Random Thought: Driving Backward
 

Since I have been paying more attention to aerodynamics, I have started taking a closer look at the body designs of the cars I see on the road. The one thing I've noticed is it seems like almost every car I see on the road would be more aerodynamic if driven backward. What do you guys think? Am I far off on this, or just plain wrong? Obviously, there are a number of reasons why we couldn't just drive around backward, but I thought it was an interesting thing to note.

Thanks! I see I wasn't the only one wondering about this! :-P

Mythbusters "tested" this and supposedly "busted" it, however, looking at the car they tested, it's clear why they showed that the forward-facing car was better:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cm/p...10_1110-md.jpg

It really all depends on the car that's tested--that particular one has a pretty nice rear end.

And that is what I was thinking: Of course, all other things being equal, driving backwards would be less efficient. Lower gearing, more steering corrections, unnecessary and easily removed protrusions, etc.

However, if you quite literally reversed only the shell of the body, but the gearing, engine layout, etc. stayed the same, I'm almost certain the results would be different.

That's what they did (reversed the body). My point was that the shape of the car that they tested IS better forward vs backwards (note the gradual-sloping rear), however, in many cars that's not the case. It's not just a matter of making a blanket statement of forward is always best or backwards is always best--it depends on the car.

Ahh, I see. Maybe I should start watching more Mythbusters. :-P

I like to watch it, but occoasionally I find myself yelling at them that they're doing it all wrong.

From the HAMB

Not true with my car, for sure.
http://i1179.photobucket.com/albums/..._4576Small.jpg