Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-17-2019, 08:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: -
Posts: 28
Thanks: 9
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Engine bay aero?

OK, we all know that the engine bay is very dirty aerodynamically.
In most cars we can't avoid passing some air there.
We also can't make the flow there clean, far from that.

The question is:
Can we make the airflow cleaner than otherwise? Cleaner enough to be worth the effort?

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Magajgfha For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-19-2019)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-17-2019, 09:24 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,009

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,507 Times in 1,550 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magajgfha View Post
OK, we all know that the engine bay is very dirty aerodynamically.
In most cars we can't avoid passing some air there.
We also can't make the flow there clean, far from that.

The question is:
Can we make the airflow cleaner than otherwise? Cleaner enough to be worth the effort?
In my car, Honda went through some lengths to direct the air which passes through the radiator, out through the wheel wells rather than the rear of the hood or the bottom of the engine bay. Presumably there was a reason for this, but I have no data or facts to support this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 09:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
What let's air out can also let water spray filled with road salt in.

This will corrode the electronics.

However, it may take many years to do this.

Today's electronically dependent cars have design measures to avoid this, most designs over 20 years old do not - in my opinion.

Think twice before you let the devil in.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 09:43 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,009

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,507 Times in 1,550 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
What let's air out can also let water spray filled with road salt in.

This will corrode the electronics.

However, it may take many years to do this.

Today's electronically dependent cars have design measures to avoid this, most designs over 20 years old do not - in my opinion.

Think twice before you let the devil in.
I definitely get road salt in the engine bay. Thankfully most stuff is aluminum in my car. I've considered making baffles to block spray.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 10:34 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mpg_numbers_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,365

Toby - '13 Toyota Prius C
90 day: 61.75 mpg (US)

Daz - '15 Mazda 3 iTouring w/ Tech Package
90 day: 38.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 321
Thanked 481 Times in 366 Posts
I've been thinking about fabricating something to cover the rear well area to prevent salt from getting in. What's wrong with air exiting underneath the car? Seems like the airflow under the car would keep the exhausted air flow attached.
__________________
2013 Toyota Prius C 2 (my car)


2015 Mazda 3 iTouring Hatchback w/ Tech Package (wife's car)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 10:47 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,009

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,866
Thanked 2,507 Times in 1,550 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpg_numbers_guy View Post
I've been thinking about fabricating something to cover the rear well area to prevent salt from getting in. What's wrong with air exiting underneath the car? Seems like the airflow under the car would keep the exhausted air flow attached.
Unsure. Might make it a high pressure zone? Just a guess.

I don't think I get salt in from the rear/bottom, but the tires throw salt all over the catalyst when turning, which is probably why they rust so badly. I could also see salt affecting the coil packs on the back of the engine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 11:06 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mpg_numbers_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,365

Toby - '13 Toyota Prius C
90 day: 61.75 mpg (US)

Daz - '15 Mazda 3 iTouring w/ Tech Package
90 day: 38.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 321
Thanked 481 Times in 366 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
Unsure. Might make it a high pressure zone? Just a guess.

I don't think I get salt in from the rear/bottom, but the tires throw salt all over the catalyst when turning, which is probably why they rust so badly. I could also see salt affecting the coil packs on the back of the engine.
I used to get salt and stuff from underneath until I installed Scott's belly pan (which I had to retrofit because the OEM one was like ripped off with the bolt threads rusted in) but the pan is shielding the engine now. I still get crud and stuff in through the wheel wells though. Don't want that, plus there's a risk of that crud somehow getting caught up into my WAI.
__________________
2013 Toyota Prius C 2 (my car)


2015 Mazda 3 iTouring Hatchback w/ Tech Package (wife's car)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 03:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,619
Thanks: 7,758
Thanked 8,572 Times in 7,058 Posts
Quote:
The question is:
Can we make the airflow cleaner than otherwise? Cleaner enough to be worth the effort?
Depends on the car. My Superbeetle has a positive displacement pump that moves air from the engine compartment into the shrouding. Streamlining is not an issue.

The Dasher has a rat's nest of hoses and cables and wires. More modern cars have coils right next to the spark plugs and covers for the bumpy bits. Look for show car engine compartments, the have flattened firewalls and hidden wiring.

Most of the internal drag is in the radiator itself.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2019, 12:49 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,879
Thanks: 23,955
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
engine bay

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magajgfha View Post
OK, we all know that the engine bay is very dirty aerodynamically.
In most cars we can't avoid passing some air there.
We also can't make the flow there clean, far from that.

The question is:
Can we make the airflow cleaner than otherwise? Cleaner enough to be worth the effort?
*an old metric was,that the cooling system could constitute up to 12% of a vehicle's overall drag.
*over the years,automakers have improved on that,with fake grilles,active shutters.
*the 1963 Walter Korff' Chrysler Charger Daytona cooling system would cover the inlet portion of drag,with it's 1/6th-height grille inlet,and fully-ducted passage to the radiator.
*to reduce from there,you'd have to fully duct the extractor portion,with contoured tuned outlets located at low pressure regions on the body.Ferrari has spent over $100,000 to develop a working system such as this.For one specific car.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The lowest drag cars are electrics,with virtually zero cooling systems,or ICE vehicles,with closed fronts,and rear radiators of integrated,aerodynamically-tuned design.Again,$hundreds of thousands.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2019, 05:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
I think on your own front engine car, the best you can do if you have a really big grille would be block part of it off and make some ducting for the radiator right? It would be very difficult to tell how the air flows through the engine bay and modify fenders or the hood accordingly.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-23-2019)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com