Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-25-2026, 12:57 PM   #1581 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 30,936
Thanks: 8,835
Thanked 9,518 Times in 7,855 Posts
Front fender cove, like the 1956 Corvette.

I like the roof line, the black windshield frame and the magnesium panel at the header. The black over red two tone reminds me of the old Karmann Ghias.

__________________
.
..
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

___________________
.
..
Now for the ball scores: 4 to 3, 6 to 2 and 8 to 1 -- Firesign Theater
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-28-2026, 08:31 PM   #1582 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 169
Thanked 2,872 Times in 2,015 Posts
https://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-...l#post12639997
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2026, 06:41 AM   #1583 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 169
Thanked 2,872 Times in 2,015 Posts
https://www.topgear.com.ph/features/...ncy-experiment


To be fair, the bilao was used as a template for sheet rubber.



Quote:
Aerodynamic buffs often refer to the idealized teardrop-shaped template as one that provides the least drag. The template above comes from a 1930s aerodynamics study, and is shared online by noted aerodynamics enthusiast Phil Knox. Some of his work can be seen here.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2026, 06:52 AM   #1584 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 169
Thanked 2,872 Times in 2,015 Posts
https://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-...l#post12649315







__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
Piwoslaw (05-25-2026)
Old 05-16-2026, 06:54 AM   #1585 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,275
Thanks: 169
Thanked 2,872 Times in 2,015 Posts
https://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-...l#post12649315


__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2026, 04:29 AM   #1586 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: South Africa
Posts: 1,439
Thanks: 593
Thanked 646 Times in 544 Posts



https://scientificgems.wordpress.com...ins-and-stuff/

https://delftsolarteam.com/legacy/nuna-13

NB the Dorsal Fins!
Those turn into the wind, with a bit of 'attack angle', creating forward thrust.


What AI has to say about a fin 2m high (well below max legal height), with a chord that decreases from 1m to 0.5m at the top:

Rough Force Estimates (Physics-Based)
Using standard airfoil equations (½ ρ V² × Area × Coefficient), with a decent airfoil (Cl ≈ 1.0 at moderate AoA, Cd ≈ 0.08–0.12 → L/D around 10:1).

At stationary car, 25 km/h pure crosswind (typical breezy day in windy areas):
Forward thrust (from lift component): ~35–50 N (~3.5–5 kg force)
Sideways force: ~80–120 N (~8–12 kg force) — still higher due to vector geometry, but not overwhelmingly so with a good wing.

At 40 km/h car speed + 25 km/h crosswind (common mixed condition):
Apparent wind improves → forward thrust rises to ~80–130 N (8 to 13 kg) range, with better forward/side ratio.

At 80 km/h car speed + 25 km/h crosswind:
Forward thrust can reach 200–350+ N (20 to 35+ kg) in good angles — that's genuinely useful (several percent of total drag on a small hatchback).


Last edited by Logic; 05-26-2026 at 02:10 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Logic For This Useful Post:
freebeard (05-21-2026)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com