will LRR tires pay for themselves in savings? What are some realistic gains to be had from these tires? .....
I think this depends on how much highway driving you do compared to how much city driving you do.

Tires with low rolling resistance tend to wear more rapidly, and city driving causes tire to wear more rapid, so the combination might result in more money being spent to replace the tires more often.

But be aware that the term "LRR" is a relative term. It means "Better RR compared to other tires with similar wear and traction properties" - and with that in might, it would be better to have LRR than not. You need to decide what compromise you are willling to live with.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacemanspif View Post
.........For reference, with my taller geared trans I cruise at 2,000rpm @ 60mph. I think that it is about at the bottom of my eco range and think that spinning the engine a little more might be beneficial for my 95% highway commute. Thinking that a little more rpm might keep the engine from loading so much while climbing all the overpasses I deal with and might net a small mpg gain, or at least not take a hit (hopefully).

Thanks,
Based on that you will get many miles out of a set of tires - and you would benefit from a larger diameter tire.

Try to fit as large a diameter tire as you can - best guess not knowing your exact vehicle is 2 sizes larger. (Even if you tell us the exact vehicle, we won't be able to tell what fits as there aren't any charts published that tell us how big the fenderwells are.)

The second part is careful tire selection. Unfortunately, RR values aren't published as there are a number of RR tests and they don't give the same value. To compare tires, the tests have to be the same.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
mcrews (08-07-2014), niky (08-08-2014)
Old 08-07-2014, 12:04 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
I use the tables at tire rack.com to determine accepted width selection.
But I also agrre that you should go UP in diameter, not down.
1. gives a 'little bit' more comfortable ride (w/ the higher psis we need that)
2. would probably only lower the rpm 75-100.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2014, 01:41 PM   #5 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
I agree with all three above responses as to gearing/mpg effects of tire sizes. Take mccrews' advice too and study the tirerack.com specs lists more. My Michelin Defenders are great (they were also my only choice in 13" tires, but I might have chosen them anyway for the 15" wheels I considered buying for gearing purposes). IIRC, some of the LRR tires got really great ratings for durability in terms of miles traveled too. Good luck!
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
mcrews (08-07-2014)
Old 08-07-2014, 11:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
Spaced out...
 
spacemanspif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dirty Jersey
Posts: 748

The New Focus - '07 Ford Focus ZX5
90 day: 32.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 205 Times in 149 Posts
Thanks for the replies guys. I checked my alignment today with some hand tools my friends have and seems that everything checked out. Same reading at the front and back of tire and same camber as well. Not sure why the 1 tire seems to be wearing faster though. I think it has a fair amount of life left in it so I won't have to worry about new ones until maybe next summer or later this winter. Pretty sure I am going to stick with the 195-60-15 size as choices get slim when playing with sizes. FWIW I don't think that a taller tire would be beneficial with the tall gear trans that I have unless I started to drive faster on the road...but then I still have wind resistance to factor in to the mix...

A look at the BSFC chart shows why I think it might have been a good idea to go a little shorter. Seems that 2500rpm is dead center of the 250island, and 2000rpm is a little on the front edge but at a spot with engine making less torque. Less torque would mean harder to climb hills and even with better aero, I'd be fighting gravity.



Thoughts??

200mc; Joint team Saturn!!
__________________
-Mike

2007 Ford Focus ZX5 - 91k - SGII, pending upper and lower grill bocks - auto trans
1987 Monte Carlo SS - 5.3/4L80E swap - 13.67 @ 106
2007 Ford Focus Estate - 230k - 33mpg - Retired 4/2018
1995 Saturn SL2 - 256K miles - 44mpg - Retired 9/2014

Cost to Operate Spreadsheet for "The New Focus"

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2014, 12:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Drop down a gear to climb the hills, coast downhill. When you don't need 4th use 5th or even better coast. Might try downshift pulsing uphill then peak speed coasting as far as you can downhill. Ay a certain grade and speed you car should downshift, unless you get peak speed at the bottom and bleed it off up the next hill.

It all depends on length and grade.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
Daox (08-08-2014)
Old 08-10-2014, 10:37 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
CargoBoatTails's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New England
Posts: 71
Thanks: 39
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
tirerack.com allows you to sort LRR only
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 02:12 PM   #9 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,175

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 269
Thanked 3,522 Times in 2,796 Posts
I was going to say
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eum-26530.html
But they only make them in 16 inch and up.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 02:38 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
I also am in the market for new tires. I found http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires....RUEC&tab=Sizes

Im waiting on more reviews and surveys before I buy.

__________________




  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com